National League Fielding Leaders

Putouts

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Banks • CHC 1,383
2. Cepeda • STL 1,304
3. McCovey • SFG 1,221
4. Clendenon • PIT 1,199
5. Kranepool • NYM 1,137

Assists

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Lanier • SFG 519
2. Alley • PIT 500
3. Mazeroski • PIT 498
4. Maxvill • STL 486
5. Harrelson • NYM 467

Errors Committed

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Allen • PHI 35
Jackson • HOU 35
3. Harrelson • NYM 32
4. Shannon • STL 29
5. Santo • CHC 26
Alley • PIT 26

Total Zone Runs

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Lanier • SFG 23
2. Santo • CHC 18
3. Harper • CIN 12
4. Fuentes • SFG 11
5. McCarver • STL 10

Def. Games as C

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Hundley • CHC 152
2. Haller • SFG 136
3. McCarver • STL 130
4. Grote • NYM 119
5. Torre • ATL 114

Putouts as C

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Hundley • CHC 865
2. McCarver • STL 819
3. Haller • SFG 797
4. Grote • NYM 609
5. Torre • ATL 580

Assists as C

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. McCarver • STL 67
2. Haller • SFG 64
3. Torre • ATL 63
4. Grote • NYM 62
5. Roseboro • LAD 60

Errors Committed as C

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Uecker • 2TM 11
2. Roseboro • LAD 10
3. Oliver • 2TM 9
4. Grote • NYM 7
5. Bateman • HOU 6
Torre • ATL 6
Pavletich • CIN 6

Double Plays Turned as C

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Torre • ATL 12
2. McCarver • STL 10
3. May • PIT 9
4. Grote • NYM 8
5. Dalrymple • PHI 7
Hundley • CHC 7

Passed Balls

Passed Balls

1. Uecker • 2TM 27
2. Torre • ATL 16
3. Haller • SFG 15
4. Grote • NYM 12
5. Bateman • HOU 10

Stolen Bases Allowed as C

Pre-1950 SB & CS data for catchers is estimated from catcher assists, games started and opposition stolen bases. From 1950 on SB, CS, Pickoff, & WP data for catchers and pitchers is taken from play-by-play accounts in the retrosheet files. There are several hundred games without pbp from 1950 to 1968 and for those we may not have any data.

1. Haller • SFG 56
2. Hundley • CHC 48
Torre • ATL 48
4. Oliver • 2TM 40
5. Pavletich • CIN 39

Caught Stealing as C

Pre-1950 SB & CS data for catchers is estimated from catcher assists, games started and opposition stolen bases. From 1950 on SB, CS, Pickoff, & WP data for catchers and pitchers is taken from play-by-play accounts in the retrosheet files. There are several hundred games without pbp from 1950 to 1968 and for those we may not have any data.

1. Torre • ATL 42
2. McCarver • STL 37
Grote • NYM 37
4. Haller • SFG 33
5. Hundley • CHC 32

Caught Stealing %

Caught Stealing Percentage
CS / (SB + CS)

1. Dalrymple • PHI 57.7
2. McCarver • STL 55.2
3. Torborg • LAD 51.4
4. Grote • NYM 49.3
5. Torre • ATL 46.7

Def. Games as 1B

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Cepeda • STL 151
2. Banks • CHC 147
3. Kranepool • NYM 139
4. McCovey • SFG 127
5. Clendenon • PIT 123

Putouts as 1B

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Banks • CHC 1,383
2. Cepeda • STL 1,304
3. McCovey • SFG 1,221
4. Clendenon • PIT 1,199
5. Kranepool • NYM 1,137

Assists as 1B

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Banks • CHC 91
2. Cepeda • STL 90
3. Clendenon • PIT 89
4. Kranepool • NYM 87
5. McCovey • SFG 81

Errors Committed as 1B

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Clendenon • PIT 15
McCovey • SFG 15
3. Banks • CHC 10
Cepeda • STL 10
Kranepool • NYM 10

Double Plays Turned as 1B

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Clendenon • PIT 122
2. Banks • CHC 111
3. Kranepool • NYM 103
Cepeda • STL 103
5. McCovey • SFG 102

Def. Games as 2B

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Mazeroski • PIT 163
2. Beckert • CHC 144
3. Javier • STL 138
4. Rojas • PHI 137
5. Fuentes • SFG 130
Morgan • HOU 130

Putouts as 2B

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Mazeroski • PIT 417
2. Beckert • CHC 327
3. Javier • STL 311
4. Morgan • HOU 297
5. Rojas • PHI 282

Assists as 2B

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Mazeroski • PIT 498
2. Beckert • CHC 422
3. Rojas • PHI 360
4. Javier • STL 352
5. Morgan • HOU 344

Errors Committed as 2B

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Beckert • CHC 25
2. Javier • STL 24
3. Mazeroski • PIT 18
4. Rojas • PHI 15
5. Morgan • HOU 14

Double Plays Turned as 2B

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Mazeroski • PIT 131
2. Rojas • PHI 92
3. Beckert • CHC 89
4. Woodward • ATL 81
5. Fuentes • SFG 79

Def. Games as 3B

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Santo • CHC 161
2. Boyer • ATL 150
3. Wills • PIT 144
4. Pérez • CIN 139
5. Aspromonte • HOU 133

Putouts as 3B

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Santo • CHC 187
2. Boyer • ATL 166
3. Aspromonte • HOU 130
4. Pérez • CIN 113
5. Wills • PIT 98

Assists as 3B

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Santo • CHC 393
2. Wills • PIT 343
3. Boyer • ATL 291
4. Allen • PHI 249
5. Shannon • STL 239

Errors Committed as 3B

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Allen • PHI 35
2. Shannon • STL 29
3. Santo • CHC 26
4. Wills • PIT 24
5. Charles • NYM 17

Double Plays Turned as 3B

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Santo • CHC 33
2. Wills • PIT 31
3. Boyer • ATL 30
4. Allen • PHI 23
5. Shannon • STL 18

Def. Games as SS

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Harrelson • NYM 149
2. Maxvill • STL 148
3. Alley • PIT 146
4. Kessinger • CHC 143
5. Lanier • SFG 137

Putouts as SS

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Alley • PIT 257
2. Harrelson • NYM 254
3. Maxvill • STL 236
4. Kessinger • CHC 215
5. Jackson • HOU 204

Assists as SS

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Alley • PIT 500
2. Maxvill • STL 470
3. Harrelson • NYM 467
4. Kessinger • CHC 457
5. Lanier • SFG 440

Errors Committed as SS

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Jackson • HOU 35
2. Harrelson • NYM 32
3. Alley • PIT 26
4. Menke • ATL 19
Maxvill • STL 19
Kessinger • CHC 19

Double Plays Turned as SS

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Alley • PIT 105
2. Wine • PHI 90
3. Harrelson • NYM 88
4. Kessinger • CHC 77
5. Maxvill • STL 74

Def. Games as LF (s.1901)

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Williams • CHC 160
2. Brock • STL 157
3. Davis • NYM 149
4. Rose • CIN 124
5. González • PHI 106

Putouts as LF (s.1901)

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Brock • STL 276
2. Williams • CHC 269
3. Davis • NYM 232
4. Rose • CIN 213
5. González • PHI 184

Assists as LF (s.1901)

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Stargell • PIT 13
2. Brock • STL 12
3. Johnson • LAD 7
Carty • ATL 7
Davis • HOU 7

Errors Committed as LF (s.1901)

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Brock • STL 13
2. Stargell • PIT 10
3. Carty • ATL 9
4. Alou • SFG 6
Davis • NYM 6

Double Plays Turned as LF (s.1901)

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Carty • ATL 3
2. Brock • STL 2
Davis • HOU 2
4. Alou • SFG 1
Hart • SFG 1
May • CIN 1
Miller • HOU 1
Mota • PIT 1
Pagán • PIT 1
Reynolds • NYM 1
Stargell • PIT 1
Williams • CHC 1

Def. Games as CF (s.1901)

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Wynn • HOU 157
Pinson • CIN 157
3. Phillips • CHC 141
4. Davis • LAD 138
5. Alou • PIT 134
Mays • SFG 134

Putouts as CF (s.1901)

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Wynn • HOU 362
2. Pinson • CIN 338
3. Phillips • CHC 334
4. Flood • STL 315
5. Davis • LAD 302

Assists as CF (s.1901)

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Phillips • CHC 11
2. Alou • PIT 9
3. Lock • PHI 7
Davis • LAD 7
5. Jones • ATL 6

Errors Committed as CF (s.1901)

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Wynn • HOU 12
2. Davis • LAD 9
3. Mays • SFG 7
Phillips • CHC 7
5. Pinson • CIN 5

Double Plays Turned as CF (s.1901)

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Alou • PIT 3
2. Davis • LAD 2
Jones • NYM 2
Lock • PHI 2
Pinson • CIN 2

Def. Games as RF (s.1901)

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Callison • PHI 147
2. Staub • HOU 144
Clemente • PIT 144
4. Aaron • ATL 142
5. Maris • STL 118

Putouts as RF (s.1901)

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Aaron • ATL 296
2. Callison • PHI 286
3. Clemente • PIT 274
4. Staub • HOU 270
5. Maris • STL 221

Assists as RF (s.1901)

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Clemente • PIT 19
2. Aaron • ATL 11
Callison • PHI 11
4. Staub • HOU 10
5. Swoboda • NYM 8
Fairly • LAD 8

Errors Committed as RF (s.1901)

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Staub • HOU 11
2. Clemente • PIT 9
Swoboda • NYM 9
4. Callison • PHI 7
Aaron • ATL 7

Double Plays Turned as RF (s.1901)

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Clemente • PIT 4
2. Aaron • ATL 2
Johnson • STL 2
Staub • HOU 2
5. Alou • SFG 1
Callison • PHI 1
Fairly • LAD 1
González • PHI 1
Harper • CIN 1
Jones • NYM 1
Landis • HOU 1
Maris • STL 1
Raudman • CHC 1
Shamsky • CIN 1
Swoboda • NYM 1
Luplow • 2TM 1

Def. Games as OF

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Williams • CHC 162
2. Pinson • CIN 157
Wynn • HOU 157
Brock • STL 157
5. Aaron • ATL 152

Putouts as OF

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Wynn • HOU 364
2. Pinson • CIN 341
3. Phillips • CHC 340
4. Aaron • ATL 321
5. Flood • STL 314

Assists as OF

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Clemente • PIT 17
2. Phillips • CHC 13
3. Aaron • ATL 12
Callison • PHI 12
Brock • STL 12
Stargell • PIT 12

Errors Committed as OF

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Brock • STL 13
2. Wynn • HOU 12
3. Alou • SFG 11
Staub • HOU 11
5. Stargell • PIT 10

Double Plays Turned as OF

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Clemente • PIT 4
2. Alou • PIT 3
Aaron • ATL 3
Carty • ATL 3
Jones • NYM 3

Def. Games as P

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Abernathy • CIN 70
Perranoski • LAD 70
3. Willis • STL 65
4. Face • PIT 61
5. Hoerner • STL 57
Linzy • SFG 57
Farrell • 2TM 57

Putouts as P

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Jackson • PHI 21
2. Jenkins • CHC 20
Perry • SFG 20
4. Gibson • STL 19
5. Ribant • PIT 18
Sisk • PIT 18

Assists as P

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Drysdale • LAD 64
Jackson • PHI 64
Perry • SFG 64
4. Osteen • LAD 53
5. Jenkins • CHC 49

Errors Committed as P

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Drysdale • LAD 5
Jackson • PHI 5
Sadecki • SFG 5
Singer • LAD 5
5. Jarvis • ATL 4
Abernathy • CIN 4
Niekro • ATL 4

Double Plays Turned as P

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Herbel • SFG 7
2. Jackson • PHI 6
3. Willis • STL 5
4. Jenkins • CHC 4
Carroll • ATL 4
Wise • PHI 4
Niekro • ATL 4
Sisk • PIT 4
Washburn • STL 4

Total Zone Runs as C (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. McCarver • STL 10
2. Dalrymple • PHI 9
3. Torre • ATL 5
4. Hundley • CHC 4
Torborg • LAD 4

Range Factor/9Inn as C

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Edwards • CIN 8.40
2. Bateman • HOU 7.87
3. Brand • HOU 7.65
4. Dalrymple • PHI 7.61
5. Pavletich • CIN 7.36

Range Factor/Game as C

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Bateman • HOU 7.45
2. McCarver • STL 6.82
3. Edwards • CIN 6.63
4. Brand • HOU 6.46
5. Dalrymple • PHI 6.36

Fielding % as C

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. McCarver • STL .997
2. Haller • SFG .997
3. Hundley • CHC .996
4. Dalrymple • PHI .994
5. May • PIT .993

Total Zone Runs as 1B (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. May • CIN 5
2. Cepeda • STL 4
3. Swoboda • NYM 3
4. Torre • ATL 2
5. Joseph • PHI 2

Range Factor/9Inn as 1B

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Clendenon • PIT 10.79
2. McCovey • SFG 10.57
3. Banks • CHC 10.34
4. Parker • LAD 10.14
5. Kranepool • NYM 10.02

Range Factor/Game as 1B

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Clendenon • PIT 10.47
2. McCovey • SFG 10.25
3. Banks • CHC 10.03
4. Alou • ATL 9.44
5. Cepeda • STL 9.23

Fielding % as 1B

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Parker • LAD .996
2. Banks • CHC .993
3. Cepeda • STL .993
4. Kranepool • NYM .992
5. McCovey • SFG .989

Total Zone Runs as 2B (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Fuentes • SFG 12
2. Mazeroski • PIT 8
3. Lanier • SFG 7
4. Lefebvre • LAD 4
5. Schroder • SFG 4
Popovich • CHC 4

Range Factor/9Inn as 2B

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Mazeroski • PIT 5.73
2. Fuentes • SFG 5.72
3. Woodward • ATL 5.61
4. Beckert • CHC 5.27
5. Buchek • NYM 5.19

Range Factor/Game as 2B

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Mazeroski • PIT 5.61
2. Beckert • CHC 5.20
3. Woodward • ATL 5.08
4. Morgan • HOU 4.93
5. Hunt • LAD 4.83

Fielding % as 2B

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Woodward • ATL .982
2. Mazeroski • PIT .981
3. Fuentes • SFG .980
4. Morgan • HOU .979
5. Rojas • PHI .977

Total Zone Runs as 3B (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Santo • CHC 18
2. Davenport • SFG 3
3. Taylor • PHI 2
Spiezio • STL 2
5. Bailey • LAD 2

Range Factor/9Inn as 3B

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Santo • CHC 3.62
2. Charles • NYM 3.37
3. Wills • PIT 3.20
4. Boyer • ATL 3.17
5. Allen • PHI 2.85

Range Factor/Game as 3B

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Santo • CHC 3.60
2. Charles • NYM 3.21
3. Wills • PIT 3.06
4. Boyer • ATL 3.05
5. Allen • PHI 2.84

Fielding % as 3B

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Boyer • ATL .970
2. Aspromonte • HOU .963
3. Pérez • CIN .963
4. Santo • CHC .957
5. Wills • PIT .948

Total Zone Runs as SS (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Lanier • SFG 16
2. Maxvill • STL 9
3. Alley • PIT 7
4. Kessinger • CHC 6
5. Davenport • SFG 5

Range Factor/9Inn as SS

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Harrelson • NYM 5.28
2. Alley • PIT 5.28
3. Wine • PHI 5.20
4. Lanier • SFG 5.20
5. Maxvill • STL 5.08

Range Factor/Game as SS

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Alley • PIT 5.18
2. Harrelson • NYM 4.84
3. Maxvill • STL 4.77
4. Kessinger • CHC 4.70
5. Cárdenas • CIN 4.69

Fielding % as SS

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Wine • PHI .980
2. Lanier • SFG .974
3. Maxvill • STL .974
4. Kessinger • CHC .973
5. Alley • PIT .967

Total Zone Runs as LF (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Davis • HOU 6
2. González • PHI 5
3. Brock • STL 4
4. Reynolds • NYM 2
5. Briggs • PHI 1
Pagán • PIT 1

Range Factor/9Inn as LF (s.1948)

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. González • PHI 2.02
2. Johnson • LAD 1.94
3. Carty • ATL 1.88
4. Brock • STL 1.84
5. Rose • CIN 1.84

Range Factor/Game as LF (s.1901)

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Brock • STL 1.83
2. Carty • ATL 1.82
3. González • PHI 1.77
4. Rose • CIN 1.77
5. Johnson • LAD 1.73

Fielding % as LF (s.1901)

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Williams • CHC .989
2. Rose • CIN .982
3. Davis • NYM .975
4. Brock • STL .957

Total Zone Runs as CF (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Phillips • CHC 10
2. Jones • ATL 5
3. Flood • STL 5
4. Hickman • LAD 3
5. Mays • SFG 2

Range Factor/9Inn as CF (s.1948)

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Flood • STL 2.63
2. Phillips • CHC 2.49
3. Jones • ATL 2.48
4. Wynn • HOU 2.39
5. Mays • SFG 2.35

Range Factor/Game as CF (s.1901)

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Flood • STL 2.53
2. Phillips • CHC 2.45
3. Wynn • HOU 2.33
4. Jones • ATL 2.32
5. Davis • LAD 2.24

Fielding % as CF (s.1901)

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Alou • PIT .989
2. Flood • STL .988
3. Pinson • CIN .986
4. Phillips • CHC .980
5. Mays • SFG .976

Total Zone Runs as RF (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Harper • CIN 13
2. Maris • STL 10
3. Aaron • ATL 4
4. Clemente • PIT 4
5. González • PHI 3

Range Factor/9Inn as RF (s.1948)

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Harper • CIN 2.37
2. Aaron • ATL 2.21
3. Maris • STL 2.18
4. Clemente • PIT 2.11
5. Callison • PHI 2.09

Range Factor/Game as RF (s.1901)

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Harper • CIN 2.22
2. Aaron • ATL 2.16
3. Clemente • PIT 2.03
4. Callison • PHI 2.02
5. Staub • HOU 1.94

Fielding % as RF (s.1901)

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Maris • STL .991
2. Brown • SFG .984
3. Aaron • ATL .978
4. Callison • PHI .977
5. Clemente • PIT .970

Total Zone Runs as OF (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Harper • CIN 12
2. Phillips • CHC 10
3. Maris • STL 9
4. González • PHI 8
5. Flood • STL 5

Range Factor/9Inn as OF

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Flood • STL 2.62
2. Phillips • CHC 2.55
3. Wynn • HOU 2.40
4. Mays • SFG 2.34
5. Harper • CIN 2.31

Range Factor/Game as OF

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Flood • STL 2.52
2. Phillips • CHC 2.50
3. Wynn • HOU 2.34
4. Davis • LAD 2.22
5. Pinson • CIN 2.20

Fielding % as OF

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. González • PHI .993
2. Maris • STL .991
3. Williams • CHC .989
4. Alou • PIT .989
5. Flood • STL .988

Range Factor/9Inn as P

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Jackson • PHI 2.92
2. Ribant • PIT 2.72
3. Washburn • STL 2.61
4. Perry • SFG 2.58
5. Sisk • PIT 2.43

Range Factor/Game as P

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Perry • SFG 2.15
2. Jackson • PHI 2.13
3. Washburn • STL 2.00
4. Drysdale • LAD 1.97
5. Jenkins • CHC 1.82

Fielding % as P

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Pappas • CIN 1.000
Wise • PHI 1.000
Short • PHI 1.000
Gibson • STL 1.000
Niekro • CHC 1.000
McCormick • SFG 1.000
Lemaster • ATL 1.000

A ** by the stat's value indicates the player had fewer than the required number of at bats or plate appearances for the BA, OBP, SLG or OPS title that year. In order to rank the player, the necessary number of hitless at bats were added to the player's season total. The value printed here is their actual value and not the value used to rank them, therefore some numbers may appear out of order.

For rate stats, generally a minimum of 3.1 Plate Appearances/Team Game (batting), 1.0 IP/Team Game (pitching), 0.67 Gm and Chances/Team Game (fielding), 0.2 SB att/Team Game (catchers), 0.1 SB att/Team Game (baserunners only since 1951), and 0.1 decision/Team Game (W-L%) is needed for single-season leaderboards. For pitcher fielding the minimums are reduced by a third. For LF, CF, RF fielding stats, we only have reliable data since 1898, so all leaders are since 1898. Explanation of min. requirements