Rankings of Negro League players should consider that Negro League data is not complete. Research is still ongoing and we’ll continue to publish updates as more information becomes available. Negro Leagues Data: Frequently Asked Questions

Negro American League Pitching Leaders

Wins Above Replacement--all

<strong>Wins Above Replacement</strong><br>A single number that presents the number of wins the player added<br>to the team above what a replacement player (think AAA or AAAA) would add.<br>Scale for a single-season: 8+ MVP Quality, 5+ All-Star Quality, 2+ Starter,<br>0-2 Reserve, < 0 Replacement Level <br>Developed by Sean Smith of BaseballProjection.com

1. Smith3TM 6.3
2. HoustonCT 3.8
3. BrownKCM 3.2
4. CorneliusCAG 3.1
5. Allen3TM 3.0
6. BarnesKCM 2.9
7. BremerCT 2.6
8. MitchellBBB 2.2
9. FosterCAG 1.8
10. EasterlingCT 1.7

WAR for Pitchers

<strong>Wins Above Replacement for Pitchers</strong><br>A single number that presents the number of wins the player added<br>to the team above what a replacement player (think AAA or AAAA) would add. This value includes defensive support and includes additional value for high leverage situations.<br>Scale: 8+ MVP Quality, 5+ All-Star Quality, 2+ Starter,<br>0-2 Reserve, < 0 Replacement Level <br> Developed by Sean Smith of BaseballProjection.com

1. Smith2TM 5.8
2. HoustonCT 3.6
3. CorneliusCAG 3.3
4. BarnesKCM 2.6
5. BremerCT 2.4
6. MitchellBBB 2.0
7. TrentCAG 1.9
8. Cooper2TM 1.6
9. FosterCAG 1.6
10. McHenryKCM 1.5

Earned Run Average

<strong>9 * ER / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played.<br>Bold indicates lowest ERA using current stats<br><span class=glimmer>Gold</span> means awarded ERA title at end of year.

1. BremerCT 1.58
2. Smith2TM 1.60
3. BarnesKCM 2.08
4. McHenryKCM 2.27
5. HoustonCT 2.43
6. Cooper2TM 2.65
7. Wilson2TM 2.70
8. TrentCAG 2.76
9. CorneliusCAG 2.86
10. Moss3TM 2.97

Wins

Wins

1. Smith2TM 12
2. HoustonCT 11
3. BarnesKCM 9
4. MarkhamKCM 7
5. CorneliusCAG 6
6. BremerCT 5
TrentCAG 5
8. Moss3TM 4
Kranson3TM 4
FosterCAG 4

Win-Loss %

<strong>Win-Loss Percentage</strong><br>W / (W + L)<br>For players, leaders need one decision for every ten team games.<br>For managers, minimum to qualify for leading is 320 games.

1. MarkhamKCM 1.000
2. BarnesKCM .818
3. HoustonCT .786
4. MitchellBBB .750
Smith2TM .750
6. BremerCT .714
7. CorneliusCAG .600
CookIA .600
Wilson2TM .600
HowardBBB .600
Cooper2TM .600

Walks & Hits per IP

<strong>(BB + H)/IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. Smith2TM 0.850
2. BremerCT 0.912
3. Cooper2TM 0.919
4. CorneliusCAG 1.100
5. HoustonCT 1.103
6. BarnesKCM 1.125
Moss3TM 1.125
8. McHenryKCM 1.144
9. Wilson2TM 1.163
10. TrentCAG 1.253

Hits per 9 IP

<strong>9 x H / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. Smith2TM 5.852
2. BremerCT 6.474
3. Cooper2TM 6.711
4. CorneliusCAG 7.036
5. McHenryKCM 7.752
6. BarnesKCM 7.788
7. Hayslett2TM 8.308
8. HoustonCT 8.329
9. Wilson2TM 8.438
10. FosterCAG 8.591

Bases On Balls per 9 IP

<strong>9 x BB / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. Moss3TM 1.330
2. Cooper2TM 1.561
3. HoustonCT 1.596
4. BremerCT 1.737
5. Smith2TM 1.796
6. TrentCAG 1.800
7. JeffersonCT 1.831
8. Wilson2TM 2.025
9. BrutonBBB 2.225
10. WebsterDTS 2.234

Strikeouts per 9 IP

<strong>9 x SO / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. MarkhamKCM 8.874
2. JeffersonCT 7.551
3. Smith2TM 7.049
4. HoustonCT 6.802
5. Moss3TM 6.341
6. ThomasDTS 6.300
7. Wilson2TM 6.244
8. Cooper2TM 6.243
9. HannibalIA 6.128
10. HowardBBB 6.027

Games Played

Games Played or Pitched

1. Smith2TM 22
2. CorneliusCAG 18
HoustonCT 18
4. FosterCAG 16
TrentCAG 16
Moss3TM 16
7. McHenryKCM 15
Kranson3TM 15
BarnesKCM 15
10. JohnsonSL2 14

Saves

Saves

1. McHenryKCM 3
TrentCAG 3
3. BarnesKCM 2
Howard2TM 2
5. CorneliusCAG 1
RoganKCM 1
Allen2TM 1
Smith2TM 1

Innings Pitched

Innings Pitched

1. Smith2TM 135.1
2. HoustonCT 129.2
3. CorneliusCAG 110.0
4. JohnsonSL2 97.1
5. Moss3TM 88.0
6. Kranson3TM 80.2
FosterCAG 80.2
8. TrentCAG 75.0
9. BarnesKCM 69.1
10. McHenryKCM 67.1

Strikeouts

Strikeouts

1. Smith2TM 106
2. HoustonCT 98
3. CorneliusCAG 70
4. Moss3TM 62
5. Kranson3TM 50
6. MarkhamKCM 47
7. FosterCAG 46
8. BarnesKCM 45
TrentCAG 45
10. McHenryKCM 42

Games Started

Games Started

1. Smith2TM 17
HoustonCT 17
3. CorneliusCAG 13
4. JohnsonSL2 11
5. McHenryKCM 10
6. Moss3TM 9
7. TrentCAG 8
MillerDTS 8
FosterCAG 8
FerrellBBB 8

Complete Games

Complete Game

1. HoustonCT 12
2. Smith2TM 9
3. JohnsonSL2 7
4. Moss3TM 6
BrutonBBB 6
CorneliusCAG 6
7. BarnesKCM 5
Cooper2TM 5
TrentCAG 5
MillerDTS 5
FerrellBBB 5
BremerCT 5

Shutouts

Shutouts<br>No runs allowed and a complete game.

1. TrentCAG 3
Smith2TM 3
3. BremerCT 2
FosterCAG 2
MitchellBBB 2
6. BlackmonCAG 1
CorneliusCAG 1
HoustonCT 1
McHenryKCM 1
Wilson2TM 1

Home Runs

Home Runs Hit/Allowed

1. GriffinSL2 7
2. BrutonBBB 6
3. JohnsonSL2 5
CorneliusCAG 5
5. FosterCAG 4
HowardBBB 4
Moss3TM 4
8. FerrellBBB 3
MillerSL2 3
MaySL2 3
MarkhamKCM 3

Bases on Balls

Bases on Balls/Walks

1. MillerDTS 40
JohnsonSL2 40
3. CorneliusCAG 35
4. Kranson3TM 31
5. FosterCAG 30
6. Smith2TM 27
GriffinSL2 27
8. BlackmonCAG 26
9. HoustonCT 23
10. FerrellBBB 22

Hits

Hits/Hits Allowed

1. JohnsonSL2 149
2. HoustonCT 120
3. Smith2TM 88
4. CorneliusCAG 86
Moss3TM 86
6. Kranson3TM 84
7. BrutonBBB 82
8. TrentCAG 79
9. FosterCAG 77
10. BlackmonCAG 71

Strikeouts / Base On Balls

<strong>SO/W or SO/BB</strong><br>For recent years, pitching leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played.<br>No batting leaders computed.

1. Moss3TM 4.769
2. HoustonCT 4.261
3. JeffersonCT 4.125
4. Cooper2TM 4.000
5. Smith2TM 3.926
6. MarkhamKCM 3.615
7. Wilson2TM 3.083
8. TrentCAG 3.000
9. BremerCT 2.727
10. BarnesKCM 2.500

Home Runs per 9 IP

<strong>9 x HR / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. BremerCT 0.000
Wilson2TM 0.000
CookIA 0.000
HannibalIA 0.000
PowellCAG 0.000
6. Smith2TM 0.133
7. McHenryKCM 0.134
8. HoustonCT 0.139
9. Cooper2TM 0.156
10. Hayslett2TM 0.189

Losses

Losses

1. JohnsonSL2 9
2. MillerDTS 6
TrentCAG 6
McHenryKCM 6
5. HughesIA 5
FosterCAG 5
Kranson3TM 5
Moss3TM 5
BryantMRS 5
10. CorneliusCAG 4
Smith2TM 4
BrutonBBB 4
FerrellBBB 4
BlackmonCAG 4

Earned Runs

Earned Runs Allowed

1. JohnsonSL2 76
2. GriffinSL2 49
3. BryantMRS 45
4. MillerDTS 40
5. BrutonBBB 37
FerrellBBB 37
7. HoustonCT 35
CorneliusCAG 35
FosterCAG 35
10. BlackmonCAG 33

Wild Pitches

Wild Pitches

1. Kranson3TM 8
2. Thomas2TM 4
JohnsonSL2 4
4. BrutonBBB 2
CorneliusCAG 2
FosterCAG 2
HowardBBB 2
TrentCAG 2
RoganKCM 2
10. CrossCAG 1
EatmonBBB 1
GriffinSL2 1
HillSL2 1
HoustonCT 1
MarkhamKCM 1
McHenryKCM 1
MillerDTS 1
PartlowCT 1
Hayslett2TM 1
Smith2TM 1
BarnesKCM 1
Wilson2TM 1

Hit By Pitch

Times Hit by a Pitch.

1. HoustonCT 7
2. MillerDTS 6
Kranson3TM 6
4. PowellCAG 4
AdamsMRS 4
WebsterDTS 4
Moss3TM 4
FerrellBBB 4
9. BarnesKCM 3
DavisDTS 3
CorneliusCAG 3
BryantMRS 3

Batters Faced

Batters Faced

1. HoustonCT 548
2. Smith2TM 511
3. JohnsonSL2 479
4. CorneliusCAG 448
5. Moss3TM 375
6. Kranson3TM 371
7. FosterCAG 358
8. TrentCAG 321
9. McHenryKCM 283
10. BarnesKCM 279

Games Finished

Games Finished<br>Credited to the last pitcher to appear for a team in a game.<br>Complete Games are not counted as Games Finished.

1. BarnesKCM 7
2. FosterCAG 6
TrentCAG 6
WebsterDTS 6
5. Moss3TM 5
Kranson3TM 5
McHenryKCM 5
CorneliusCAG 5
9. PowellCAG 4
RadcliffeCT 4
Smith2TM 4
EatmonBBB 4
GriffinSL2 4

Adjusted ERA+

<strong>ERA+</strong><br>100*[lgERA/ERA]<br>Adjusted to the player&#x2019;s ballpark(s).

1. BremerCT 290
2. Smith2TM 287
3. BarnesKCM 220
4. McHenryKCM 201
5. HoustonCT 188
6. Cooper2TM 174
7. Wilson2TM 171
8. TrentCAG 166
9. CorneliusCAG 160
10. Moss3TM 155

Fielding Independent Pitching

<strong>Fielding Independent Pitching</strong><br>this stat measures a pitcher's effectiveness at preventing HR, BB, HBP and causing SO<br><tt>(13*HR + 3*(BB+HBP) - 2*SO)/IP + Constant<sub>lg</sub></tt><br>The constant is set so that each season major-league average FIP is the same as the major-league avg ERA

1. Smith2TM 2.45
2. Wilson2TM 2.51
3. HoustonCT 2.61
4. Cooper2TM 2.63
5. BremerCT 2.80
6. MarkhamKCM 2.95
7. JeffersonCT 2.97
8. Moss3TM 2.99
9. TrentCAG 3.05
10. McHenryKCM 3.06

Adj. Pitching Runs

<strong>Adjusted Pitching Runs</strong><br>A set of formulas developed by Gary Gillette, Pete Palmer and others<br>that estimates a pitcher&#x2019;s total contributions<br>to a team&#x2019;s runs total via linear weights.<br>0.0 is an avg performance, <0 is worse than avg and >0 is better than avg

1. Smith2TM 45
2. HoustonCT 28
3. CorneliusCAG 20
4. BarnesKCM 20
5. BremerCT 18
6. McHenryKCM 15
7. MitchellBBB 14
8. TrentCAG 13
9. Moss3TM 13
10. Cooper2TM 12

Adj. Pitching Wins

<strong>Adjusted Pitching Wins</strong><br>A set of formulas developed by Gary Gillette, Pete Palmer and others<br>that estimates a pitcher&#x2019;s total contributions<br>to a team&#x2019;s wins with his arm.<br>0.0 is an avg performance, <0 is worse than avg and >0 is better than avg

1. Smith2TM 4.2
2. HoustonCT 2.6
3. CorneliusCAG 1.8
4. BarnesKCM 1.8
5. BremerCT 1.7
6. MitchellBBB 1.4
7. McHenryKCM 1.3
8. Cooper2TM 1.2
TrentCAG 1.2
10. Moss3TM 1.1

More 1937 Negro American League Pages