National League Batting Leaders

Wins Above Replacement--all

<strong>Wins Above Replacement</strong><br>A single number that presents the number of wins the player added<br>to the team above what a replacement player (think AAA or AAAA) would add.<br>Scale for a single-season: 8+ MVP Quality, 5+ All-Star Quality, 2+ Starter,<br>0-2 Reserve, < 0 Replacement Level <br>Developed by Sean Smith of BaseballProjection.com

1. NiekroATL 10.4
2. ParkerPIT 7.0
3. BlueSFG 6.2
SchmidtPHI 6.2
5. ClarkSFG 5.9
6. CarterMON 5.8
7. KnepperSFG 5.8
8. BowaPHI 5.7
9. DennySTL 5.6
10. ValentineMON 5.6

WAR Position Players

<strong>Wins Above Replacement for position players</strong><br>A single number that presents the number of wins the player added<br>to the team above what a replacement player (think AAA or AAAA) would add.<br>Scale: 8+ MVP Quality, 5+ All-Star Quality, 2+ Starter,<br>0-2 Reserve, < 0 Replacement Level <br> Developed by Sean Smith of BaseballProjection.com

1. ParkerPIT 7.0
2. SchmidtPHI 6.2
3. ClarkSFG 5.9
4. CarterMON 5.8
5. BowaPHI 5.7
6. ValentineMON 5.6
7. SimmonsSTL 5.5
8. CeyLAD 5.3
9. CruzHOU 5.3
10. StearnsNYM 5.3

Offensive WAR

<strong>Offensive Wins Above Replacement (everything but Fielding)</strong><br>The same statistic as Wins Above Replacement for Position<br>Players (WAR), but with the fielding value excluded.<br>oWAR + dWAR does not equal WAR.<br>Adding would count positions twice.<br>Contains the factor for batting stats, baserunning, a positional adjustment, and the replacement player adjustment.<br> Factors developed by Sean Smith of BaseballProjection.com

1. ParkerPIT 6.9
2. BurroughsATL 5.5
3. SimmonsSTL 5.5
4. CruzHOU 5.4
5. ClarkSFG 5.3
6. LuzinskiPHI 5.3
7. WinfieldSDP 5.3
8. CeyLAD 5.2
9. MadlockSFG 5.1
10. SmithLAD 5.1

Defensive WAR

<strong>Defensive Wins Above Replacement for position players</strong><br>A defensive measure of wins above replacement, but given<br>only the defensive stats of the player and his position adjustment. For this calculation, we use a<br>replacement level on defense is the league average.<br>Based on Baseball Info Solutions defensive runs saved from 2003 on<br>and total zone rating developed by Sean Smith of BaseballProjection.com previously

1. BowaPHI 2.9
2. CarterMON 2.4
3. SpeierMON 2.2
4. MaddoxPHI 2.2
5. StearnsNYM 2.2
6. YeagerLAD 1.9
7. SchmidtPHI 1.8
8. CromartieMON 1.8
9. TempletonSTL 1.7
10. BoonePHI 1.7

Batting Average

<strong>Hits/At Bats</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 3.1 PA<br>per team game played<br>Bold indicates either highest BA using current stats<br>or awarded title at end of year.

1. ParkerPIT .334
2. GarveyLAD .316
3. CruzHOU .315
4. MadlockSFG .309
5. WinfieldSDP .308
6. RichardsSDP .308
7. ClarkSFG .306
8. RoseCIN .302
9. BucknerCHC .323 **
10. BurroughsATL .301

On-Base%

<strong>(H + BB + HBP)/(At Bats + BB + HBP + SF)</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 3.1 PA<br>per team game played

1. BurroughsATL .432
2. ParkerPIT .394
3. TenaceSDP .392
4. LuzinskiPHI .388
5. SmithLAD .382
6. RichardsSDP .381
7. CeyLAD .380
8. MadlockSFG .378
9. SimmonsSTL .377
10. MurcerCHC .376

Slugging %

Total Bases/At Bats or
(1B + 2*2B + 3*3B + 4*HR)/AB

For recent years, leaders need 3.1 PA
per team game played

1. ParkerPIT .585
2. SmithLAD .559
3. FosterCIN .546
4. ClarkSFG .537
5. BurroughsATL .529
6. LuzinskiPHI .526
7. SimmonsSTL .512
8. StargellPIT .567 **
9. GarveyLAD .499
10. WinfieldSDP .499

On-Base Plus Slugging

<strong>On-Base + Slugging Percentages </strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 3.1 PA<br>per team game played

1. ParkerPIT .979
2. BurroughsATL .961
3. SmithLAD .942
4. LuzinskiPHI .914
5. FosterCIN .906
6. ClarkSFG .895
7. SimmonsSTL .889
8. WinfieldSDP .866
9. MadlockSFG .859
10. GarveyLAD .852

Games Played

Games Played or Pitched

1. CabellHOU 162
GarveyLAD 162
3. de JesúsCHC 160
4. RoseCIN 159
CeyLAD 159
CashMON 159
CromartieMON 159
MontañezNYM 159
SmithSDP 159
EvansSFG 159
HernandezSTL 159

At Bats

At Bats

1. CabellHOU 660
2. CashMON 658
3. RoseCIN 655
4. BowaPHI 654
TaverasPIT 654
6. TempletonSTL 647
7. GarveyLAD 639
8. RussellLAD 625
9. de JesúsCHC 619
10. GriffeyCIN 614

Plate Appearances

<strong>Plate Appearances</strong><br>When available, we use actual plate appearances from play-by-play game accounts<br>Otherwise estimated using AB + BB + HBP + SF + SH,<br>which excludes catcher interferences.<br>When <span class=tooltip>this color</span> click for a summary of each PA.

1. RoseCIN 731
2. de JesúsCHC 712
3. CashMON 703
4. TaverasPIT 702
5. CabellHOU 694
6. BowaPHI 692
7. GarveyLAD 689
8. FosterCIN 687
9. GriffeyCIN 680
10. MontañezNYM 679

Runs Scored

Runs Scored/Allowed

1. de JesúsCHC 104
2. RoseCIN 103
3. ParkerPIT 102
4. FosterCIN 97
5. MorenoPIT 95
6. LopesLAD 93
SchmidtPHI 93
8. CabellHOU 92
9. GriffeyCIN 90
RichardsSDP 90
ClarkSFG 90
HernandezSTL 90

Hits

Hits/Hits Allowed

1. GarveyLAD 202
2. RoseCIN 198
3. CabellHOU 195
4. ParkerPIT 194
5. BowaPHI 192
6. TaverasPIT 182
7. WinfieldSDP 181
ClarkSFG 181
TempletonSTL 181
10. CromartieMON 180

Total Bases

<strong>Total Bases</strong><br>Singles + 2 x Doubles + 3 x Triples + 4 x Home Runs.

1. ParkerPIT 340
2. FosterCIN 330
3. GarveyLAD 319
4. ClarkSFG 318
5. WinfieldSDP 293
6. LuzinskiPHI 284
7. ValentineMON 279
8. RoseCIN 276
9. DawsonMON 269
10. SimmonsSTL 264

Doubles

Doubles Hit/Allowed

1. RoseCIN 51
2. ClarkSFG 46
3. SimmonsSTL 40
4. ParrishMON 39
5. PérezMON 38
6. GarveyLAD 36
RobinsonPIT 36
8. ValentineMON 35
9. CruzHOU 34
MaddoxPHI 34

Triples

Triples Hit/Allowed

1. TempletonSTL 13
2. ParkerPIT 12
RichardsSDP 12
4. CruzHOU 9
GarveyLAD 9
HendersonNYM 9
GarnerPIT 9
TaverasPIT 9
HerndonSFG 9
10. RoysterATL 8
GriffeyCIN 8
CabellHOU 8
DawsonMON 8
FlynnNYM 8
RandleNYM 8
YoungbloodNYM 8
ClarkSFG 8
MoralesSTL 8

Home Runs

Home Runs Hit/Allowed

1. FosterCIN 40
2. LuzinskiPHI 35
3. ParkerPIT 30
4. SmithLAD 29
5. KingmanCHC 28
StargellPIT 28
7. DawsonMON 25
ValentineMON 25
ClarkSFG 25
10. WinfieldSDP 24

Runs Batted In

Runs Batted In

1. FosterCIN 120
2. ParkerPIT 117
3. GarveyLAD 113
4. LuzinskiPHI 101
5. ClarkSFG 98
6. StargellPIT 97
WinfieldSDP 97
8. MontañezNYM 96
9. SmithLAD 93
10. CeyLAD 84

Bases on Balls

Bases on Balls/Walks

1. BurroughsATL 117
2. EvansSFG 105
3. TenaceSDP 101
4. LuzinskiPHI 100
5. CeyLAD 96
6. SchmidtPHI 91
7. HernandezSTL 82
8. MorenoPIT 81
9. MurcerCHC 80
10. MorganCIN 79

Strikeouts

Strikeouts

1. MurphyATL 145
2. FosterCIN 138
3. LuzinskiPHI 135
4. DawsonMON 128
5. KingmanCHC 111
6. HendersonNYM 109
7. RobinsonPIT 105
8. PérezMON 104
MorenoPIT 104
10. ParrishMON 103
SchmidtPHI 103

Stolen Bases

Stolen Bases

1. MorenoPIT 71
2. TaverasPIT 46
3. LopesLAD 45
4. de JesúsCHC 41
5. SmithSDP 40
6. CruzHOU 37
RichardsSDP 37
8. TempletonSTL 34
9. CabellHOU 33
MaddoxPHI 33

Singles

Singles Hit/Allowed

1. BowaPHI 153
2. CabellHOU 149
3. TaverasPIT 142
4. RussellLAD 140
5. de JesúsCHC 138
6. RoseCIN 137
7. GarveyLAD 136
8. PuhlHOU 135
TempletonSTL 135
10. CashMON 134

Adjusted OPS+

<strong>OPS+</strong><br>100*[OBP/lg OBP + SLG/lg SLG - 1]<br>Adjusted to the player&#x2019;s ballpark(s)

1. ParkerPIT 166
2. SmithLAD 162
3. BurroughsATL 156
4. LuzinskiPHI 153
5. ClarkSFG 152
6. FosterCIN 151
7. WinfieldSDP 151
8. SimmonsSTL 148
9. MadlockSFG 144
10. CruzHOU 142

Runs Created

<strong>Runs Created</strong><br>A set of formulas developed by Bill James and others<br>that estimates a player&#x2019;s total contributions<br>to a team&#x2019;s runs total.<br>This is computed with the "technical" formula when possible.<br>If SB or CS data is missing, the "basic" formula is used.<br>If HBP, IBB, SH, SF, or GIDP data is missing, the "stolen base" version of the formula is used. <br>Team Runs Created is the sum of player Runs Created.

1. ParkerPIT 134
2. BurroughsATL 116
3. FosterCIN 115
4. LuzinskiPHI 114
5. ClarkSFG 109
6. GarveyLAD 108
7. WinfieldSDP 105
8. RoseCIN 102
CruzHOU 102
SmithLAD 102

Adj. Batting Runs

<strong>Adjusted Batting Runs</strong><br>A set of formulas developed by Gary Gillette, Pete Palmer and others<br>that estimates a player&#x2019;s total contributions<br>to a team&#x2019;s runs total via linear weights.<br>0.0 is an avg performance, <0 is worse than avg and >0 is better than avg

1. ParkerPIT 50
2. BurroughsATL 45
3. LuzinskiPHI 42
4. ClarkSFG 40
5. SmithLAD 40
6. FosterCIN 39
7. WinfieldSDP 38
8. SimmonsSTL 36
9. CruzHOU 31
10. StargellPIT 30

Adj. Batting Wins

<strong>Adjusted Batting Wins</strong><br>A set of formulas developed by Gary Gillette, Pete Palmer and others<br>that estimates a player&#x2019;s total contributions<br>to a team&#x2019;s wins with his bat.<br>0.0 is an avg performance, <0 is worse than avg and >0 is better than avg

1. ParkerPIT 5.0
2. BurroughsATL 4.5
3. LuzinskiPHI 4.3
4. ClarkSFG 4.1
5. SmithLAD 4.0
6. FosterCIN 4.0
7. WinfieldSDP 3.9
8. SimmonsSTL 3.7
9. CruzHOU 3.2
10. StargellPIT 3.1

Extra Base Hits

<strong>Extra Base Hits</strong><br>Doubles + Triples + Home Runs

1. ClarkSFG 79
2. ParkerPIT 74
3. FosterCIN 73
4. LuzinskiPHI 69
5. SimmonsSTL 67
6. GarveyLAD 66
7. ValentineMON 62
8. RoseCIN 61
9. BurroughsATL 59
WinfieldSDP 59

Times On Base

<strong>Times on Base</strong><br>Hits + Bases on Balls + Hit By Pitch<br>Does not include Reached on Error or Catcher Interference.

1. BurroughsATL 264
2. RoseCIN 263
3. LuzinskiPHI 254
4. CeyLAD 253
ParkerPIT 253
6. de JesúsCHC 248
7. FosterCIN 247
8. GarveyLAD 243
9. RichardsSDP 239
10. WinfieldSDP 238
EvansSFG 238

Offensive Win %

<strong>Offensive Winning Percentage</strong><br>The percentage of games a team with nine of this player<br>batting would win. Assumes average pitching and defense.<br>This uses the Pythagorean win pct formula with the player's RC/G for runs scored and the league's R/9 as runs allowed.

1. ParkerPIT .799
2. BurroughsATL .786
3. SmithLAD .770
4. LuzinskiPHI .735
5. MadlockSFG .709
6. FosterCIN .702
7. CruzHOU .701
8. SimmonsSTL .699
9. ClarkSFG .692
10. WinfieldSDP .691

Hit By Pitch

Times Hit by a Pitch.

1. DawsonMON 12
2. LuzinskiPHI 11
TenaceSDP 11
4. HebnerPHI 9
5. StearnsNYM 8
6. FosterCIN 7
CeyLAD 7
CromartieMON 7
StargellPIT 7
10. OfficeATL 6
KingmanCHC 6
GambleSDP 6

Sacrifice Hits

Sacrifice Hits (Sacrifice Bunts)

1. SmithSDP 28
2. HootonLAD 18
3. MorenoPIT 17
WhitfieldSFG 17
5. de JesúsCHC 15
6. SuttonLAD 14
LeMasterSFG 14
8. SeaverCIN 13
RauLAD 13
PerrySDP 13
HerndonSFG 13

Sacrifice Flies

Sacrifice Flies
First tracked in 1954.

1. SmithLAD 13
2. MorganCIN 11
WatsonHOU 11
RobinsonPIT 11
5. EvansSFG 10
6. HornerATL 9
MontañezNYM 9
ClarkSFG 9
9. TrilloCHC 8
GarveyLAD 8
BoonePHI 8
SchmidtPHI 8
SimmonsSTL 8

Intentional Bases on Balls

<strong>Intentional Bases on Balls</strong><br>First tracked in 1955.

1. ParkerPIT 23
2. WinfieldSDP 20
3. MontañezNYM 19
4. SimmonsSTL 17
5. FosterCIN 16
WatsonHOU 16
HebnerPHI 16
8. MurcerCHC 15
LuzinskiPHI 15
10. BurroughsATL 12
SchmidtPHI 12
GarnerPIT 12
EvansSFG 12

Double Plays Grounded Into

<strong>Double Plays Grounded Into</strong><br>Only includes standard 6-4-3, 4-3, etc. double plays.<br>First tracked in 1933.<br>For gamelogs only in seasons we have play-by-play, we include triple plays as well.<br>All official seasonal totals do not include GITP's.

1. HendersonNYM 24
2. ParrishMON 19
SimmonsSTL 19
4. FosterCIN 18
WatsonHOU 18
GarnerPIT 18
7. GarveyLAD 17
RussellLAD 17
9. BurroughsATL 16
MatthewsATL 16
BucknerCHC 16
CashMON 16

Caught Stealing

Caught Stealing

1. TaverasPIT 25
2. MorenoPIT 22
3. RoysterATL 17
RichardsSDP 17
5. CabellHOU 15
6. PuhlHOU 14
GarnerPIT 14
8. MazzilliNYM 13
StearnsNYM 13
10. de JesúsCHC 12
SmithSDP 12

SB %

Stolen Base Percentage
SB / (SB + CS)

1. CedeñoHOU 92.00
2. LopesLAD 91.84
3. McBridePHI 90.32
4. SextonHOU 88.89
5. BowaPHI 84.38
6. MaddoxPHI 82.50
7. GriffeyCIN 82.14
8. CruzHOU 80.44
9. MorganCIN 79.17
10. de JesúsCHC 77.36

Power-Speed #

<strong>Power/Speed Number</strong><br>2 x (Home Runs x Stolen Bases)/(Stolen Bases + Home Runs)<br>The harmonic mean of HR and SB.<br>To do well you need a lot of both.<br>Developed by Bill James.

1. DawsonMON 26.4
2. LopesLAD 24.7
3. ParkerPIT 24.0
4. WinfieldSDP 22.4
5. DriessenCIN 20.4
6. SchmidtPHI 20.0
7. StearnsNYM 18.8
ClarkSFG 18.8
9. MazzilliNYM 17.8
10. ValentineMON 17.1

AB per SO

<strong>At Bats Per Strikeout</strong><br>For career marks this only includes AB&#x2019;s for seasons where SO&#x2019;s were tracked.

1. CashMON 22.7
2. RoseCIN 21.8
3. RussellLAD 18.4
4. BowaPHI 16.4
5. SmithSDP 13.7
6. SimmonsSTL 13.2
7. PuhlHOU 12.7
8. MadlockSFG 11.5
9. MorganCIN 11.0
10. TaverasPIT 10.9

AB per HR

<strong>At Bats Per Home Run</strong>

1. FosterCIN 15.1
2. SmithLAD 15.4
3. LuzinskiPHI 15.4
4. StargellPIT 13.9 **
5. KingmanCHC 14.1 **
6. BenchCIN 17.1 **
7. ParkerPIT 19.4
8. HornerATL 14.0 **
9. BurroughsATL 21.2
10. ValentineMON 22.8

Outs Made

<strong>Outs Made</strong><br>(At Bats - Hits) + Double Plays Grounded Into <br>+ Sac. Flies + Sac. Hits + Caught Stealing.

1. CashMON 522
2. TaverasPIT 515
3. CabellHOU 501
4. SmithSDP 492
5. TempletonSTL 489
6. de JesúsCHC 488
7. BowaPHI 486
8. RussellLAD 484
9. RoseCIN 483
10. DawsonMON 482

Base-Out Runs Added (RE24)

<strong>Base-Out Runs Added</strong><br>Given the bases occupied/out situation, how many runs did the batter<br> or baserunner add in the resulting play.<br>Compared to average, so 0 is average, and above 0 is better than average

1. ParkerPIT 71.17
2. LuzinskiPHI 49.34
3. BurroughsATL 46.75
4. GarveyLAD 46.51
5. ClarkSFG 42.84
6. SmithLAD 41.91
7. StargellPIT 41.68
8. FosterCIN 41.12
9. CruzHOU 41.11
10. WinfieldSDP 38.42

Win Probability Added (WPA)

<strong>Win Probability Added for Offensive Player</strong><br>Given average teams, this is the change in probability<br>caused by this batter during the game.<br>A change of +/- 1 would indicate one win added or lost.

1. ParkerPIT 6.4
2. FosterCIN 5.9
3. GarveyLAD 5.4
4. CruzHOU 5.1
5. WinfieldSDP 4.5
6. SmithLAD 4.4
7. ClarkSFG 4.4
8. BurroughsATL 4.4
9. LuzinskiPHI 4.3
10. StargellPIT 3.6

Situ. Wins Added (WPA/LI)

<strong>Situational Wins (WPA/LI)</strong><br>It is the sum of WPA divided by the leverage index for each play.<br>WPA depends greatly on the context of the at bats.<br>This stat does not.

1. ParkerPIT 6.3
2. BurroughsATL 5.4
3. LuzinskiPHI 4.6
4. FosterCIN 4.4
5. SmithLAD 4.4
6. ClarkSFG 4.1
7. GarveyLAD 4.0
8. WinfieldSDP 3.7
9. StargellPIT 3.7
10. CruzHOU 3.6

Championship WPA (cWPA)

<strong>Championship Win Probability Added for Offensive Player</strong><br>Given average teams, this is the change in probability, displayed in percentage points.<br>A change of +/- 100% would indicate one world series win added or lost.

1. LuzinskiPHI 13.7
2. ParkerPIT 10.9
3. GarveyLAD 7.3
4. ClarkSFG 6.4
5. SmithLAD 6.3
6. MaddoxPHI 6.1
7. FosterCIN 5.2
8. LopesLAD 4.3
9. BakerLAD 4.3
10. MurcerCHC 3.9

Base-Out Wins Added (REW)

<strong>Base-Out Wins Added (REW)</strong><br>This is the number of wins above average the player was worth by their performance measured by the 24 <br>base-out situations across every play in the game.

1. ParkerPIT 7.0
2. LuzinskiPHI 5.0
3. GarveyLAD 4.7
4. BurroughsATL 4.5
5. ClarkSFG 4.4
6. CruzHOU 4.4
7. SmithLAD 4.3
8. FosterCIN 4.2
9. StargellPIT 4.1
10. WinfieldSDP 4.1

rOBA

rOBA
A measure of a player's offensive contributions, weighted in proportion to each event's actual run value

1. ParkerPIT .441
2. BurroughsATL .434
3. SmithLAD .418
4. LuzinskiPHI .415
5. ClarkSFG .404
6. FosterCIN .403
7. MadlockSFG .399
8. CruzHOU .397
9. SimmonsSTL .395
10. WinfieldSDP .392

Rbat+

Rbat+
Batting runs as computed for WAR, but indexed to the environment the player played in, where 100 is league average.

1. ParkerPIT 181
2. BurroughsATL 172
3. SmithLAD 170
4. LuzinskiPHI 168
5. ClarkSFG 165
6. FosterCIN 160
7. WinfieldSDP 159
8. MadlockSFG 159
9. TenaceSDP 156
10. CruzHOU 156