National League Pitching Leaders

Wins Above Replacement--all

<strong>Wins Above Replacement</strong><br>A single number that presents the number of wins the player added<br>to the team above what a replacement player (think AAA or AAAA) would add.<br>Scale for a single-season: 8+ MVP Quality, 5+ All-Star Quality, 2+ Starter,<br>0-2 Reserve, < 0 Replacement Level <br>Developed by Sean Smith of BaseballProjection.com

1. ScottHOU 8.2
2. RhodenPIT 7.6
3. GwynnSDP 6.7
4. SchmidtPHI 6.1
5. ValenzuelaLAD 6.1
6. SmithSTL 5.6
7. HernandezNYM 5.5
8. RainesMON 5.5
9. DavisCIN 5.3
10. BassHOU 5.2

WAR for Pitchers

<strong>Wins Above Replacement for Pitchers</strong><br>A single number that presents the number of wins the player added<br>to the team above what a replacement player (think AAA or AAAA) would add. This value includes defensive support and includes additional value for high leverage situations.<br>Scale: 8+ MVP Quality, 5+ All-Star Quality, 2+ Starter,<br>0-2 Reserve, < 0 Replacement Level <br> Developed by Sean Smith of BaseballProjection.com

1. ScottHOU 8.4
2. RhodenPIT 6.6
3. ValenzuelaLAD 5.5
4. OjedaNYM 4.7
5. DarlingNYM 4.6
6. GoodenNYM 4.5
7. GullicksonCIN 4.3
8. WelchLAD 4.0
9. RuffinPHI 3.7
10. YoumansMON 3.7

Earned Run Average

<strong>9 * ER / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played.<br>Bold indicates lowest ERA using current stats<br><span class=glimmer>Gold</span> means awarded ERA title at end of year.

1. ScottHOU 2.22
2. OjedaNYM 2.57
3. DarlingNYM 2.81
4. RhodenPIT 2.84
5. GoodenNYM 2.84
6. CoxSTL 2.90
7. TudorSTL 2.92
8. KrukowSFG 3.05
9. GarreltsSFG 3.11
10. KnepperHOU 3.14

Wins

Wins

1. ValenzuelaLAD 21
2. KrukowSFG 20
3. OjedaNYM 18
ScottHOU 18
5. GoodenNYM 17
KnepperHOU 17
7. FernandezNYM 16
8. DarlingNYM 15
GullicksonCIN 15
RhodenPIT 15

Win-Loss %

<strong>Win-Loss Percentage</strong><br>W / (W + L)<br>For players, leaders need one decision for every ten team games.<br>For managers, minimum to qualify for leading is 320 games.

1. OjedaNYM .783
2. GoodenNYM .739
3. FernandezNYM .727
4. DarlingNYM .714
5. DeshaiesHOU .706
6. KrukowSFG .690
7. TekulvePHI .688
8. ValenzuelaLAD .656
9. TudorSTL .650
10. ScottHOU .643

Walks & Hits per IP

<strong>(BB + H)/IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. ScottHOU 0.923
2. KrukowSFG 1.057
3. OjedaNYM 1.090
4. GoodenNYM 1.108
5. RyanHOU 1.129
6. RhodenPIT 1.131
7. CoxSTL 1.132
8. KnepperHOU 1.140
9. TudorSTL 1.142
10. ValenzuelaLAD 1.155

Hits per 9 IP

<strong>9 x H / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. ScottHOU 5.949
2. YoumansMON 5.959
3. RyanHOU 6.017
4. FernandezNYM 7.091
5. GoodenNYM 7.092
6. GarreltsSFG 7.463
7. RhodenPIT 7.486
8. KrukowSFG 7.494
9. ValenzuelaLAD 7.552
10. OjedaNYM 7.661

Bases On Balls per 9 IP

<strong>9 x BB / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. EckersleyCHC 1.925
2. SandersonCHC 1.963
3. KrukowSFG 2.020
4. WelchLAD 2.100
5. OjedaNYM 2.153
6. KnepperHOU 2.163
7. TudorSTL 2.178
8. GullicksonCIN 2.207
9. ScottHOU 2.354
10. HoneycuttLAD 2.368

Strikeouts per 9 IP

<strong>9 x SO / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. ScottHOU 10.002
2. RyanHOU 9.809
3. FernandezNYM 8.809
4. YoumansMON 8.301
5. ValenzuelaLAD 8.087
6. PalmerATL 7.297
7. GoodenNYM 7.200
8. WelchLAD 6.989
9. DarlingNYM 6.987
10. SandersonCHC 6.578

Games Played

Games Played or Pitched

1. LeffertsSDP 83
2. McDowellNYM 75
3. FrancoCIN 74
WorrellSTL 74
5. TekulvePHI 73
6. McCullersSDP 70
RobinsonCIN 70
8. BedrosianPHI 68
BurkeMON 68
10. DavisSFG 67

Saves

Saves

1. WorrellSTL 36
2. ReardonMON 35
3. SmithHOU 33
4. SmithCHC 31
5. BedrosianPHI 29
FrancoCIN 29
7. GarberATL 24
8. McDowellNYM 22
9. OroscoNYM 21
GossageSDP 21

Innings Pitched

Innings Pitched

1. ScottHOU 275.1
2. ValenzuelaLAD 269.1
3. KnepperHOU 258.0
4. RhodenPIT 253.2
5. GoodenNYM 250.0
6. KrukowSFG 245.0
7. GullicksonCIN 244.2
8. BrowningCIN 243.1
9. GrossPHI 241.2
10. MahlerATL 237.2

Strikeouts

Strikeouts

1. ScottHOU 306
2. ValenzuelaLAD 242
3. YoumansMON 202
4. FernandezNYM 200
GoodenNYM 200
6. RyanHOU 194
7. DarlingNYM 184
8. WelchLAD 183
9. KrukowSFG 178
10. PalmerATL 170

Games Started

Games Started

1. BrowningCIN 39
MahlerATL 39
3. KnepperHOU 38
4. GullicksonCIN 37
ScottHOU 37
6. GrossPHI 36
7. HawkinsSDP 35
HershiserLAD 35
PalmerATL 35
10. DarlingNYM 34
KrukowSFG 34
ReuschelPIT 34
RhodenPIT 34
ValenzuelaLAD 34

Complete Games

Complete Game

1. ValenzuelaLAD 20
2. RhodenPIT 12
GoodenNYM 12
4. KrukowSFG 10
5. KnepperHOU 8
CoxSTL 8
HershiserLAD 8
8. MahlerATL 7
OjedaNYM 7
RawleyPHI 7
ScottHOU 7
GrossPHI 7
WelchLAD 7

Shutouts

Shutouts<br>No runs allowed and a complete game.

1. KnepperHOU 5
ScottHOU 5
3. WelchLAD 3
ValenzuelaLAD 3
5. ReuschelPIT 2
BrowningCIN 2
KrukowSFG 2
OjedaNYM 2
TibbsMON 2
GullicksonCIN 2
GrossPHI 2
GoodenNYM 2
YoumansMON 2
DarlingNYM 2

Home Runs

Home Runs Hit/Allowed

1. GrossPHI 28
2. HoytSDP 27
3. BrowningCIN 26
4. MahlerATL 25
5. GullicksonCIN 24
HawkinsSDP 24
KrukowSFG 24
8. TudorSTL 22
9. DarlingNYM 21
EckersleyCHC 21
SandersonCHC 21

Bases on Balls

Bases on Balls/Walks

1. YoumansMON 118
2. SmithATL 105
3. PalmerATL 102
4. SutcliffeCHC 96
5. MahlerATL 95
6. GrossPHI 94
7. FernandezNYM 91
8. HershiserLAD 86
9. ValenzuelaLAD 85
10. BieleckiPIT 83

Hits

Hits/Hits Allowed

1. MahlerATL 283
2. GullicksonCIN 245
3. GrossPHI 240
4. KnepperHOU 232
ReuschelPIT 232
6. WelchLAD 227
7. EckersleyCHC 226
ValenzuelaLAD 226
9. BrowningCIN 225
10. HawkinsSDP 218

Strikeouts / Base On Balls

<strong>SO/W or SO/BB</strong><br>For recent years, pitching leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played.<br>No batting leaders computed.

1. ScottHOU 4.250
2. SandersonCHC 3.351
3. WelchLAD 3.327
4. KrukowSFG 3.236
5. EckersleyCHC 3.186
6. ValenzuelaLAD 2.847
7. OjedaNYM 2.846
8. GoodenNYM 2.500
9. RyanHOU 2.366
10. KnepperHOU 2.306

Home Runs per 9 IP

<strong>9 x HR / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. SmithATL 0.352
2. HoneycuttLAD 0.474
3. HershiserLAD 0.506
4. WelchLAD 0.535
5. ScottHOU 0.556
6. TibbsMON 0.567
7. FernandezNYM 0.573
8. CoxSTL 0.573
9. YoumansMON 0.575
10. ValenzuelaLAD 0.601

Losses

Losses

1. MahlerATL 18
2. ReuschelPIT 16
SmithATL 16
4. HershiserLAD 14
SutcliffeCHC 14
6. BrowningCIN 13
CoxSTL 13
LaCossSFG 13
WelchLAD 13
10. GrossPHI 12
GullicksonCIN 12
HowellLAD 12
KnepperHOU 12
RhodenPIT 12
YoumansMON 12

Earned Runs

Earned Runs Allowed

1. MahlerATL 129
2. GrossPHI 108
3. BrowningCIN 103
4. EckersleyCHC 102
5. HawkinsSDP 100
6. HershiserLAD 99
7. ReuschelPIT 95
8. ValenzuelaLAD 94
9. GullicksonCIN 92
SmithATL 92

Wild Pitches

Wild Pitches

1. RyanHOU 15
2. SutcliffeCHC 13
ValenzuelaLAD 13
4. HershiserLAD 12
WalkPIT 12
6. RobinsonSFG 11
7. YoumansMON 10
8. GarreltsSFG 9
PalmerATL 9
WinnPIT 9

Hit By Pitch

Times Hit by a Pitch.

1. GrossPHI 8
ReuschelPIT 8
3. AguileraNYM 7
McWilliamsPIT 7
WelchLAD 7
6. LaCossSFG 6
SmithMON 6
8. HawkinsSDP 5
HershiserLAD 5
PalmerATL 5
SiskNYM 5
SmithATL 5

Batters Faced

Batters Faced

1. ValenzuelaLAD 1,102
2. ScottHOU 1,065
3. MahlerATL 1,056
4. KnepperHOU 1,053
5. GrossPHI 1,040
6. GoodenNYM 1,020
7. BrowningCIN 1,016
8. RhodenPIT 1,015
9. GullicksonCIN 1,014
10. HershiserLAD 988

Games Finished

Games Finished<br>Credited to the last pitcher to appear for a team in a game.<br>Complete Games are not counted as Games Finished.

1. WorrellSTL 60
2. SmithCHC 59
3. BedrosianPHI 56
4. FrancoCIN 52
McDowellNYM 52
6. SmithHOU 51
7. GarberATL 48
ReardonMON 48
9. RobinsonPIT 41
10. OroscoNYM 40

Adjusted ERA+

<strong>ERA+</strong><br>100*[lgERA/ERA]<br>Adjusted to the player&#x2019;s ballpark(s).

1. ScottHOU 161
2. OjedaNYM 140
3. RhodenPIT 135
4. DarlingNYM 128
5. GoodenNYM 126
6. CoxSTL 126
7. TudorSTL 125
8. KrukowSFG 116
9. GarreltsSFG 114
10. KnepperHOU 114

Fielding Independent Pitching

<strong>Fielding Independent Pitching</strong><br>this stat measures a pitcher's effectiveness at preventing HR, BB, HBP and causing SO<br><tt>(13*HR + 3*(BB+HBP) - 2*SO)/IP + Constant<sub>lg</sub></tt><br>The constant is set so that each season major-league average FIP is the same as the major-league avg ERA

1. ScottHOU 2.16
2. WelchLAD 2.78
3. ValenzuelaLAD 2.80
4. FernandezNYM 3.01
5. OjedaNYM 3.05
6. GoodenNYM 3.06
7. RyanHOU 3.06
8. HoneycuttLAD 3.13
9. RhodenPIT 3.31
10. KrukowSFG 3.31

Adj. Pitching Runs

<strong>Adjusted Pitching Runs</strong><br>A set of formulas developed by Gary Gillette, Pete Palmer and others<br>that estimates a pitcher&#x2019;s total contributions<br>to a team&#x2019;s runs total via linear weights.<br>0.0 is an avg performance, <0 is worse than avg and >0 is better than avg

1. ScottHOU 45
2. RhodenPIT 31
3. OjedaNYM 24
4. DarlingNYM 21
5. GoodenNYM 20
6. RuffinPHI 19
7. TudorSTL 18
8. WorrellSTL 18
9. HortonSTL 18
10. MurphyCIN 17

Adj. Pitching Wins

<strong>Adjusted Pitching Wins</strong><br>A set of formulas developed by Gary Gillette, Pete Palmer and others<br>that estimates a pitcher&#x2019;s total contributions<br>to a team&#x2019;s wins with his arm.<br>0.0 is an avg performance, <0 is worse than avg and >0 is better than avg

1. ScottHOU 5.0
2. RhodenPIT 3.4
3. OjedaNYM 2.7
4. DarlingNYM 2.2
5. GoodenNYM 2.1
6. RuffinPHI 2.1
7. TudorSTL 1.9
8. HortonSTL 1.9
9. MurphyCIN 1.9
WorrellSTL 1.9

Base-Out Runs Saved (RE24)

<strong>Base-Out Runs Saved</strong><br>Given the bases occupied/out situation, how many runs did the pitcher<br>save in the resulting play. Compared to average, so 0 is average, and<br>above 0 is better than average

1. ScottHOU 52.92
2. RhodenPIT 35.68
3. OjedaNYM 29.20
4. DarlingNYM 25.23
5. GoodenNYM 22.93
6. WorrellSTL 21.07
7. KrukowSFG 20.84
8. TudorSTL 19.93
9. HortonSTL 19.86
10. MurphyCIN 19.86

Win Probability Added (WPA)

<strong>Win Probability Added by Pitcher</strong><br>Given average teams, this is the change in probability.<br>A change of +/- 1 would indicate one win added or lost.

1. ScottHOU 5.7
2. DarlingNYM 3.8
3. OjedaNYM 3.4
4. RhodenPIT 3.3
5. GoodenNYM 3.2
6. HortonSTL 3.1
7. TudorSTL 3.1
8. GarreltsSFG 3.1
9. KrukowSFG 3.0
10. WorrellSTL 3.0

Sit. Wins Saved (WPA/LI)

<strong>Situational Wins (WPA/LI)</strong><br>It is the sum of WPA divided by the leverage index for each play.<br>WPA depends greatly on the context of the at bats.<br>This stat does not.

1. ScottHOU 6.5
2. RhodenPIT 3.6
3. GoodenNYM 2.6
4. HortonSTL 2.3
5. ValenzuelaLAD 2.2
6. OjedaNYM 2.1
7. CoxSTL 2.1
8. KnepperHOU 2.0
9. TekulvePHI 1.9
10. ForschSTL 1.9
RyanHOU 1.9

Championship WPA (cWPA)

<strong>Championship Win Probability Added by Pitcher</strong><br>Given average teams, this is the change in probability, displayed in percentage points.<br>A change of +/- 100% would indicate one world series win added or lost.

1. ScottHOU 7.8
2. McDowellNYM 2.6
3. ReardonMON 2.4
4. GarreltsSFG 2.3
5. KnepperHOU 2.1
6. GarberATL 2.0
7. OjedaNYM 2.0
8. GoodenNYM 1.9
9. ShowSDP 1.9
10. OroscoNYM 1.7

Base-Out Wins Saved (REW)

<strong>Base-Out Wins Saved</strong><br>This is the number of wins above average the player was worth by their performance<br>measured by the 24 base-out situations.

1. ScottHOU 6.2
2. RhodenPIT 3.9
3. OjedaNYM 3.3
4. DarlingNYM 2.8
5. GoodenNYM 2.5
6. KrukowSFG 2.3
7. WorrellSTL 2.3
8. TudorSTL 2.2
9. ShowSDP 2.2
10. HortonSTL 2.1