National League Fielding Leaders

Putouts

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Grace • CHC 1,580
2. Bagwell • HOU 1,334
3. Murray • NYM 1,283
4. Clark • SFG 1,275
5. McGriff • SDP 1,219

Assists

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Sandberg • CHC 539
2. Bell • PIT 526
3. Lind • PIT 428
4. Smith • STL 420
5. Biggio • HOU 413

Errors Committed

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Offerman • LAD 42
2. Harris • LAD 27
3. Williams • SFG 23
4. Bell • PIT 22
5. Pendleton • ATL 19

Total Zone Runs

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Jackson • SDP 30
2. Justice • ATL 22
3. Gwynn • SDP 19
4. Gonzalez • HOU 16
5. Gilkey • STL 16

Def. Games as C

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Oliver • CIN 141
Daulton • PHI 141
3. Pagnozzi • STL 138
4. Hundley • NYM 121
5. Manwaring • SFG 108
Scioscia • LAD 108

Putouts as C

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Oliver • CIN 925
2. Daulton • PHI 760
3. Hundley • NYM 700
4. Pagnozzi • STL 688
5. Scioscia • LAD 641

Assists as C

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Scioscia • LAD 74
2. Daulton • PHI 69
3. Manwaring • SFG 68
4. Taubensee • HOU 66
5. Oliver • CIN 64

Errors Committed as C

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Santiago • SDP 12
2. Daulton • PHI 11
3. Scioscia • LAD 9
4. Oliver • CIN 8
5. O'Brien • NYM 7
Hernández • LAD 7

Double Plays Turned as C

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Manwaring • SFG 12
2. Pagnozzi • STL 10
3. Scioscia • LAD 8
Daulton • PHI 8
Olson • ATL 8
Oliver • CIN 8

Passed Balls

Passed Balls

1. Scioscia • LAD 14
2. Daulton • PHI 12
3. Taubensee • HOU 9
Berryhill • ATL 9
5. Girardi • CHC 8
Manwaring • SFG 8

Stolen Bases Allowed as C

Pre-1950 SB & CS data for catchers is estimated from catcher assists, games started and opposition stolen bases. From 1950 on SB, CS, Pickoff, & WP data for catchers and pitchers is taken from play-by-play accounts in the retrosheet files. There are several hundred games without pbp from 1950 to 1968 and for those we may not have any data.

1. Carter • MON 98
2. Hundley • NYM 89
3. Daulton • PHI 88
Oliver • CIN 88
5. Scioscia • LAD 87
Pagnozzi • STL 87

Caught Stealing as C

Pre-1950 SB & CS data for catchers is estimated from catcher assists, games started and opposition stolen bases. From 1950 on SB, CS, Pickoff, & WP data for catchers and pitchers is taken from play-by-play accounts in the retrosheet files. There are several hundred games without pbp from 1950 to 1968 and for those we may not have any data.

1. Daulton • PHI 49
2. Manwaring • SFG 47
Oliver • CIN 47
4. Olson • ATL 45
5. LaValliere • PIT 44

Caught Stealing %

Caught Stealing Percentage
CS / (SB + CS)

1. Manwaring • SFG 50.5
2. O'Brien • NYM 45.5
3. Girardi • CHC 41.0
4. Olson • ATL 39.1
5. LaValliere • PIT 38.3

Def. Games as 1B

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Bagwell • HOU 159
2. Grace • CHC 157
3. Murray • NYM 154
4. McGriff • SDP 151
5. Karros • LAD 143

Putouts as 1B

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Grace • CHC 1,580
2. Bagwell • HOU 1,334
3. Murray • NYM 1,283
4. Clark • SFG 1,275
5. McGriff • SDP 1,219

Assists as 1B

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Grace • CHC 141
2. Bagwell • HOU 133
3. Karros • LAD 126
4. McGriff • SDP 108
5. Clark • SFG 105

Errors Committed as 1B

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. McGriff • SDP 12
Murray • NYM 12
3. Bream • ATL 10
Clark • SFG 10
5. Karros • LAD 9

Double Plays Turned as 1B

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Clark • SFG 130
2. Grace • CHC 119
3. Bagwell • HOU 110
4. Murray • NYM 109
5. Karros • LAD 98

Def. Games as 2B

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Biggio • HOU 161
2. Sandberg • CHC 157
3. Lemke • ATL 145
4. Lind • PIT 134
DeShields • MON 134

Putouts as 2B

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Biggio • HOU 344
2. Lind • PIT 311
3. Thompson • SFG 296
4. Sandberg • CHC 283
5. DeShields • MON 251

Assists as 2B

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Sandberg • CHC 539
2. Lind • PIT 428
3. Biggio • HOU 413
4. Thompson • SFG 382
5. DeShields • MON 360

Errors Committed as 2B

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Stillwell • SDP 16
2. Thompson • SFG 15
DeShields • MON 15
4. Harris • LAD 14
5. Biggio • HOU 12

Double Plays Turned as 2B

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Thompson • SFG 101
2. Sandberg • CHC 94
3. Biggio • HOU 81
4. Lind • PIT 78
5. DeShields • MON 71

Def. Games as 3B

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Pendleton • ATL 158
2. Hollins • PHI 156
3. Sheffield • SDP 144
Williams • SFG 144
5. Buechele • 2TM 143

Putouts as 3B

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Pendleton • ATL 133
2. Hollins • PHI 120
3. Williams • SFG 105
4. Buechele • 2TM 102
Caminiti • HOU 102

Assists as 3B

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Pendleton • ATL 325
2. Sheffield • SDP 299
3. Williams • SFG 289
4. Buechele • 2TM 288
5. Hollins • PHI 253

Errors Committed as 3B

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Williams • SFG 23
2. Pendleton • ATL 19
3. Hollins • PHI 18
4. Buechele • 2TM 17
5. Sheffield • SDP 16

Double Plays Turned as 3B

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Williams • SFG 33
2. Pendleton • ATL 27
3. Sheffield • SDP 25
4. Hollins • PHI 22
5. Caminiti • HOU 19
Zeile • STL 19

Def. Games as SS

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Bell • PIT 159
2. Fernández • SDP 154
3. Offerman • LAD 149
4. Schofield • NYM 141
5. Larkin • CIN 140

Putouts as SS

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Bell • PIT 268
2. Fernández • SDP 240
3. Larkin • CIN 233
4. Smith • STL 232
5. Offerman • LAD 208

Assists as SS

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Bell • PIT 526
2. Smith • STL 420
3. Larkin • CIN 408
4. Fernández • SDP 405
5. Offerman • LAD 398

Errors Committed as SS

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Offerman • LAD 42
2. Bell • PIT 22
3. Belliard • ATL 14
4. Batiste • PHI 13
5. Larkin • CIN 11
Fernández • SDP 11
Cedeño • HOU 11
Clayton • SFG 11

Double Plays Turned as SS

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Bell • PIT 94
2. Smith • STL 82
3. Schofield • NYM 78
4. Offerman • LAD 74
5. Larkin • CIN 67

Def. Games as LF (s.1901)

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Bonds • PIT 139
2. Gant • ATL 138
3. Clark • SDP 115
4. Gonzalez • HOU 111
5. Gilkey • STL 110

Putouts as LF (s.1901)

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Bonds • PIT 310
2. Gonzalez • HOU 260
3. Clark • SDP 241
4. Gant • ATL 236
5. Gilkey • STL 216

Assists as LF (s.1901)

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Clark • SDP 9
2. Gilkey • STL 8
3. Rodríguez • LAD 6
4. Boston • NYM 5
Gonzalez • HOU 5

Errors Committed as LF (s.1901)

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. May • CHC 5
Gilkey • STL 5
3. Azócar • SDP 4
Gant • ATL 4
Davis • LAD 4

Double Plays Turned as LF (s.1901)

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Clark • SDP 3
Gilkey • STL 3
3. Coleman • NYM 2
James • SFG 2
Leonard • SFG 2
Rodríguez • LAD 2

Def. Games as CF (s.1901)

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Finley • HOU 160
2. Grissom • MON 157
3. Butler • LAD 155
4. Van Slyke • PIT 154
5. Lankford • STL 153

Putouts as CF (s.1901)

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Lankford • STL 439
2. Jackson • SDP 426
3. Van Slyke • PIT 421
4. Finley • HOU 417
5. Grissom • MON 402

Assists as CF (s.1901)

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Jackson • SDP 18
2. Van Slyke • PIT 11
3. Butler • LAD 9
4. Sanders • CIN 8
Finley • HOU 8

Errors Committed as CF (s.1901)

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Grissom • MON 7
2. Sosa • CHC 6
Sanders • CIN 6
4. Van Slyke • PIT 5
5. Javier • 2TM 3
Dykstra • PHI 3
Finley • HOU 3
Johnson • NYM 3

Double Plays Turned as CF (s.1901)

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Jackson • SDP 9
2. Dykstra • PHI 4
3. Butler • LAD 3
Finley • HOU 3
Sanders • CIN 3
Van Slyke • PIT 3

Def. Games as RF (s.1901)

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. O'Neill • CIN 143
2. Justice • ATL 140
3. Dawson • CHC 139
Walker • MON 139
5. Gwynn • SDP 127
José • STL 127

Putouts as RF (s.1901)

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Justice • ATL 313
2. O'Neill • CIN 291
3. José • STL 272
4. Gwynn • SDP 270
5. Walker • MON 269

Assists as RF (s.1901)

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Walker • MON 16
2. O'Neill • CIN 12
3. José • STL 11
Dawson • CHC 11
5. McGee • SFG 9
Gwynn • SDP 9

Errors Committed as RF (s.1901)

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Justice • ATL 8
2. McGee • SFG 6
José • STL 6
4. Anthony • HOU 5
Ashley • LAD 5
Braggs • CIN 5
Gwynn • SDP 5

Double Plays Turned as RF (s.1901)

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Walker • MON 3
Dawson • CHC 3
3. Gwynn • SDP 2
O'Neill • CIN 2
Justice • ATL 2

Def. Games as OF

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Finley • HOU 160
2. Grissom • MON 157
3. Butler • LAD 155
4. Van Slyke • PIT 154
5. Jackson • SDP 153
Lankford • STL 153

Putouts as OF

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Lankford • STL 438
2. Jackson • SDP 436
3. Van Slyke • PIT 421
4. Finley • HOU 417
5. Grissom • MON 401

Assists as OF

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Jackson • SDP 18
2. Walker • MON 16
3. O'Neill • CIN 12
4. Dawson • CHC 11
Van Slyke • PIT 11
Sanders • CIN 11
José • STL 11
McGee • SFG 11

Errors Committed as OF

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Justice • ATL 8
2. Grissom • MON 7
3. Ashley • LAD 6
José • STL 6
Sosa • CHC 6
Incaviglia • HOU 6
McGee • SFG 6
Braggs • CIN 6
Sanders • CIN 6

Double Plays Turned as OF

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Jackson • SDP 9
2. Sanders • CIN 4
Dykstra • PHI 4
Clark • SDP 4
5. Martinez • CIN 3
Gilkey • STL 3
Gallagher • NYM 3
Finley • HOU 3
Dawson • CHC 3
Butler • LAD 3
Van Slyke • PIT 3

Def. Games as P

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Boever • HOU 81
2. Jones • HOU 80
3. Hernandez • HOU 77
Pérez • STL 77
5. Innis • NYM 76

Putouts as P

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Maddux • CHC 30
2. Drabek • PIT 29
3. Hershiser • LAD 28
4. Belcher • CIN 23
Smoltz • ATL 23

Assists as P

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Maddux • CHC 64
2. Tomlin • PIT 52
3. Mulholland • PHI 47
4. Martínez • MON 45
Morgan • CHC 45

Errors Committed as P

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Jackson • 2TM 8
2. Gooden • NYM 6
3. Harris • SDP 5
Kile • HOU 5
5. Hill • MON 4
Martínez • MON 4

Double Plays Turned as P

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Olivares • STL 4
Drabek • PIT 4
Black • SFG 4
4. Swift • SFG 3
Nabholz • MON 3
Morgan • CHC 3
Candiotti • LAD 3
Smoltz • ATL 3
Tomlin • PIT 3
Martínez • MON 3
Hill • MON 3
Browning • CIN 3

Total Zone Runs as C (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Manwaring • SFG 15
2. O'Brien • NYM 8
3. LaValliere • PIT 6
4. Olson • ATL 5
Santiago • SDP 5

Range Factor/9Inn as C

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Hundley • NYM 7.54
2. Scioscia • LAD 7.44
3. Oliver • CIN 7.42
4. Carter • MON 7.21
5. Servais • HOU 7.09

Range Factor/Game as C

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Oliver • CIN 7.01
2. Scioscia • LAD 6.62
3. Carter • MON 6.27
4. Wilkins • CHC 6.23
5. Santiago • SDP 6.18

Fielding % as C

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Pagnozzi • STL .999
2. Olson • ATL .998
3. Berryhill • ATL .998
4. Hundley • NYM .996
5. LaValliere • PIT .994

Total Zone Runs as 1B (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Grace • CHC 8
2. Bagwell • HOU 6
3. Colbrunn • MON 3
4. Redus • PIT 2
5. Wallach • MON 2

Range Factor/9Inn as 1B

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Grace • CHC 10.95
2. Merced • PIT 10.30
3. Clark • SFG 10.10
4. Karros • LAD 10.02
5. Galarraga • STL 10.01

Range Factor/Game as 1B

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Grace • CHC 10.96
2. Clark • SFG 9.79
3. Karros • LAD 9.35
4. Galarraga • STL 9.32
5. Bagwell • HOU 9.23

Fielding % as 1B

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Morris • CIN .999
2. Grace • CHC .998
3. Bagwell • HOU .995
4. Merced • PIT .995
5. Karros • LAD .993

Total Zone Runs as 2B (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Sandberg • CHC 9
2. Alicea • STL 6
3. Thompson • SFG 4
4. Litton • SFG 3
5. Morandini • PHI 2

Range Factor/9Inn as 2B

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Harris • LAD 6.09
2. Thompson • SFG 5.80
3. Lind • PIT 5.59
4. Morandini • PHI 5.42
5. Sandberg • CHC 5.36

Range Factor/Game as 2B

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Thompson • SFG 5.65
2. Lind • PIT 5.51
3. Sandberg • CHC 5.24
4. Biggio • HOU 4.70
5. Stillwell • SDP 4.65

Fielding % as 2B

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Lind • PIT .992
2. Morandini • PHI .991
3. Sandberg • CHC .990
4. Biggio • HOU .984
5. Lemke • ATL .984

Total Zone Runs as 3B (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Williams • SFG 6
2. Wallach • MON 5
3. Pendleton • ATL 4
4. Barberie • MON 3
5. Wehner • PIT 3

Range Factor/9Inn as 3B

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Wallach • MON 3.08
2. Pendleton • ATL 2.97
3. Sheffield • SDP 2.87
4. Williams • SFG 2.84
5. Buechele • 2TM 2.83

Range Factor/Game as 3B

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Pendleton • ATL 2.90
2. Wallach • MON 2.82
3. Sheffield • SDP 2.76
4. Williams • SFG 2.74
5. Buechele • 2TM 2.73

Fielding % as 3B

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Caminiti • HOU .966
2. Sheffield • SDP .961
3. Zeile • STL .960
4. Pendleton • ATL .960
5. Buechele • 2TM .958

Total Zone Runs as SS (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Smith • STL 13
2. Schofield • NYM 11
3. Bell • PIT 5
Sánchez • CHC 5
5. Millette • PHI 4

Range Factor/9Inn as SS

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Smith • STL 5.07
2. Bell • PIT 5.06
3. Larkin • CIN 4.78
4. Schofield • NYM 4.69
5. Belliard • ATL 4.60

Range Factor/Game as SS

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Bell • PIT 4.99
2. Smith • STL 4.94
3. Larkin • CIN 4.58
4. Clayton • SFG 4.23
5. Schofield • NYM 4.23

Fielding % as SS

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Schofield • NYM .988
2. Smith • STL .985
3. Fernández • SDP .983
4. Larkin • CIN .983
5. Owen • MON .982

Total Zone Runs as LF (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Gilkey • STL 17
2. Gonzalez • HOU 16
3. Gant • ATL 10
4. Roberts • CIN 9
5. Clark • SDP 8

Range Factor/9Inn as LF (s.1948)

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Gonzalez • HOU 2.78
2. Gilkey • STL 2.48
3. Clark • SDP 2.35
4. Bonds • PIT 2.28
5. Bass • 2TM 2.06

Range Factor/Game as LF (s.1901)

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Gonzalez • HOU 2.39
2. Bonds • PIT 2.26
3. Clark • SDP 2.17
4. Gilkey • STL 2.04
5. Gant • ATL 1.73

Fielding % as LF (s.1901)

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Gonzalez • HOU .993
2. Bonds • PIT .991
3. Clark • SDP .988
4. Gant • ATL .984
5. Gilkey • STL .978

Total Zone Runs as CF (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Jackson • SDP 29
2. Finley • HOU 6
3. Sanders • ATL 6
4. Grissom • MON 5
5. Howell • NYM 5

Range Factor/9Inn as CF (s.1948)

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Nixon • ATL 3.24
2. Dykstra • PHI 3.11
3. Jackson • SDP 2.99
4. Lankford • STL 2.92
5. Lewis • SFG 2.85

Range Factor/Game as CF (s.1901)

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Dykstra • PHI 3.05
2. Jackson • SDP 2.92
3. Nixon • ATL 2.91
4. Lankford • STL 2.90
5. Van Slyke • PIT 2.81

Fielding % as CF (s.1901)

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Jackson • SDP .996
Lankford • STL .996
3. Butler • LAD .995
4. Finley • HOU .993
5. Van Slyke • PIT .989

Total Zone Runs as RF (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Justice • ATL 22
2. Gwynn • SDP 19
3. Walker • MON 10
4. McGee • SFG 6
5. O'Neill • CIN 5

Range Factor/9Inn as RF (s.1948)

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Justice • ATL 2.41
2. José • STL 2.28
3. O'Neill • CIN 2.25
4. Bonilla • NYM 2.23
5. Gwynn • SDP 2.23

Range Factor/Game as RF (s.1901)

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Justice • ATL 2.29
2. José • STL 2.23
3. Gwynn • SDP 2.20
4. O'Neill • CIN 2.12
5. Walker • MON 2.05

Fielding % as RF (s.1901)

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. O'Neill • CIN .997
2. Walker • MON .993
3. Bonilla • NYM .992
4. Dawson • CHC .992
5. Gwynn • SDP .982

Total Zone Runs as OF (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Jackson • SDP 30
2. Justice • ATL 22
3. Gwynn • SDP 19
4. Gonzalez • HOU 16
5. Gilkey • STL 16

Range Factor/9Inn as OF

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Nixon • ATL 3.17
2. Dykstra • PHI 3.11
3. Javier • 2TM 3.06
4. Jackson • SDP 3.01
5. Lankford • STL 2.91

Range Factor/Game as OF

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Nixon • ATL 3.05
2. Dykstra • PHI 3.05
3. Jackson • SDP 2.97
4. Lankford • STL 2.90
5. Van Slyke • PIT 2.81

Fielding % as OF

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. O'Neill • CIN .997
2. Jackson • SDP .996
3. Lankford • STL .996
4. Butler • LAD .995
5. Walker • MON .993

Range Factor/9Inn as P

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Maddux • CHC 3.16
2. Leibrandt • ATL 2.98
3. Hershiser • LAD 2.95
4. Swift • SFG 2.79
5. Tomlin • PIT 2.76

Range Factor/Game as P

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Maddux • CHC 2.69
2. Hershiser • LAD 2.09
3. Martínez • MON 2.03
4. Leibrandt • ATL 2.00
5. Drabek • PIT 1.91

Fielding % as P

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Black • SFG 1.000
Cormier • STL 1.000
Olivares • STL 1.000
Glavine • ATL 1.000
5. Tomlin • PIT .985

A ** by the stat's value indicates the player had fewer than the required number of at bats or plate appearances for the BA, OBP, SLG or OPS title that year. In order to rank the player, the necessary number of hitless at bats were added to the player's season total. The value printed here is their actual value and not the value used to rank them, therefore some numbers may appear out of order.

For rate stats, generally a minimum of 3.1 Plate Appearances/Team Game (batting), 1.0 IP/Team Game (pitching), 0.67 Gm and Chances/Team Game (fielding), 0.2 SB att/Team Game (catchers), 0.1 SB att/Team Game (baserunners only since 1951), and 0.1 decision/Team Game (W-L%) is needed for single-season leaderboards. For pitcher fielding the minimums are reduced by a third. For LF, CF, RF fielding stats, we only have reliable data since 1898, so all leaders are since 1898. Explanation of min. requirements