Rankings of Negro League players should consider that Negro League data is not complete. Research is still ongoing and we’ll continue to publish updates as more information becomes available. Negro Leagues Data: Frequently Asked Questions

Negro National League II Pitching Leaders

Wins Above Replacement--all

<strong>Wins Above Replacement</strong><br>A single number that presents the number of wins the player added<br>to the team above what a replacement player (think AAA or AAAA) would add.<br>Scale for a single-season: 8+ MVP Quality, 5+ All-Star Quality, 2+ Starter,<br>0-2 Reserve, < 0 Replacement Level <br>Developed by Sean Smith of BaseballProjection.com

1. WelmakerHG 4.5
2. PartlowPS 3.4
3. ByrdBEG 3.0
4. CampanellaBEG 2.8
5. AustinPS 2.7
6. GibsonHG 2.6
7. RicksPS 2.2
8. Wright3TM 2.1
9. BlairHG 2.1
10. StanleyNBY 2.1

WAR for Pitchers

<strong>Wins Above Replacement for Pitchers</strong><br>A single number that presents the number of wins the player added<br>to the team above what a replacement player (think AAA or AAAA) would add. This value includes defensive support and includes additional value for high leverage situations.<br>Scale: 8+ MVP Quality, 5+ All-Star Quality, 2+ Starter,<br>0-2 Reserve, < 0 Replacement Level <br> Developed by Sean Smith of BaseballProjection.com

1. WelmakerHG 4.2
2. PartlowPS 3.2
3. ByrdBEG 2.9
4. Wright2TM 2.2
5. StanleyNBY 2.2
6. BlairHG 2.1
7. MorrisNYC 1.8
8. PorterBEG 1.8
9. RicksPS 1.5
10. NewcombeNE 1.4

Earned Run Average

<strong>9 * ER / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played.<br>Bold indicates lowest ERA using current stats<br><span class=glimmer>Gold</span> means awarded ERA title at end of year.

1. BlairHG 0.96
2. Wright2TM 1.38
3. MorrisNYC 1.73
4. WelmakerHG 2.59
5. RicksPS 2.60
6. PartlowPS 2.63
7. MillerPS 2.72
8. PorterBEG 2.94
9. NewcombeNE 2.95
10. ByrdBEG 3.10

Wins

Wins

1. WelmakerHG 12
2. ByrdBEG 11
3. PartlowPS 8
PorterBEG 8
5. BlairHG 5
NewcombeNE 5
StanleyNBY 5
8. Wright2TM 4
MillerPS 4
GloverBEG 4
RicksPS 4
ScantleburyNYC 4
TiantNYC 4
WalkerHG 4

Win-Loss %

<strong>Win-Loss Percentage</strong><br>W / (W + L)<br>For players, leaders need one decision for every ten team games.<br>For managers, minimum to qualify for leading is 320 games.

1. Wright2TM 1.000
2. WelmakerHG .857
3. BlairHG .833
4. TiantNYC .800
ScantleburyNYC .800
PorterBEG .800
7. BrownPS .750
SunkettPS .750
9. ByrdBEG .688
10. RicksPS .667
PartlowPS .667

Walks & Hits per IP

<strong>(BB + H)/IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. BlairHG 0.957
2. MorrisNYC 0.984
3. Wright2TM 1.051
4. NewcombeNE 1.132
5. PartlowPS 1.159
6. WelmakerHG 1.194
7. RicksPS 1.197
8. BrownHG 1.210
9. ByrdBEG 1.232
10. PorterBEG 1.242

Hits per 9 IP

<strong>9 x H / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. MorrisNYC 6.048
2. BlairHG 6.511
3. Wright2TM 7.292
4. PartlowPS 7.566
5. NewcombeNE 7.609
6. HintonBEG 7.977
7. RicksPS 8.174
8. WelmakerHG 8.226
9. SunkettPS 8.640
10. PorterBEG 9.095

Bases On Balls per 9 IP

<strong>9 x BB / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. ScantleburyNYC 1.052
2. HookerNE 1.500
3. StanleyNBY 1.577
4. BrownHG 1.742
5. ByrdBEG 1.929
6. PorterBEG 2.084
7. BlairHG 2.106
8. Wright2TM 2.168
9. BarnhillNYC 2.395
10. WelmakerHG 2.521

Strikeouts per 9 IP

<strong>9 x SO / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. TiantNYC 8.679
2. BarnhillNYC 8.056
3. NewcombeNE 6.995
4. MorrisNYC 6.480
5. PartlowPS 6.372
6. ByrdBEG 6.268
7. RicksPS 5.945
8. GloverBEG 5.756
9. HintonBEG 5.523
10. WelmakerHG 5.307

Games Played

Games Played or Pitched

1. ByrdBEG 18
PartlowPS 18
3. WelmakerHG 15
RicksPS 15
5. StanleyNBY 14
HarrisPS 14
7. PorterBEG 13
8. WalkerHG 12
ScantleburyNYC 12
MackNBY 12

Saves

Saves

1. AndersonNYC 1
ByrdBEG 1
CarterHG 1
CrueNBY 1
HarrisPS 1
HintonBEG 1
LewisHG 1
MorrisNYC 1
RicksPS 1
ScantleburyNYC 1
StanleyNBY 1
TiantNYC 1
WalkerHG 1
WalkerHG 1
Walker2TM 1

Innings Pitched

Innings Pitched

1. WelmakerHG 135.2
2. ByrdBEG 130.2
3. PartlowPS 113.0
4. PorterBEG 95.0
5. StanleyNBY 91.1
6. NewcombeNE 73.1
7. RicksPS 72.2
8. WalkerHG 72.1
9. HarrisPS 68.1
10. GloverBEG 65.2

Strikeouts

Strikeouts

1. ByrdBEG 91
2. WelmakerHG 80
PartlowPS 80
4. NewcombeNE 57
5. PorterBEG 53
6. StanleyNBY 49
7. RicksPS 48
8. TiantNYC 45
9. GloverBEG 42
10. HarrisPS 40

Games Started

Games Started

1. WelmakerHG 15
ByrdBEG 15
3. PartlowPS 13
4. PorterBEG 11
5. StanleyNBY 10
6. HarrisPS 9
WalkerHG 9
8. GloverBEG 8
NewcombeNE 8
10. RicksPS 7
HookerNE 7
HintonBEG 7

Complete Games

Complete Game

1. WelmakerHG 13
ByrdBEG 13
3. PartlowPS 9
4. NewcombeNE 8
5. HookerNE 7
StanleyNBY 7
7. GloverBEG 6
PorterBEG 6
9. Wright2TM 4
RicksPS 4
BrownHG 4
BlairHG 4
WalkerHG 4

Shutouts

Shutouts<br>No runs allowed and a complete game.

1. Wright2TM 2
2. BlairHG 1
BrownHG 1
ByrdBEG 1
HarrisPS 1
PorterBEG 1
RicksPS 1
StanleyNBY 1
SunkettPS 1
TiantNYC 1
WalkerHG 1
WelmakerHG 1

Home Runs

Home Runs Hit/Allowed

1. MackNBY 6
HopkinsNE 6
3. PorterBEG 4
DihigoNYC 4
StanleyNBY 4
6. BarnhillNYC 3
AndersonNYC 3
WelmakerHG 3
9. MorganBEG 2
MillerPS 2
PartlowPS 2
GloverBEG 2
DavisPS 2
CurryPS 2
ByrdBEG 2

Bases on Balls

Bases on Balls/Walks

1. WelmakerHG 38
2. PartlowPS 36
3. HarrisPS 35
MackNBY 35
5. MorganBEG 30
6. WalkerHG 29
7. ByrdBEG 28
8. HintonBEG 26
9. SunkettPS 24
10. GloverBEG 22
PorterBEG 22

Hits

Hits/Hits Allowed

1. ByrdBEG 133
2. WelmakerHG 124
3. StanleyNBY 104
4. PorterBEG 96
5. PartlowPS 95
6. HarrisPS 81
7. WalkerHG 78
8. GloverBEG 76
9. HookerNE 69
10. RicksPS 66

Strikeouts / Base On Balls

<strong>SO/W or SO/BB</strong><br>For recent years, pitching leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played.<br>No batting leaders computed.

1. ScantleburyNYC 4.500
2. BarnhillNYC 3.364
3. ByrdBEG 3.250
4. StanleyNBY 3.063
5. TiantNYC 3.000
6. HookerNE 2.900
7. NewcombeNE 2.714
8. BrownHG 2.500
9. PorterBEG 2.409
10. MorrisNYC 2.308

Home Runs per 9 IP

<strong>9 x HR / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. BlairHG 0.000
Wright2TM 0.000
TiantNYC 0.000
ScantleburyNYC 0.000
RicksPS 0.000
MorrisNYC 0.000
HookerNE 0.000
8. NewcombeNE 0.123
9. WalkerHG 0.124
10. HarrisPS 0.132

Losses

Losses

1. HarrisPS 8
2. StanleyNBY 7
3. HookerNE 6
4. MackNBY 5
ByrdBEG 5
6. AndersonNYC 4
PartlowPS 4
GloverBEG 4
WalkerHG 4
10. NewcombeNE 3
MorganBEG 3
DihigoNYC 3
MillerPS 3
PooleNBY 3
WalkerHG 3
BarnhillNYC 3
BrownHG 3

Earned Runs

Earned Runs Allowed

1. HarrisPS 46
2. ByrdBEG 45
3. MackNBY 42
4. GloverBEG 41
5. WelmakerHG 39
6. StanleyNBY 34
7. PartlowPS 33
8. PorterBEG 31
WalkerHG 31
10. MorganBEG 29

Wild Pitches

Wild Pitches

1. MorganBEG 3
TroyBEG 3
3. WalkerHG 2
MorrisNYC 2
BlaylockHG 2
6. GloverBEG 1
HarrisPS 1
HintonBEG 1
HopkinsNE 1
LewisHG 1
PeaceNE 1
RicksPS 1
TiantNYC 1
WelmakerHG 1
WilliamsNE 1
Wright2TM 1
NewcombeNE 1

Hit By Pitch

Times Hit by a Pitch.

1. HarrisPS 4
2. Wright2TM 3
PartlowPS 3
HoskinsHG 3
5. PooleNBY 2
NewcombeNE 2
PorterBEG 2
BarnhillNYC 2
RicksPS 2
HowardNYC 2
HopkinsNE 2
HintonBEG 2
GloverBEG 2
TroyBEG 2
WelmakerHG 2

Batters Faced

Batters Faced

1. WelmakerHG 558
2. ByrdBEG 551
3. PartlowPS 467
4. PorterBEG 408
5. StanleyNBY 382
6. WalkerHG 331
7. HarrisPS 320
8. NewcombeNE 310
9. RicksPS 304
10. GloverBEG 302

Games Finished

Games Finished<br>Credited to the last pitcher to appear for a team in a game.<br>Complete Games are not counted as Games Finished.

1. ScantleburyNYC 9
2. RicksPS 8
3. MackNBY 5
PartlowPS 5
5. WalkerHG 4
TroyBEG 4
StanleyNBY 4
HarrisPS 4
HintonBEG 4
MorrisNYC 4

Adjusted ERA+

<strong>ERA+</strong><br>100*[lgERA/ERA]<br>Adjusted to the player&#x2019;s ballpark(s).

1. BlairHG 438
2. Wright2TM 307
3. MorrisNYC 243
4. WelmakerHG 161
5. RicksPS 161
6. PartlowPS 159
7. MillerPS 154
8. PorterBEG 142
9. NewcombeNE 142
10. ByrdBEG 135

Fielding Independent Pitching

<strong>Fielding Independent Pitching</strong><br>this stat measures a pitcher's effectiveness at preventing HR, BB, HBP and causing SO<br><tt>(13*HR + 3*(BB+HBP) - 2*SO)/IP + Constant<sub>lg</sub></tt><br>The constant is set so that each season major-league average FIP is the same as the major-league avg ERA

1. TiantNYC 1.76
2. ScantleburyNYC 2.08
3. ByrdBEG 2.19
4. MorrisNYC 2.22
5. NewcombeNE 2.29
6. HookerNE 2.31
7. RicksPS 2.35
8. BlairHG 2.51
9. PartlowPS 2.57
10. Wright2TM 2.63

Adj. Pitching Runs

<strong>Adjusted Pitching Runs</strong><br>A set of formulas developed by Gary Gillette, Pete Palmer and others<br>that estimates a pitcher&#x2019;s total contributions<br>to a team&#x2019;s runs total via linear weights.<br>0.0 is an avg performance, <0 is worse than avg and >0 is better than avg

1. WelmakerHG 26
2. PartlowPS 21
3. ByrdBEG 17
4. BlairHG 16
5. Wright2TM 15
6. PorterBEG 12
7. RicksPS 12
8. MorrisNYC 11
9. NewcombeNE 9
10. StanleyNBY 9

Adj. Pitching Wins

<strong>Adjusted Pitching Wins</strong><br>A set of formulas developed by Gary Gillette, Pete Palmer and others<br>that estimates a pitcher&#x2019;s total contributions<br>to a team&#x2019;s wins with his arm.<br>0.0 is an avg performance, <0 is worse than avg and >0 is better than avg

1. WelmakerHG 2.7
2. PartlowPS 2.1
3. BlairHG 1.7
4. ByrdBEG 1.6
5. Wright2TM 1.6
6. MorrisNYC 1.2
7. PorterBEG 1.1
8. RicksPS 1.1
9. NewcombeNE 0.9
10. StanleyNBY 0.9

More 1945 Negro National League II Pages