National League Fielding Leaders

Putouts

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Clendenon • PIT 1,450
2. White • STL 1,389
3. Cepeda • SFG 1,262
4. Banks • CHC 1,178
5. Edwards • CIN 1,008

Assists

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Mazeroski • PIT 506
2. Hubbs • CHC 493
3. Rodgers • CHC 454
4. Groat • STL 448
5. Schofield • PIT 422

Errors Committed

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Rodgers • CHC 35
2. Boyer • STL 34
3. Bailey • PIT 33
4. Moran • NYM 27
5. Hunt • NYM 26
Lillis • HOU 26
Santo • CHC 26
Wills • LAD 26
Groat • STL 26

Total Zone Runs

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Mazeroski • PIT 23
2. Callison • PHI 18
3. Flood • STL 15
4. Mathews • MLN 14
5. Bertell • CHC 12

Def. Games as C

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Edwards • CIN 148
2. Dalrymple • PHI 142
3. Roseboro • LAD 134
4. McCarver • STL 126
5. Bateman • HOU 115

Putouts as C

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Edwards • CIN 1,008
2. Roseboro • LAD 908
3. Dalrymple • PHI 881
4. McCarver • STL 722
5. Bateman • HOU 690

Assists as C

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Dalrymple • PHI 90
2. Edwards • CIN 87
3. Bertell • CHC 84
4. Bateman • HOU 81
5. Roseboro • LAD 66

Errors Committed as C

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Bateman • HOU 23
2. Dalrymple • PHI 19
3. Coleman • NYM 15
4. Roseboro • LAD 8
Bailey • SFG 8
Bertell • CHC 8

Double Plays Turned as C

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Dalrymple • PHI 16
Edwards • CIN 16
3. Bertell • CHC 15
4. Torre • MLN 9
Coleman • NYM 9

Passed Balls

Passed Balls

1. McCarver • STL 16
Bateman • HOU 16
3. Roseboro • LAD 14
4. Gonder • 2TM 11
Torre • MLN 11
Coleman • NYM 11

Stolen Bases Allowed as C

Pre-1950 SB & CS data for catchers is estimated from catcher assists, games started and opposition stolen bases. From 1950 on SB, CS, Pickoff, & WP data for catchers and pitchers is taken from play-by-play accounts in the retrosheet files. There are several hundred games without pbp from 1950 to 1968 and for those we may not have any data.

1. Dalrymple • PHI 56
2. Bateman • HOU 54
3. Edwards • CIN 51
4. McCarver • STL 45
5. Bailey • SFG 40

Caught Stealing as C

Pre-1950 SB & CS data for catchers is estimated from catcher assists, games started and opposition stolen bases. From 1950 on SB, CS, Pickoff, & WP data for catchers and pitchers is taken from play-by-play accounts in the retrosheet files. There are several hundred games without pbp from 1950 to 1968 and for those we may not have any data.

1. Dalrymple • PHI 50
2. Bertell • CHC 45
3. Edwards • CIN 44
4. Bateman • HOU 37
5. Coleman • NYM 29

Caught Stealing %

Caught Stealing Percentage
CS / (SB + CS)

1. Bertell • CHC 60.8
2. Sherry • NYM 51.4
3. Coleman • NYM 50.0
4. Dalrymple • PHI 47.2
5. Haller • SFG 46.9

Def. Games as 1B

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. White • STL 162
2. Clendenon • PIT 151
3. Cepeda • SFG 150
4. Sievers • PHI 126
5. Banks • CHC 125

Putouts as 1B

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Clendenon • PIT 1,450
2. White • STL 1,389
3. Cepeda • SFG 1,262
4. Banks • CHC 1,178
5. Sievers • PHI 981

Assists as 1B

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Clendenon • PIT 118
2. Harkness • NYM 112
3. White • STL 105
4. Cepeda • SFG 83
5. Banks • CHC 78

Errors Committed as 1B

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Cepeda • SFG 21
2. Clendenon • PIT 15
3. Harkness • NYM 14
4. White • STL 13
5. Sievers • PHI 12

Double Plays Turned as 1B

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Clendenon • PIT 154
2. White • STL 126
3. Banks • CHC 97
4. Sievers • PHI 93
5. Cepeda • SFG 91

Def. Games as 2B

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Javier • STL 161
2. Rose • CIN 157
3. Hubbs • CHC 152
4. Taylor • PHI 149
5. Hunt • NYM 142

Putouts as 2B

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Javier • STL 377
2. Rose • CIN 360
3. Hunt • NYM 350
4. Mazeroski • PIT 340
5. Hubbs • CHC 338

Assists as 2B

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Mazeroski • PIT 506
2. Hubbs • CHC 493
3. Hunt • NYM 416
4. Javier • STL 415
5. Taylor • PHI 396

Errors Committed as 2B

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Hunt • NYM 26
2. Javier • STL 25
3. Rose • CIN 22
Hubbs • CHC 22
5. Hiller • SFG 19

Double Plays Turned as 2B

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Mazeroski • PIT 131
2. Bolling • MLN 107
3. Hubbs • CHC 96
4. Javier • STL 93
5. Taylor • PHI 86

Def. Games as 3B

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Santo • CHC 162
2. Boyer • STL 159
3. Bailey • PIT 153
4. Aspromonte • HOU 131
5. Davenport • SFG 127

Putouts as 3B

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Santo • CHC 136
2. Aspromonte • HOU 134
3. Boyer • STL 129
4. Davenport • SFG 122
5. Mathews • MLN 113
Bailey • PIT 113

Assists as 3B

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Santo • CHC 374
2. Bailey • PIT 332
3. Boyer • STL 293
4. Mathews • MLN 276
5. Aspromonte • HOU 213

Errors Committed as 3B

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Boyer • STL 34
2. Bailey • PIT 32
3. Santo • CHC 26
4. Aspromonte • HOU 23
5. Hickman • NYM 14

Double Plays Turned as 3B

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Bailey • PIT 38
2. Santo • CHC 25
3. Boyer • STL 23
Mathews • MLN 23
5. Hickman • NYM 14

Def. Games as SS

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Groat • STL 158
2. Cárdenas • CIN 157
3. Rodgers • CHC 150
4. Pagán • SFG 143
5. Wine • PHI 132

Putouts as SS

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Rodgers • CHC 271
2. Cárdenas • CIN 270
3. Pagán • SFG 262
4. Groat • STL 257
5. Schofield • PIT 232

Assists as SS

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Rodgers • CHC 454
2. Groat • STL 448
3. Cárdenas • CIN 420
4. Pagán • SFG 375
5. Schofield • PIT 366

Errors Committed as SS

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Rodgers • CHC 35
2. Moran • NYM 27
3. Groat • STL 26
4. Lillis • HOU 25
5. Wills • LAD 21
Schofield • PIT 21

Double Plays Turned as SS

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Rodgers • CHC 100
2. Schofield • PIT 95
3. Groat • STL 91
4. Cárdenas • CIN 84
5. Wine • PHI 73

Def. Games as LF (s.1901)

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Williams • CHC 160
2. McCovey • SFG 133
3. Davis • LAD 120
4. Robinson • CIN 110
5. Covington • PHI 101

Putouts as LF (s.1901)

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Williams • CHC 298
2. McCovey • SFG 218
3. Davis • LAD 166
4. Robinson • CIN 159
5. Thomas • NYM 156

Assists as LF (s.1901)

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Williams • CHC 13
2. Thomas • NYM 8
3. Davis • LAD 7
Robinson • CIN 7
5. McCovey • SFG 6

Errors Committed as LF (s.1901)

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. McCovey • SFG 13
2. Covington • PHI 8
3. Mathews • MLN 6
Davis • LAD 6
5. Wynn • HOU 4
Musial • STL 4
Williams • CHC 4

Double Plays Turned as LF (s.1901)

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Davis • LAD 3
2. Kuenn • SFG 2
Williams • CHC 2
4. Davis • HOU 1
González • PHI 1
Kanehl • NYM 1
Maye • MLN 1
Oliver • MLN 1
Savage • PIT 1
Spangler • HOU 1
Thomas • NYM 1
Warwick • HOU 1
Wynn • HOU 1
Skinner • 2TM 1

Def. Games as CF (s.1901)

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Flood • STL 158
2. Mays • SFG 157
3. Davis • LAD 153
4. Pinson • CIN 145
5. Virdon • PIT 142

Putouts as CF (s.1901)

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Flood • STL 403
2. Mays • SFG 398
3. Davis • LAD 336
4. Pinson • CIN 320
5. Virdon • PIT 315

Assists as CF (s.1901)

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Davis • LAD 15
2. Flood • STL 12
3. Pinson • CIN 8
Mays • SFG 8
5. Goss • HOU 7

Errors Committed as CF (s.1901)

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Pinson • CIN 8
Mays • SFG 8
Davis • LAD 8
4. Flood • STL 5
5. Burton • CHC 4
Virdon • PIT 4

Double Plays Turned as CF (s.1901)

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Cline • MLN 3
Davis • LAD 3
3. Flood • STL 2
Goss • HOU 2
Virdon • PIT 2

Def. Games as RF (s.1901)

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Aaron • MLN 161
2. Callison • PHI 156
3. Alou • SFG 143
Clemente • PIT 143
5. Brock • CHC 140

Putouts as RF (s.1901)

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Callison • PHI 299
2. Brock • CHC 266
Aaron • MLN 266
4. Alou • SFG 251
5. Clemente • PIT 224

Assists as RF (s.1901)

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Callison • PHI 25
2. Brock • CHC 17
3. Clemente • PIT 11
Aaron • MLN 11
5. Altman • STL 8

Errors Committed as RF (s.1901)

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Clemente • PIT 10
2. Howard • LAD 8
Brock • CHC 8
4. Aaron • MLN 5
Moon • LAD 5

Double Plays Turned as RF (s.1901)

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Brock • CHC 7
2. Callison • PHI 4
3. Alou • SFG 2
Clemente • PIT 2
5. Aaron • MLN 1
Altman • STL 1
Christopher • NYM 1
Harper • CIN 1
Hickman • NYM 1
James • STL 1
Kolb • STL 1
Kranepool • NYM 1
Robinson • CIN 1
Warwick • HOU 1

Def. Games as OF

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Pinson • CIN 162
2. Aaron • MLN 161
3. Williams • CHC 160
4. Flood • STL 158
5. Mays • SFG 157
Callison • PHI 157

Putouts as OF

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Flood • STL 401
2. Mays • SFG 397
3. Pinson • CIN 357
4. Davis • LAD 337
5. Virdon • PIT 323

Assists as OF

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Callison • PHI 26
2. Brock • CHC 17
3. Davis • LAD 16
4. Williams • CHC 13
Robinson • CIN 13

Errors Committed as OF

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. McCovey • SFG 14
2. Clemente • PIT 11
3. Pinson • CIN 8
Davis • LAD 8
Mays • SFG 8
Brock • CHC 8
Covington • PHI 8
Howard • LAD 8

Double Plays Turned as OF

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Brock • CHC 7
2. Callison • PHI 4
3. Cline • MLN 3
Davis • LAD 3
Davis • LAD 3

Def. Games as P

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Perranoski • LAD 69
2. Baldschun • PHI 65
3. Bearnarth • NYM 58
4. McDaniel • CHC 57
Sisk • PIT 57

Putouts as P

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Broglio • STL 30
2. Gibson • STL 27
3. Friend • PIT 23
4. Jackson • CHC 21
5. Willey • NYM 20

Assists as P

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Spahn • MLN 71
2. Sanford • SFG 65
3. Drysdale • LAD 62
4. Craig • NYM 60
Ellsworth • CHC 60

Errors Committed as P

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Craig • NYM 8
2. McBean • PIT 6
3. Baldschun • PHI 5
O'Toole • CIN 5
Burdette • 2TM 5
Nuxhall • CIN 5
Gibson • STL 5
Cardwell • PIT 5

Double Plays Turned as P

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Spahn • MLN 8
2. McLish • PHI 7
Drysdale • LAD 7
4. Jackson • NYM 5
Miller • LAD 5
Buhl • CHC 5

Total Zone Runs as C (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Bertell • CHC 12
2. Dalrymple • PHI 6
3. Pagliaroni • PIT 4
4. Edwards • CIN 3
Haller • SFG 3
Schaffer • CHC 3
Sherry • NYM 3

Range Factor/9Inn as C

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Edwards • CIN 7.94
2. Roseboro • LAD 7.66
3. Dalrymple • PHI 7.50
4. Bateman • HOU 7.20
5. Bailey • SFG 7.16

Range Factor/Game as C

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Edwards • CIN 7.40
2. Roseboro • LAD 7.27
3. Bailey • SFG 6.86
4. Dalrymple • PHI 6.84
5. Bateman • HOU 6.70

Fielding % as C

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Edwards • CIN .995
2. Haller • SFG .994
3. Torre • MLN .994
4. McCarver • STL .994
5. Roseboro • LAD .992

Total Zone Runs as 1B (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Harkness • NYM 7
2. White • STL 5
3. Torre • MLN 4
4. Staub • HOU 4
5. Torre • PHI 3

Range Factor/9Inn as 1B

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Banks • CHC 10.72
2. Clendenon • PIT 10.66
3. Harkness • NYM 10.29
4. Staub • HOU 9.68
5. Sievers • PHI 9.48

Range Factor/Game as 1B

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Clendenon • PIT 10.38
2. Banks • CHC 10.05
3. Harkness • NYM 9.53
4. White • STL 9.22
5. Cepeda • SFG 8.97

Fielding % as 1B

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Fairly • LAD .995
2. Banks • CHC .993
3. White • STL .991
4. Clendenon • PIT .991
5. Staub • HOU .989

Total Zone Runs as 2B (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Mazeroski • PIT 23
2. Hubbs • CHC 8
3. Taylor • PHI 6
4. Rojas • PHI 4
5. Bolling • MLN 2

Range Factor/9Inn as 2B

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Mazeroski • PIT 6.20
2. Hunt • NYM 5.71
3. Hubbs • CHC 5.64
4. Bolling • MLN 5.13
5. Javier • STL 5.08

Range Factor/Game as 2B

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Mazeroski • PIT 6.13
2. Hubbs • CHC 5.47
3. Hunt • NYM 5.39
4. Bolling • MLN 5.00
5. Javier • STL 4.92

Fielding % as 2B

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Taylor • PHI .986
2. Gilliam • LAD .985
3. Mazeroski • PIT .984
4. Bolling • MLN .981
5. Hubbs • CHC .974

Total Zone Runs as 3B (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Mathews • MLN 15
2. Santo • CHC 10
3. Hoak • PHI 6
4. Bailey • PIT 5
5. Amaro • PHI 4

Range Factor/9Inn as 3B

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Mathews • MLN 3.34
2. Santo • CHC 3.15
3. Hoak • PHI 3.09
4. Neal • 2TM 3.04
5. Bailey • PIT 2.96

Range Factor/Game as 3B

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Mathews • MLN 3.21
2. Santo • CHC 3.15
3. Bailey • PIT 2.91
4. Hoak • PHI 2.76
5. Neal • 2TM 2.75

Fielding % as 3B

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Mathews • MLN .968
2. Davenport • SFG .962
3. Santo • CHC .951
4. Aspromonte • HOU .938
5. Bailey • PIT .933

Total Zone Runs as SS (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Menke • MLN 11
2. Wine • PHI 9
3. Cárdenas • CIN 9
4. Groat • STL 8
5. McMillan • MLN 8

Range Factor/9Inn as SS

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Schofield • PIT 5.27
2. Menke • MLN 5.09
3. Moran • NYM 4.96
4. Wills • LAD 4.96
5. Wine • PHI 4.94

Range Factor/Game as SS

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Schofield • PIT 5.11
2. Rodgers • CHC 4.83
3. McMillan • MLN 4.53
4. Wills • LAD 4.52
5. Menke • MLN 4.51

Fielding % as SS

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Cárdenas • CIN .972
2. Wine • PHI .971
3. Pagán • SFG .970
4. Schofield • PIT .966
5. Groat • STL .964

Total Zone Runs as LF (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Williams • CHC 11
2. Maye • MLN 4
3. González • PHI 4
4. James • STL 4
5. Spangler • HOU 3

Range Factor/9Inn as LF (s.1948)

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Spangler • HOU 2.08
2. James • STL 1.98
3. Williams • CHC 1.95
4. Thomas • NYM 1.88
5. McCovey • SFG 1.84

Range Factor/Game as LF (s.1901)

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Williams • CHC 1.94
2. Spangler • HOU 1.83
3. Thomas • NYM 1.71
4. McCovey • SFG 1.68
5. Skinner • 2TM 1.66

Fielding % as LF (s.1901)

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Williams • CHC .987
2. Robinson • CIN .982
3. Davis • LAD .966
4. McCovey • SFG .945

Total Zone Runs as CF (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Flood • STL 15
2. Mays • SFG 12
3. Cline • MLN 10
4. Davis • LAD 9
5. Jones • MLN 4

Range Factor/9Inn as CF (s.1948)

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Flood • STL 2.64
2. Mays • SFG 2.63
3. Davis • LAD 2.53
4. Goss • HOU 2.49
5. Pinson • CIN 2.35

Range Factor/Game as CF (s.1901)

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Flood • STL 2.63
2. Mays • SFG 2.59
3. Davis • LAD 2.29
4. Pinson • CIN 2.26
5. Virdon • PIT 2.26

Fielding % as CF (s.1901)

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Goss • HOU .993
2. Flood • STL .988
3. Virdon • PIT .988
4. Mays • SFG .981
5. Davis • LAD .978

Total Zone Runs as RF (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Callison • PHI 18
2. Brock • CHC 9
3. Alou • SFG 6
4. Robinson • CIN 4
5. James • STL 3

Range Factor/9Inn as RF (s.1948)

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Brock • CHC 2.12
2. Callison • PHI 2.11
3. Harper • CIN 2.09
4. Alou • SFG 1.96
5. Altman • STL 1.93

Range Factor/Game as RF (s.1901)

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Callison • PHI 2.08
2. Brock • CHC 2.02
3. Harper • CIN 1.93
4. Alou • SFG 1.80
5. Altman • STL 1.78

Fielding % as RF (s.1901)

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Callison • PHI .994
2. Alou • SFG .985
3. Warwick • HOU .983
4. Aaron • MLN .982
5. Altman • STL .981

Total Zone Runs as OF (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Callison • PHI 18
2. Flood • STL 15
3. Mays • SFG 12
4. Williams • CHC 11
5. Cline • MLN 10

Range Factor/9Inn as OF

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Flood • STL 2.63
2. Mays • SFG 2.62
3. Goss • HOU 2.59
4. Davis • LAD 2.55
5. Virdon • PIT 2.36

Range Factor/Game as OF

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Flood • STL 2.61
2. Mays • SFG 2.57
3. Virdon • PIT 2.32
4. Davis • LAD 2.31
5. Goss • HOU 2.30

Fielding % as OF

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Demeter • PHI 1.000
2. Callison • PHI .994
3. Goss • HOU .993
4. Flood • STL .988
5. Warwick • HOU .988

Range Factor/9Inn as P

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Miller • LAD 3.32
2. Craig • NYM 2.97
3. Spahn • MLN 2.84
4. Short • PHI 2.77
5. Schwall • PIT 2.68

Range Factor/Game as P

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Spahn • MLN 2.48
2. Jackson • CHC 2.14
3. Ellsworth • CHC 2.03
4. Sanford • SFG 1.93
Drysdale • LAD 1.93

Fielding % as P

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Podres • LAD 1.000
Buhl • CHC 1.000
Culp • PHI 1.000
Short • PHI 1.000
Simmons • STL 1.000
Farrell • HOU 1.000
Hendley • MLN 1.000

A ** by the stat's value indicates the player had fewer than the required number of at bats or plate appearances for the BA, OBP, SLG or OPS title that year. In order to rank the player, the necessary number of hitless at bats were added to the player's season total. The value printed here is their actual value and not the value used to rank them, therefore some numbers may appear out of order.

For rate stats, generally a minimum of 3.1 Plate Appearances/Team Game (batting), 1.0 IP/Team Game (pitching), 0.67 Gm and Chances/Team Game (fielding), 0.2 SB att/Team Game (catchers), 0.1 SB att/Team Game (baserunners only since 1951), and 0.1 decision/Team Game (W-L%) is needed for single-season leaderboards. For pitcher fielding the minimums are reduced by a third. For LF, CF, RF fielding stats, we only have reliable data since 1898, so all leaders are since 1898. Explanation of min. requirements