National League Batting Leaders

Wins Above Replacement--all

<strong>Wins Above Replacement</strong><br>A single number that presents the number of wins the player added<br>to the team above what a replacement player (think AAA or AAAA) would add.<br>Scale for a single-season: 8+ MVP Quality, 5+ All-Star Quality, 2+ Starter,<br>0-2 Reserve, < 0 Replacement Level <br>Developed by Sean Smith of BaseballProjection.com

1. HornsbySTL 10.1
2. DonohueCIN 7.0
3. CuylerPIT 6.8
4. LuqueCIN 6.8
5. RixeyCIN 6.3
6. ScottNYG 6.0
7. VanceBRO 5.8
8. SherdelSTL 5.7
9. BottomleySTL 5.5
FournierBRO 5.5

WAR Position Players

<strong>Wins Above Replacement for position players</strong><br>A single number that presents the number of wins the player added<br>to the team above what a replacement player (think AAA or AAAA) would add.<br>Scale: 8+ MVP Quality, 5+ All-Star Quality, 2+ Starter,<br>0-2 Reserve, < 0 Replacement Level <br> Developed by Sean Smith of BaseballProjection.com

1. HornsbySTL 10.1
2. CuylerPIT 6.8
3. BottomleySTL 5.5
FournierBRO 5.5
5. BancroftBSN 5.2
6. WheatBRO 5.0
7. BladesSTL 4.5
8. CareyPIT 4.4
9. WrightPIT 4.3
10. FrischNYG 4.2

Offensive WAR

<strong>Offensive Wins Above Replacement (everything but Fielding)</strong><br>The same statistic as Wins Above Replacement for Position<br>Players (WAR), but with the fielding value excluded.<br>oWAR + dWAR does not equal WAR.<br>Adding would count positions twice.<br>Contains the factor for batting stats, baserunning, a positional adjustment, and the replacement player adjustment.<br> Factors developed by Sean Smith of BaseballProjection.com

1. HornsbySTL 10.2
2. CuylerPIT 6.5
3. FournierBRO 6.2
4. BottomleySTL 5.6
5. WheatBRO 5.2
6. CareyPIT 4.5
7. BancroftBSN 4.4
8. BladesSTL 3.8
9. FrischNYG 3.7
10. BurrusBSN 3.6

Defensive WAR

<strong>Defensive Wins Above Replacement for position players</strong><br>A defensive measure of wins above replacement, but given<br>only the defensive stats of the player and his position adjustment. For this calculation, we use a<br>replacement level on defense is the league average.<br>Based on Baseball Info Solutions defensive runs saved from 2003 on<br>and total zone rating developed by Sean Smith of BaseballProjection.com previously

1. CritzCIN 2.5
2. AdamsCHC 2.3
WrightPIT 2.3
4. CaveneyCIN 1.7
5. BancroftBSN 1.6
6. PinelliCIN 1.6
7. HartnettCHC 1.2
8. FrischNYG 1.1
9. González2TM 0.9
10. MaranvilleCHC 0.9

Batting Average

<strong>Hits/At Bats</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 3.1 PA<br>per team game played<br>Bold indicates either highest BA using current stats<br>or awarded title at end of year.

1. HornsbySTL .403
2. BottomleySTL .367
3. WheatBRO .359
4. CuylerPIT .357
5. FournierBRO .350
6. HarperPHI .349
7. CareyPIT .343
8. BladesSTL .342
9. BurrusBSN .340
10. RoushCIN .339

On-Base%

<strong>(H + BB + HBP)/(At Bats + BB + HBP + SF)</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 3.1 PA<br>per team game played

1. HornsbySTL .489
2. FournierBRO .446
3. WilliamsPHI .435
4. BladesSTL .423
5. CuylerPIT .423
6. CareyPIT .418
7. BottomleySTL .413
8. GranthamPIT .413
9. WheatBRO .403
10. BancroftBSN .400

Slugging %

Total Bases/At Bats or
(1B + 2*2B + 3*3B + 4*HR)/AB

For recent years, leaders need 3.1 PA
per team game played

1. HornsbySTL .756
2. CuylerPIT .598
3. BottomleySTL .578
4. FournierBRO .569
5. HarperPHI .558
6. HartnettCHC .555
7. MeuselNYG .548
8. WheatBRO .541
9. BladesSTL .535
10. WilliamsPHI .522

On-Base Plus Slugging

<strong>On-Base + Slugging Percentages </strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 3.1 PA<br>per team game played

1. HornsbySTL 1.245
2. CuylerPIT 1.021
3. FournierBRO 1.015
4. BottomleySTL .992
5. BladesSTL .958
6. WilliamsPHI .958
7. HarperPHI .949
8. WheatBRO .944
9. MeuselNYG .912
10. CareyPIT .909

Games Played

Games Played or Pitched

1. BrownBRO 153
CuylerPIT 153
WrightPIT 153
BellSTL 153
BottomleySTL 153
6. BurrusBSN 152
7. WheatBRO 150
TraynorPIT 150
9. AdamsCHC 149
10. SandPHI 148

At Bats

At Bats

1. AdamsCHC 627
2. BottomleySTL 619
3. BrownBRO 618
4. CuylerPIT 617
5. WheatBRO 616
6. StockBRO 615
7. WrightPIT 614
8. TraynorPIT 591
9. BurrusBSN 588
10. KellyNYG 586
BellSTL 586

Plate Appearances

<strong>Plate Appearances</strong><br>When available, we use actual plate appearances from play-by-play game accounts<br>Otherwise estimated using AB + BB + HBP + SF + SH,<br>which excludes catcher interferences.<br>When <span class=tooltip>this color</span> click for a summary of each PA.

1. CuylerPIT 701
2. AdamsCHC 687
3. BottomleySTL 682
4. WheatBRO 671
5. BrownBRO 666
6. StockBRO 662
7. WrightPIT 660
8. TraynorPIT 658
9. BurrusBSN 652
10. FournierBRO 649

Runs Scored

Runs Scored/Allowed

1. CuylerPIT 144
2. HornsbySTL 133
3. WheatBRO 125
4. TraynorPIT 114
5. BladesSTL 112
6. CareyPIT 109
7. MoorePIT 106
8. FournierBRO 99
9. StockBRO 98
10. WrightPIT 97

Hits

Hits/Hits Allowed

1. BottomleySTL 227
2. WheatBRO 221
3. CuylerPIT 220
4. HornsbySTL 203
5. StockBRO 202
6. BurrusBSN 200
7. FournierBRO 191
8. BrownBRO 189
TraynorPIT 189
WrightPIT 189

Total Bases

<strong>Total Bases</strong><br>Singles + 2 x Doubles + 3 x Triples + 4 x Home Runs.

1. HornsbySTL 381
2. CuylerPIT 369
3. BottomleySTL 358
4. WheatBRO 333
5. FournierBRO 310
6. WrightPIT 295
7. MeuselNYG 283
8. KellyNYG 276
HarperPHI 276
10. TraynorPIT 274

Doubles

Doubles Hit/Allowed

1. BottomleySTL 44
2. CuylerPIT 43
3. WheatBRO 42
4. BurrusBSN 41
HornsbySTL 41
6. BrownBRO 39
CareyPIT 39
TraynorPIT 39
9. BladesSTL 37
10. MeuselNYG 35
HarperPHI 35

Triples

Triples Hit/Allowed

1. CuylerPIT 26
2. FournierBRO 16
RoushCIN 16
WalkerCIN 16
5. WheatBRO 14
TraynorPIT 14
7. CareyPIT 13
8. LindstromNYG 12
BottomleySTL 12
10. BrownBRO 11
BarnhartPIT 11

Home Runs

Home Runs Hit/Allowed

1. HornsbySTL 39
2. HartnettCHC 24
3. FournierBRO 22
4. MeuselNYG 21
BottomleySTL 21
6. KellyNYG 20
7. HarperPHI 18
CuylerPIT 18
WrightPIT 18
10. WheatBRO 14
BrooksCHC 14
WrightstonePHI 14

Runs Batted In

Runs Batted In

1. HornsbySTL 143
2. FournierBRO 130
3. BottomleySTL 128
4. WrightPIT 121
5. BarnhartPIT 114
6. MeuselNYG 111
7. TraynorPIT 106
8. WheatBRO 103
9. CuylerPIT 102
10. BrownBRO 99
KellyNYG 99

Bases on Balls

Bases on Balls/Walks

1. FournierBRO 86
2. HornsbySTL 83
3. MoorePIT 73
4. YoungsNYG 66
CareyPIT 66
6. BancroftBSN 64
SandPHI 64
8. BarnhartPIT 59
BladesSTL 59
10. CuylerPIT 58

Strikeouts

Strikeouts

1. HartnettCHC 77
2. SandPHI 65
3. Friberg2TM 57
4. CuylerPIT 56
5. KellyNYG 54
6. TerryNYG 52
7. YoungsNYG 51
8. SnyderNYG 49
9. BellSTL 47
BladesSTL 47

Stolen Bases

Stolen Bases

1. CareyPIT 46
2. CuylerPIT 41
3. AdamsCHC 26
4. RoushCIN 22
5. FrischNYG 21
6. SmithSTL 20
7. MoorePIT 19
8. YoungsNYG 17
9. HeathcoteCHC 15
TraynorPIT 15

Singles

Singles Hit/Allowed

1. StockBRO 164
2. WheatBRO 151
3. BurrusBSN 150
BottomleySTL 150
5. AdamsCHC 141
6. BrownBRO 134
7. CuylerPIT 133
8. FournierBRO 132
9. RoushCIN 131
10. TraynorPIT 130

Adjusted OPS+

<strong>OPS+</strong><br>100*[OBP/lg OBP + SLG/lg SLG - 1]<br>Adjusted to the player&#x2019;s ballpark(s)

1. HornsbySTL 210
2. FournierBRO 160
3. CuylerPIT 152
4. BottomleySTL 148
5. WheatBRO 142
6. BladesSTL 141
7. WilliamsPHI 136
8. MeuselNYG 133
9. HarperPHI 132
10. CareyPIT 126

Runs Created

<strong>Runs Created</strong><br>A set of formulas developed by Bill James and others<br>that estimates a player&#x2019;s total contributions<br>to a team&#x2019;s runs total.<br>This is computed with the "technical" formula when possible.<br>If SB or CS data is missing, the "basic" formula is used.<br>If HBP, IBB, SH, SF, or GIDP data is missing, the "stolen base" version of the formula is used. <br>Team Runs Created is the sum of player Runs Created.

1. HornsbySTL 185
2. CuylerPIT 154
3. BottomleySTL 146
4. FournierBRO 134
WheatBRO 134
6. CareyPIT 115
7. HarperPHI 104
8. BurrusBSN 102
TraynorPIT 102
10. MeuselNYG 101

Adj. Batting Runs

<strong>Adjusted Batting Runs</strong><br>A set of formulas developed by Gary Gillette, Pete Palmer and others<br>that estimates a player&#x2019;s total contributions<br>to a team&#x2019;s runs total via linear weights.<br>0.0 is an avg performance, <0 is worse than avg and >0 is better than avg

1. HornsbySTL 88
2. FournierBRO 53
3. CuylerPIT 48
4. BottomleySTL 44
5. WheatBRO 38
6. BladesSTL 31
7. BurrusBSN 25
8. CareyPIT 24
9. MeuselNYG 24
10. HarperPHI 23

Adj. Batting Wins

<strong>Adjusted Batting Wins</strong><br>A set of formulas developed by Gary Gillette, Pete Palmer and others<br>that estimates a player&#x2019;s total contributions<br>to a team&#x2019;s wins with his bat.<br>0.0 is an avg performance, <0 is worse than avg and >0 is better than avg

1. HornsbySTL 7.9
2. FournierBRO 4.9
3. CuylerPIT 4.4
4. BottomleySTL 4.1
5. WheatBRO 3.5
6. BladesSTL 2.9
7. BurrusBSN 2.3
8. CareyPIT 2.2
9. MeuselNYG 2.2
10. HarperPHI 2.1

Extra Base Hits

<strong>Extra Base Hits</strong><br>Doubles + Triples + Home Runs

1. HornsbySTL 90
2. CuylerPIT 87
3. BottomleySTL 77
4. WheatBRO 70
5. MeuselNYG 64
6. HarperPHI 60
WrightPIT 60
8. FournierBRO 59
TraynorPIT 59
10. CareyPIT 57
BladesSTL 57

Times On Base

<strong>Times on Base</strong><br>Hits + Bases on Balls + Hit By Pitch<br>Does not include Reached on Error or Catcher Interference.

1. CuylerPIT 291
2. HornsbySTL 288
3. FournierBRO 285
4. BottomleySTL 276
5. WheatBRO 267
6. CareyPIT 256
7. BurrusBSN 254
8. TraynorPIT 243
9. StockBRO 240
10. MoorePIT 238

Offensive Win %

<strong>Offensive Winning Percentage</strong><br>The percentage of games a team with nine of this player<br>batting would win. Assumes average pitching and defense.<br>This uses the Pythagorean win pct formula with the player's RC/G for runs scored and the league's R/9 as runs allowed.

1. HornsbySTL .883
2. CuylerPIT .765
3. FournierBRO .763
4. BottomleySTL .758
5. WheatBRO .733
6. BladesSTL .714
7. CareyPIT .703
8. HarperPHI .699
9. WilliamsPHI .697
10. GranthamPIT .679

Hit By Pitch

Times Hit by a Pitch.

1. CuylerPIT 13
2. FournierBRO 8
HenlinePHI 8
WelshBSN 8
5. HeathcoteCHC 7
AdamsCHC 7
7. ZitzmannCIN 6
HarperPHI 6
BladesSTL 6
10. WilliamsPHI 5
FelixBSN 5

Sacrifice Hits

Sacrifice Hits (Sacrifice Bunts)

1. PinelliCIN 34
2. BrownBRO 24
3. CritzCIN 21
4. BarnhartPIT 19
MoorePIT 19
6. BancroftBSN 17
7. HornsbySTL 16
Freigau2TM 16
9. CaveneyCIN 15
FonsecaPHI 15
WrightPIT 15
Holke2TM 15

Intentional Bases on Balls

<strong>Intentional Bases on Balls</strong><br>First tracked in 1955.

1. SnyderNYG 9
TaylorBRO 9
3. HornsbySTL 8
SmithPIT 8
5. HartleyNYG 6
BottomleySTL 6
HargraveCIN 6
GoochPIT 6
9. FournierBRO 4
TerryNYG 4
WrightPIT 4
HartnettCHC 4

Caught Stealing

Caught Stealing

1. RoushCIN 20
2. PinelliCIN 19
3. CritzCIN 13
SouthworthNYG 13
CuylerPIT 13
6. AdamsCHC 12
FrischNYG 12
8. HeathcoteCHC 11
WalkerCIN 11
ZitzmannCIN 11
YoungsNYG 11
CareyPIT 11

Power-Speed #

<strong>Power/Speed Number</strong><br>2 x (Home Runs x Stolen Bases)/(Stolen Bases + Home Runs)<br>The harmonic mean of HR and SB.<br>To do well you need a lot of both.<br>Developed by Bill James.

1. CuylerPIT 25.0
2. FrischNYG 14.4
3. HarperPHI 12.9
4. RoushCIN 11.7
5. BrooksCHC 11.7
6. GranthamPIT 10.2
7. MoorePIT 9.1
8. CareyPIT 9.0
9. Freigau2TM 8.9
10. YoungsNYG 8.9

AB per SO

<strong>At Bats Per Strikeout</strong><br>For career marks this only includes AB&#x2019;s for seasons where SO&#x2019;s were tracked.

1. High2TM 47.7
2. SouthworthNYG 43.0
3. AdamsCHC 41.8
4. RoushCIN 38.6
5. FrischNYG 35.9
6. BrownBRO 34.3
7. CritzCIN 31.8
8. TraynorPIT 31.1
9. JohnstonBRO 28.7
10. CareyPIT 28.5

AB per HR

<strong>At Bats Per Home Run</strong>

1. HornsbySTL 12.9
2. HartnettCHC 16.6
3. WilliamsPHI 24.2
4. MeuselNYG 24.6
5. FournierBRO 24.8
6. HarperPHI 27.5
7. KellyNYG 29.3
8. BottomleySTL 29.5
9. SnyderNYG 29.5
10. WrightPIT 34.1

Outs Made

<strong>Outs Made</strong><br>(At Bats - Hits) + Double Plays Grounded Into <br>+ Sac. Flies + Sac. Hits + Caught Stealing.

1. AdamsCHC 468
2. BrownBRO 457
3. WrightPIT 447
4. BellSTL 434
5. CritzCIN 425
6. TraynorPIT 424
7. StockBRO 423
8. CuylerPIT 422
9. KellyNYG 417
10. MoorePIT 410

Base-Out Runs Added (RE24)

<strong>Base-Out Runs Added</strong><br>Given the bases occupied/out situation, how many runs did the batter<br> or baserunner add in the resulting play.<br>Compared to average, so 0 is average, and above 0 is better than average

1. HornsbySTL 89.94
2. FournierBRO 77.48
3. CuylerPIT 58.73
4. WheatBRO 45.19
5. BladesSTL 36.27
6. BottomleySTL 34.98
7. HarperPHI 32.95
8. GranthamPIT 32.18
9. RoushCIN 30.36
10. MeuselNYG 29.02

Win Probability Added (WPA)

<strong>Win Probability Added for Offensive Player</strong><br>Given average teams, this is the change in probability<br>caused by this batter during the game.<br>A change of +/- 1 would indicate one win added or lost.

1. FournierBRO 6.9
2. HornsbySTL 6.3
3. CuylerPIT 5.0
4. MeuselNYG 4.6
5. BottomleySTL 4.5
6. WheatBRO 3.3
7. RoushCIN 2.8
8. StockBRO 2.6
9. HarperPHI 2.5
10. BladesSTL 2.4

Situ. Wins Added (WPA/LI)

<strong>Situational Wins (WPA/LI)</strong><br>It is the sum of WPA divided by the leverage index for each play.<br>WPA depends greatly on the context of the at bats.<br>This stat does not.

1. HornsbySTL 6.9
2. FournierBRO 5.8
3. CuylerPIT 4.5
4. BladesSTL 3.5
5. WheatBRO 3.1
6. BottomleySTL 3.0
7. MeuselNYG 2.7
8. GranthamPIT 2.3
9. RoushCIN 2.2
10. CareyPIT 2.1

Championship WPA (cWPA)

<strong>Championship Win Probability Added for Offensive Player</strong><br>Given average teams, this is the change in probability, displayed in percentage points.<br>A change of +/- 100% would indicate one world series win added or lost.

1. CuylerPIT 11.6
2. MeuselNYG 10.2
3. FournierBRO 7.2
4. KellyNYG 7.1
5. WrightPIT 6.6
6. TerryNYG 5.3
7. StockBRO 4.3
8. WheatBRO 4.3
9. RoushCIN 3.8
10. BarnhartPIT 3.6

Base-Out Wins Added (REW)

<strong>Base-Out Wins Added (REW)</strong><br>This is the number of wins above average the player was worth by their performance measured by the 24 <br>base-out situations across every play in the game.

1. HornsbySTL 8.1
2. FournierBRO 7.2
3. CuylerPIT 5.2
4. WheatBRO 4.2
5. BladesSTL 3.3
6. BottomleySTL 3.2
7. HarperPHI 2.9
8. GranthamPIT 2.9
9. RoushCIN 2.8
10. MeuselNYG 2.7

rOBA

rOBA
A measure of a player's offensive contributions, weighted in proportion to each event's actual run value

1. HornsbySTL .534
2. CuylerPIT .457
3. FournierBRO .449
4. BottomleySTL .438
5. CareyPIT .426
6. WheatBRO .424
7. BladesSTL .423
8. WilliamsPHI .422
9. HarperPHI .420
10. GranthamPIT .412

Rbat+

Rbat+
Batting runs as computed for WAR, but indexed to the environment the player played in, where 100 is league average.

1. HornsbySTL 224
2. FournierBRO 173
3. CuylerPIT 162
4. BottomleySTL 159
5. WheatBRO 153
6. BladesSTL 151
7. WilliamsPHI 148
8. HarperPHI 142
9. MeuselNYG 142
10. CareyPIT 138