Major League Fielding Leaders

Putouts

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Clendenon • PIT 1,450
2. White • STL 1,389
3. Cepeda • SFG 1,262
4. Siebern • KCA 1,223
5. Stuart • BOS 1,207

Assists

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Mazeroski • PIT 506
2. Hubbs • CHC 493
3. Hansen • CHW 483
4. Brinkman • WSA 462
5. Moran • LAA 455

Errors Committed

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Ward • CHW 38
2. Brinkman • WSA 37
3. Rodgers • CHC 35
4. Boyer • STL 34
5. Bailey • PIT 33

Total Zone Runs

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Hansen • CHW 25
2. Mazeroski • PIT 23
3. Callison • PHI 18
4. Allison • MIN 17
5. Boyer • NYY 16

Def. Games as C

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Edwards • CIN 148
2. Battey • MIN 146
3. Dalrymple • PHI 142
4. Roseboro • LAD 134
5. Howard • NYY 132

Putouts as C

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Edwards • CIN 1,008
2. Roseboro • LAD 908
3. Dalrymple • PHI 881
4. Battey • MIN 861
5. Howard • NYY 786

Assists as C

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Dalrymple • PHI 90
2. Edwards • CIN 87
3. Bertell • CHC 84
4. Bateman • HOU 81
5. Battey • MIN 66
Roseboro • LAD 66

Errors Committed as C

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Bateman • HOU 23
2. Dalrymple • PHI 19
3. Coleman • NYM 15
4. Rodgers • LAA 10
5. Martin • CHW 9

Double Plays Turned as C

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Dalrymple • PHI 16
Edwards • CIN 16
3. Bertell • CHC 15
4. Azcue • 2TM 13
5. Battey • MIN 11

Passed Balls

Passed Balls

1. McCarver • STL 16
Bateman • HOU 16
3. Roseboro • LAD 14
Triandos • DET 14
5. Battey • MIN 12
Rodgers • LAA 12
Martin • CHW 12

Stolen Bases Allowed as C

Pre-1950 SB & CS data for catchers is estimated from catcher assists, games started and opposition stolen bases. From 1950 on SB, CS, Pickoff, & WP data for catchers and pitchers is taken from play-by-play accounts in the retrosheet files. There are several hundred games without pbp from 1950 to 1968 and for those we may not have any data.

1. Dalrymple • PHI 56
2. Bateman • HOU 54
3. Edwards • CIN 51
4. McCarver • STL 45
5. Tillman • BOS 43

Caught Stealing as C

Pre-1950 SB & CS data for catchers is estimated from catcher assists, games started and opposition stolen bases. From 1950 on SB, CS, Pickoff, & WP data for catchers and pitchers is taken from play-by-play accounts in the retrosheet files. There are several hundred games without pbp from 1950 to 1968 and for those we may not have any data.

1. Dalrymple • PHI 50
2. Bertell • CHC 45
3. Edwards • CIN 44
4. Bateman • HOU 37
5. Coleman • NYM 29

Caught Stealing %

Caught Stealing Percentage
CS / (SB + CS)

1. Bertell • CHC 60.8
2. Sherry • NYM 51.4
3. Coleman • NYM 50.0
4. Dalrymple • PHI 47.2
5. Haller • SFG 46.9

Def. Games as 1B

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. White • STL 162
2. Stuart • BOS 155
3. Clendenon • PIT 151
4. Cepeda • SFG 150
5. Pepitone • NYY 143
Gentile • BAL 143

Putouts as 1B

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Clendenon • PIT 1,450
2. White • STL 1,389
3. Cepeda • SFG 1,262
4. Stuart • BOS 1,207
5. Siebern • KCA 1,193

Assists as 1B

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Stuart • BOS 134
2. Clendenon • PIT 118
3. Harkness • NYM 112
4. Gentile • BAL 110
5. White • STL 105

Errors Committed as 1B

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Stuart • BOS 29
2. Cepeda • SFG 21
3. Clendenon • PIT 15
4. Harkness • NYM 14
5. White • STL 13

Double Plays Turned as 1B

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Clendenon • PIT 154
2. White • STL 126
3. Gentile • BAL 122
4. Pepitone • NYY 111
5. Stuart • BOS 100

Def. Games as 2B

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Javier • STL 161
2. Rose • CIN 157
3. Lumpe • KCA 155
4. Hubbs • CHC 152
5. Moran • LAA 151

Putouts as 2B

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Javier • STL 377
2. Rose • CIN 360
3. Moran • LAA 352
4. Hunt • NYM 350
5. Lumpe • KCA 341

Assists as 2B

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Mazeroski • PIT 506
2. Hubbs • CHC 493
3. Moran • LAA 455
4. Lumpe • KCA 451
5. Richardson • NYY 424

Errors Committed as 2B

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Hunt • NYM 26
2. Javier • STL 25
3. Rose • CIN 22
Hubbs • CHC 22
Moran • LAA 22

Double Plays Turned as 2B

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Mazeroski • PIT 131
2. Bolling • MLN 107
3. Richardson • NYY 105
4. Moran • LAA 98
5. Hubbs • CHC 96

Def. Games as 3B

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Santo • CHC 162
2. Robinson • BAL 160
3. Boyer • STL 159
4. Alvis • CLE 158
Charles • KCA 158

Putouts as 3B

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Alvis • CLE 170
2. Boyer • NYY 165
3. Ward • CHW 156
4. Charles • KCA 153
Robinson • BAL 153

Assists as 3B

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Santo • CHC 374
2. Bailey • PIT 332
3. Robinson • BAL 330
4. Charles • KCA 310
5. Boyer • NYY 309

Errors Committed as 3B

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Ward • CHW 38
2. Boyer • STL 34
3. Bailey • PIT 32
4. Alvis • CLE 28
5. Santo • CHC 26
Rollins • MIN 26

Double Plays Turned as 3B

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Robinson • BAL 43
2. Bailey • PIT 38
3. Boyer • NYY 32
Alvis • CLE 32
5. Torres • LAA 29

Def. Games as SS

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Versalles • MIN 159
2. Groat • STL 158
3. Cárdenas • CIN 157
4. Fregosi • LAA 151
5. Rodgers • CHC 150

Putouts as SS

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Versalles • MIN 301
2. Aparicio • BAL 275
3. Rodgers • CHC 271
Fregosi • LAA 271
5. Cárdenas • CIN 270

Assists as SS

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Hansen • CHW 483
2. Brinkman • WSA 462
3. Rodgers • CHC 454
4. Groat • STL 448
Versalles • MIN 448

Errors Committed as SS

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Brinkman • WSA 37
2. Rodgers • CHC 35
3. Versalles • MIN 30
4. Moran • NYM 27
Fregosi • LAA 27

Double Plays Turned as SS

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Rodgers • CHC 100
2. Brinkman • WSA 97
3. Schofield • PIT 95
Hansen • CHW 95
5. Groat • STL 91

Def. Games as LF (s.1901)

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Williams • CHC 160
2. Yastrzemski • BOS 151
3. Colavito • DET 141
4. Killebrew • MIN 137
5. Wagner • LAA 136

Putouts as LF (s.1901)

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Williams • CHC 298
2. Yastrzemski • BOS 284
3. Colavito • DET 281
4. Wagner • LAA 243
5. McCovey • SFG 218

Assists as LF (s.1901)

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Yastrzemski • BOS 17
2. Williams • CHC 13
3. Colavito • DET 9
Nicholson • CHW 9
5. Thomas • NYM 8
Wagner • LAA 8

Errors Committed as LF (s.1901)

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. McCovey • SFG 13
2. Wagner • LAA 11
3. Covington • PHI 8
4. Nicholson • CHW 7
López • NYY 7

Double Plays Turned as LF (s.1901)

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Davis • LAD 3
Yastrzemski • BOS 3
3. Williams • CHC 2
Kuenn • SFG 2
5. Hall • MIN 1
López • NYY 1
Maxwell • CHW 1
Mejías • BOS 1
Nicholson • CHW 1
Powell • BAL 1
Robinson • CHW 1
Wagner • LAA 1
Davis • HOU 1
Alusik • KCA 1
Kanehl • NYM 1
Maye • MLN 1
Oliver • MLN 1
Savage • PIT 1
Spangler • HOU 1
Thomas • NYM 1
Warwick • HOU 1
Wynn • HOU 1
Skinner • 2TM 1
Burton • 2TM 1
González • PHI 1

Def. Games as CF (s.1901)

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Flood • STL 158
2. Mays • SFG 157
3. Davis • LAD 153
4. Pinson • CIN 145
5. Virdon • PIT 142

Putouts as CF (s.1901)

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Flood • STL 403
2. Mays • SFG 398
3. Lock • WSA 350
4. Bruton • DET 342
5. Davis • LAD 336

Assists as CF (s.1901)

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Davis • LAD 15
2. Flood • STL 12
3. Davalillo • CLE 10
Lock • WSA 10
5. Geiger • BOS 9

Errors Committed as CF (s.1901)

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Pinson • CIN 8
Mays • SFG 8
Davis • LAD 8
4. Pearson • LAA 6
5. Flood • STL 5
Hershberger • CHW 5
Lock • WSA 5

Double Plays Turned as CF (s.1901)

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Pearson • LAA 5
Lock • WSA 5
3. Hall • MIN 4
4. Davis • LAD 3
Bruton • DET 3
Cline • MLN 3
Hershberger • CHW 3

Def. Games as RF (s.1901)

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Aaron • MLN 161
2. Callison • PHI 156
3. Allison • MIN 146
Clinton • BOS 146
5. Alou • SFG 143
Clemente • PIT 143

Putouts as RF (s.1901)

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Clinton • BOS 313
2. Allison • MIN 309
3. Callison • PHI 299
4. Aaron • MLN 266
Brock • CHC 266

Assists as RF (s.1901)

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Callison • PHI 25
2. Brock • CHC 17
3. Cimoli • KCA 12
King • WSA 12
5. Allison • MIN 11
Aaron • MLN 11
Clemente • PIT 11

Errors Committed as RF (s.1901)

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Clemente • PIT 10
Allison • MIN 10
3. Howard • LAD 8
Brock • CHC 8
5. Clinton • BOS 6

Double Plays Turned as RF (s.1901)

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Brock • CHC 7
2. Callison • PHI 4
Allison • MIN 4
4. Cimoli • KCA 3
Robinson • CHW 3

Def. Games as OF

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Pinson • CIN 162
2. Aaron • MLN 161
3. Williams • CHC 160
4. Colavito • DET 159
5. Flood • STL 158

Putouts as OF

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Flood • STL 401
2. Mays • SFG 397
3. Lock • WSA 377
4. Pinson • CIN 357
5. Pearson • LAA 340

Assists as OF

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Callison • PHI 26
2. Yastrzemski • BOS 18
3. Brock • CHC 17
4. Davis • LAD 16
5. Cimoli • KCA 14
Lock • WSA 14

Errors Committed as OF

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. McCovey • SFG 14
2. Wagner • LAA 11
Clemente • PIT 11
4. Allison • MIN 10
5. López • NYY 9

Double Plays Turned as OF

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Brock • CHC 7
2. Lock • WSA 6
3. Pearson • LAA 5
Hall • MIN 5
5. Allison • MIN 4
Robinson • CHW 4
Callison • PHI 4

Def. Games as P

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Miller • BAL 71
2. Perranoski • LAD 69
3. Dailey • MIN 66
Radatz • BOS 66
5. Lamabe • BOS 65
Baldschun • PHI 65

Putouts as P

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Monbouquette • BOS 31
Terry • NYY 31
3. Broglio • STL 30
4. Gibson • STL 27
5. Lary • DET 26
Pappas • BAL 26

Assists as P

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Spahn • MLN 71
2. Sanford • SFG 65
3. Drysdale • LAD 62
4. Craig • NYM 60
Ellsworth • CHC 60

Errors Committed as P

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Craig • NYM 8
2. Chance • LAA 6
Seguí • KCA 6
McBean • PIT 6
5. Daniels • WSA 5
Ford • NYY 5
Baldschun • PHI 5
Cardwell • PIT 5
Gibson • STL 5
Nuxhall • CIN 5
O'Toole • CIN 5
Burdette • 2TM 5

Double Plays Turned as P

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Barber • BAL 8
Spahn • MLN 8
3. Drysdale • LAD 7
McLish • PHI 7
5. Kaat • MIN 5
Buhl • CHC 5
Jackson • NYM 5
Miller • LAD 5

Total Zone Runs as C (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Bertell • CHC 12
2. Sadowski • LAA 7
3. Dalrymple • PHI 6
4. Howard • NYY 5
5. Pagliaroni • PIT 4

Range Factor/9Inn as C

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Edwards • CIN 7.94
2. Roseboro • LAD 7.66
3. Dalrymple • PHI 7.50
4. Azcue • 2TM 7.41
5. Tillman • BOS 7.24

Range Factor/Game as C

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Edwards • CIN 7.40
2. Roseboro • LAD 7.27
3. Bailey • SFG 6.86
4. Dalrymple • PHI 6.84
5. Tillman • BOS 6.81

Fielding % as C

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Triandos • DET .998
2. Edwards • CIN .995
3. Haller • SFG .994
4. Howard • NYY .994
5. Torre • MLN .994

Total Zone Runs as 1B (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Pepitone • NYY 10
2. Cash • DET 8
3. Thomas • LAA 8
4. Harkness • NYM 7
5. Gentile • BAL 7

Range Factor/9Inn as 1B

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Banks • CHC 10.72
2. Clendenon • PIT 10.66
3. Thomas • LAA 10.52
4. Harkness • NYM 10.29
5. Siebern • KCA 9.98

Range Factor/Game as 1B

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Clendenon • PIT 10.38
2. Thomas • LAA 10.05
3. Banks • CHC 10.05
4. Siebern • KCA 9.89
5. Harkness • NYM 9.53

Fielding % as 1B

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Gentile • BAL .995
2. Pepitone • NYY .995
3. Fairly • LAD .995
4. Cash • DET .994
5. Banks • CHC .993

Total Zone Runs as 2B (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Mazeroski • PIT 23
2. Richardson • NYY 15
3. Fox • CHW 10
4. Hubbs • CHC 8
5. Held • CLE 6

Range Factor/9Inn as 2B

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Mazeroski • PIT 6.20
2. Hunt • NYM 5.71
3. Hubbs • CHC 5.64
4. Cottier • WSA 5.48
5. Moran • LAA 5.41

Range Factor/Game as 2B

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Mazeroski • PIT 6.13
2. Hubbs • CHC 5.47
3. Hunt • NYM 5.39
4. Moran • LAA 5.34
5. Lumpe • KCA 5.11

Fielding % as 2B

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Fox • CHW .988
2. Lumpe • KCA .988
3. Taylor • PHI .986
4. Gilliam • LAD .985
5. Schilling • BOS .985

Total Zone Runs as 3B (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Mathews • MLN 15
2. Boyer • NYY 14
3. Robinson • BAL 12
4. Santo • CHC 10
5. Malzone • BOS 6

Range Factor/9Inn as 3B

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Zimmer • 2TM 3.45
2. Boyer • NYY 3.43
3. Mathews • MLN 3.34
4. Santo • CHC 3.15
5. Hoak • PHI 3.09

Range Factor/Game as 3B

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Boyer • NYY 3.36
2. Mathews • MLN 3.21
3. Santo • CHC 3.15
4. Zimmer • 2TM 3.13
5. Robinson • BAL 3.02

Fielding % as 3B

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Robinson • BAL .976
2. Mathews • MLN .968
3. Malzone • BOS .964
4. Davenport • SFG .962
5. Phillips • DET .961

Total Zone Runs as SS (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Hansen • CHW 25
2. Menke • MLN 11
3. Kubek • NYY 11
4. Causey • KCA 10
5. Wine • PHI 9

Range Factor/9Inn as SS

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Schofield • PIT 5.27
2. Hansen • CHW 5.18
3. Menke • MLN 5.09
4. Causey • KCA 5.06
5. Brinkman • WSA 5.01

Range Factor/Game as SS

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Schofield • PIT 5.11
2. Hansen • CHW 5.07
3. Causey • KCA 4.95
4. Brinkman • WSA 4.92
5. Rodgers • CHC 4.83

Fielding % as SS

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Aparicio • BAL .983
2. Hansen • CHW .983
3. Kubek • NYY .980
4. Causey • KCA .978
5. Cárdenas • CIN .972

Total Zone Runs as LF (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Colavito • DET 14
2. Yastrzemski • BOS 13
3. Williams • CHC 11
4. Tresh • NYY 6
5. Maye • MLN 4

Range Factor/9Inn as LF (s.1948)

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Colavito • DET 2.09
2. Spangler • HOU 2.08
3. Hinton • WSA 2.05
4. Yastrzemski • BOS 2.00
5. James • STL 1.98

Range Factor/Game as LF (s.1901)

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Colavito • DET 2.06
2. Yastrzemski • BOS 1.99
3. Williams • CHC 1.94
4. Wagner • LAA 1.85
5. Spangler • HOU 1.83

Fielding % as LF (s.1901)

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Colavito • DET .993
2. Williams • CHC .987
3. Killebrew • MIN .987
4. Francona • CLE .986
5. Robinson • CIN .982

Total Zone Runs as CF (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Flood • STL 15
2. Mays • SFG 12
3. Hall • MIN 10
4. Cline • MLN 10
5. Davis • LAD 9

Range Factor/9Inn as CF (s.1948)

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Davalillo • CLE 2.94
2. Lock • WSA 2.84
3. Hall • MIN 2.83
4. Geiger • BOS 2.79
5. Bruton • DET 2.70

Range Factor/Game as CF (s.1901)

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Davalillo • CLE 2.91
2. Lock • WSA 2.69
3. Geiger • BOS 2.67
4. Flood • STL 2.63
5. Mays • SFG 2.59

Fielding % as CF (s.1901)

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Goss • HOU .993
2. Landis • CHW .993
3. Bruton • DET .991
4. Green • MIN .989
5. Flood • STL .988

Total Zone Runs as RF (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Callison • PHI 18
2. Allison • MIN 17
3. Clinton • BOS 15
4. Brock • CHC 9
5. Cimoli • KCA 7

Range Factor/9Inn as RF (s.1948)

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Allison • MIN 2.31
2. Clinton • BOS 2.20
3. Brock • CHC 2.12
4. Maris • NYY 2.12
5. Callison • PHI 2.11

Range Factor/Game as RF (s.1901)

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Clinton • BOS 2.19
Allison • MIN 2.19
3. Callison • PHI 2.08
4. Brock • CHC 2.02
5. Maris • NYY 1.93

Fielding % as RF (s.1901)

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Callison • PHI .994
2. Kaline • DET .992
3. Cimoli • KCA .988
4. King • WSA .987
5. Robinson • CHW .986

Total Zone Runs as OF (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Callison • PHI 18
2. Allison • MIN 17
3. Clinton • BOS 15
4. Flood • STL 15
5. Yastrzemski • BOS 13

Range Factor/9Inn as OF

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Davalillo • CLE 2.96
2. Geiger • BOS 2.77
3. Lock • WSA 2.75
4. Landis • CHW 2.68
5. Bruton • DET 2.68

Range Factor/Game as OF

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Davalillo • CLE 2.89
2. Lock • WSA 2.68
3. Flood • STL 2.61
4. Geiger • BOS 2.58
5. Mays • SFG 2.57

Fielding % as OF

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Demeter • PHI 1.000
2. Callison • PHI .994
3. Goss • HOU .993
4. Landis • CHW .993
5. Kaline • DET .992

Range Factor/9Inn as P

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Miller • LAD 3.32
2. Kaat • MIN 3.13
3. Daniels • WSA 3.04
4. Craig • NYM 2.97
5. Spahn • MLN 2.84

Range Factor/Game as P

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Spahn • MLN 2.48
2. Jackson • CHC 2.14
3. McBride • LAA 2.06
4. Ellsworth • CHC 2.03
5. Kaat • MIN 2.00
Herbert • CHW 2.00

Fielding % as P

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Simmons • STL 1.000
Pizarro • CHW 1.000
Buhl • CHC 1.000
Peña • KCA 1.000
Short • PHI 1.000
Rudolph • WSA 1.000
Podres • LAD 1.000
Hendley • MLN 1.000
Culp • PHI 1.000
Stigman • MIN 1.000
Monbouquette • BOS 1.000
Farrell • HOU 1.000

A ** by the stat's value indicates the player had fewer than the required number of at bats or plate appearances for the BA, OBP, SLG or OPS title that year. In order to rank the player, the necessary number of hitless at bats were added to the player's season total. The value printed here is their actual value and not the value used to rank them, therefore some numbers may appear out of order.

For rate stats, generally a minimum of 3.1 Plate Appearances/Team Game (batting), 1.0 IP/Team Game (pitching), 0.67 Gm and Chances/Team Game (fielding), 0.2 SB att/Team Game (catchers), 0.1 SB att/Team Game (baserunners only since 1951), and 0.1 decision/Team Game (W-L%) is needed for single-season leaderboards. For pitcher fielding the minimums are reduced by a third. For LF, CF, RF fielding stats, we only have reliable data since 1898, so all leaders are since 1898. Explanation of min. requirements