Federal League Pitching Leaders

Wins Above Replacement--all

<strong>Wins Above Replacement</strong><br>A single number that presents the number of wins the player added<br>to the team above what a replacement player (think AAA or AAAA) would add.<br>Scale for a single-season: 8+ MVP Quality, 5+ All-Star Quality, 2+ Starter,<br>0-2 Reserve, < 0 Replacement Level <br>Developed by Sean Smith of BaseballProjection.com

1. DavenportSLM 7.5
2. PlankSLM 7.2
3. KauffBTT 6.6
4. CrandallSLM 5.5
5. KonetchyPBS 5.0
6. RaridenNEW 4.8
7. AllenPBS 4.0
8. AndersonBUF 4.0
9. WilsonCHI 3.9
10. ZwillingCHI 3.9

WAR for Pitchers

<strong>Wins Above Replacement for Pitchers</strong><br>A single number that presents the number of wins the player added<br>to the team above what a replacement player (think AAA or AAAA) would add. This value includes defensive support and includes additional value for high leverage situations.<br>Scale: 8+ MVP Quality, 5+ All-Star Quality, 2+ Starter,<br>0-2 Reserve, < 0 Replacement Level <br> Developed by Sean Smith of BaseballProjection.com

1. DavenportSLM 8.7
2. PlankSLM 6.6
3. AllenPBS 4.7
4. AndersonBUF 4.4
5. MoseleyNEW 4.0
6. ReulbachNEW 3.9
7. CrandallSLM 3.5
8. CullopKCP 3.5
9. SchulzBUF 3.1
10. KaiserlingNEW 2.9

Earned Run Average

<strong>9 * ER / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played.<br>Bold indicates lowest ERA using current stats<br><span class=glimmer>Gold</span> means awarded ERA title at end of year.

1. MoseleyNEW 1.91
2. PlankSLM 2.08
3. BrownCHI 2.09
4. McConnellCHI 2.20
5. DavenportSLM 2.20
6. ReulbachNEW 2.23
7. KaiserlingNEW 2.24
8. CullopKCP 2.44
9. PrendergastCHI 2.48
10. AllenPBS 2.51

Wins

Wins

1. McConnellCHI 25
2. AllenPBS 23
3. DavenportSLM 22
CullopKCP 22
5. SchulzBUF 21
CrandallSLM 21
ReulbachNEW 21
PlankSLM 21
9. PackardKCP 20
10. AndersonBUF 19

Win-Loss %

<strong>Win-Loss Percentage</strong><br>W / (W + L)<br>For players, leaders need one decision for every ten team games.<br>For managers, minimum to qualify for leading is 320 games.

1. McConnellCHI .714
2. BrownCHI .680
3. ReulbachNEW .677
4. CullopKCP .667
5. PlankSLM .656
6. AllenPBS .639
7. PackardKCP .625
8. RoggePBS .607
9. SchulzBUF .600
10. AndersonBUF .594

Walks & Hits per IP

<strong>(BB + H)/IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. PlankSLM 0.991
2. DavenportSLM 1.008
3. BrownCHI 1.071
4. AndersonBUF 1.100
5. MainKCP 1.113
6. ReulbachNEW 1.119
7. PrendergastCHI 1.131
8. CullopKCP 1.141
9. PackardKCP 1.150
10. JohnsonKCP 1.152

Hits per 9 IP

<strong>9 x H / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. DavenportSLM 6.876
2. MainKCP 7.083
3. PlankSLM 7.111
4. BrownCHI 7.197
5. AndersonBUF 7.200
6. AllenPBS 7.306
7. KrappBUF 7.325
8. MoseleyNEW 7.455
9. SchulzBUF 7.673
10. ReulbachNEW 7.767

Bases On Balls per 9 IP

<strong>9 x BB / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. PlankSLM 1.811
2. BenderBAL 1.867
3. HearnPBS 1.896
4. CullopKCP 1.994
5. QuinnBAL 2.072
6. DavenportSLM 2.200
7. CrandallSLM 2.216
8. JohnsonKCP 2.271
9. ReulbachNEW 2.300
10. BedientBUF 2.306

Strikeouts per 9 IP

<strong>9 x SO / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. AndersonBUF 5.325
2. DavenportSLM 5.249
3. PlankSLM 4.930
4. Bailey2TM 4.909
5. GroomSLM 4.780
6. MoseleyNEW 4.769
7. SchulzBUF 4.650
8. BenderBAL 4.492
9. McConnellCHI 4.485
10. AllenPBS 4.034

Games Played

Games Played or Pitched

1. DavenportSLM 55
2. BedientBUF 53
3. CrandallSLM 51
4. JohnsonKCP 46
5. QuinnBAL 44
CullopKCP 44
McConnellCHI 44
Seaton2TM 44
9. SchulzBUF 42
PrendergastCHI 42
PlankSLM 42
PackardKCP 42

Saves

Saves

1. BedientBUF 10
2. BargerPBS 6
3. WiltseBTT 5
4. Seaton2TM 4
UphamBTT 4
HendrixCHI 4
BrownCHI 4
8. SuggsBAL 3
PlankSLM 3
KnetzerPBS 3
MainKCP 3

Innings Pitched

Innings Pitched

1. DavenportSLM 392.2
2. CrandallSLM 312.2
3. SchulzBUF 309.2
4. McConnellCHI 303.0
5. CullopKCP 302.1
6. HendrixCHI 285.0
7. AllenPBS 283.1
8. PackardKCP 281.2
9. JohnsonKCP 281.1
10. KnetzerPBS 279.0

Strikeouts

Strikeouts

1. DavenportSLM 229
2. SchulzBUF 160
3. McConnellCHI 151
4. PlankSLM 147
5. AndersonBUF 142
MoseleyNEW 142
7. AllenPBS 127
8. Bailey2TM 122
9. KnetzerPBS 120
10. JohnsonKCP 118
QuinnBAL 118

Games Started

Games Started

1. DavenportSLM 46
2. SchulzBUF 38
3. AllenPBS 37
4. CullopKCP 36
5. McConnellCHI 35
6. Seaton2TM 34
JohnsonKCP 34
8. KnetzerPBS 33
CrandallSLM 33
10. MoseleyNEW 32

Complete Games

Complete Game

1. DavenportSLM 30
2. HendrixCHI 26
3. SchulzBUF 25
4. AllenPBS 24
5. ReulbachNEW 23
McConnellCHI 23
PlankSLM 23
8. KnetzerPBS 22
CrandallSLM 22
CullopKCP 22
MoseleyNEW 22

Shutouts

Shutouts<br>No runs allowed and a complete game.

1. DavenportSLM 10
2. AllenPBS 6
PlankSLM 6
4. KaiserlingNEW 5
Bailey2TM 5
SchulzBUF 5
RoggePBS 5
PackardKCP 5
MoseleyNEW 5
HendrixCHI 5
AndersonBUF 5

Home Runs

Home Runs Hit/Allowed

1. SuggsBAL 12
2. AllenPBS 9
Bailey2TM 9
QuinnBAL 9
5. SchulzBUF 8
McConnellCHI 8
CullopKCP 8
8. Smith2TM 7
Seaton2TM 7
Lafitte2TM 7
Falkenberg2TM 7
HendrixCHI 7
FordBUF 7

Bases on Balls

Bases on Balls/Walks

1. SchulzBUF 149
2. Bailey2TM 125
3. KrappBUF 123
4. Seaton2TM 120
5. AllenPBS 100
6. MoseleyNEW 99
7. DavenportSLM 96
8. RoggePBS 93
9. McConnellCHI 89
KnetzerPBS 89

Hits

Hits/Hits Allowed

1. CrandallSLM 307
2. DavenportSLM 300
3. QuinnBAL 289
4. SuggsBAL 288
5. BedientBUF 284
6. CullopKCP 278
7. SchulzBUF 264
8. McConnellCHI 262
9. Seaton2TM 260
10. KnetzerPBS 256
HendrixCHI 256

Strikeouts / Base On Balls

<strong>SO/W or SO/BB</strong><br>For recent years, pitching leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played.<br>No batting leaders computed.

1. PlankSLM 2.722
2. BenderBAL 2.405
3. DavenportSLM 2.385
4. AndersonBUF 1.972
5. QuinnBAL 1.873
6. McConnellCHI 1.697
7. ReulbachNEW 1.696
8. JohnsonKCP 1.662
9. CullopKCP 1.657
10. Falkenberg2TM 1.627

Home Runs per 9 IP

<strong>9 x HR / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. PlankSLM 0.034
2. KaiserlingNEW 0.034
3. MarionBTT 0.043
4. MoseleyNEW 0.067
5. BrownCHI 0.076
6. FinneranBTT 0.084
7. MoranNEW 0.088
8. PackardKCP 0.096
9. ReulbachNEW 0.100
10. BluejacketBTT 0.111

Losses

Losses

1. QuinnBAL 22
2. Bailey2TM 20
3. KrappBUF 19
4. BedientBUF 18
DavenportSLM 18
6. Seaton2TM 17
SuggsBAL 17
JohnsonKCP 17
9. BenderBAL 16
10. MoseleyNEW 15
HendrixCHI 15
HenningKCP 15
CrandallSLM 15
KaiserlingNEW 15
Johnson2TM 15

Earned Runs

Earned Runs Allowed

1. Seaton2TM 112
2. SuggsBAL 107
3. Bailey2TM 106
SchulzBUF 106
5. QuinnBAL 105
6. DavenportSLM 96
7. HendrixCHI 95
BedientBUF 95
9. CrandallSLM 90
KrappBUF 90

Wild Pitches

Wild Pitches

1. JohnsonKCP 13
2. HendrixCHI 11
3. McConnellCHI 10
4. FinneranBTT 9
5. Seaton2TM 8
ReulbachNEW 8
7. AllenPBS 7
MoseleyNEW 7
DavenportSLM 7
Lafitte2TM 7

Hit By Pitch

Times Hit by a Pitch.

1. MoranNEW 18
2. AllenPBS 11
3. Falkenberg2TM 10
CrandallSLM 10
5. RoggePBS 9
KaiserlingNEW 9
FinneranBTT 9
PackardKCP 9
CullopKCP 9
Bailey2TM 9

Batters Faced

Batters Faced

1. DavenportSLM 1,497
2. SchulzBUF 1,263
3. CrandallSLM 1,256
4. McConnellCHI 1,228
5. CullopKCP 1,192
6. HendrixCHI 1,149
7. JohnsonKCP 1,126
Seaton2TM 1,126
9. AllenPBS 1,122
10. PackardKCP 1,117

Games Finished

Games Finished<br>Credited to the last pitcher to appear for a team in a game.<br>Complete Games are not counted as Games Finished.

1. BargerPBS 19
BedientBUF 19
3. LeClair3TM 17
4. HenningKCP 16
UphamBTT 16
6. WillettSLM 13
7. MarshallBUF 12
QuinnBAL 12
Bailey2TM 12
Smith2TM 12

Adjusted ERA+

<strong>ERA+</strong><br>100*[lgERA/ERA]<br>Adjusted to the player&#x2019;s ballpark(s).

1. PlankSLM 153
2. MoseleyNEW 151
3. DavenportSLM 145
4. BrownCHI 135
5. ReulbachNEW 129
6. KaiserlingNEW 129
7. McConnellCHI 128
8. AndersonBUF 126
9. CrandallSLM 123
10. AllenPBS 121

Fielding Independent Pitching

<strong>Fielding Independent Pitching</strong><br>this stat measures a pitcher's effectiveness at preventing HR, BB, HBP and causing SO<br><tt>(13*HR + 3*(BB+HBP) - 2*SO)/IP + Constant<sub>lg</sub></tt><br>The constant is set so that each season major-league average FIP is the same as the major-league avg ERA

1. PlankSLM 2.00
2. DavenportSLM 2.18
3. AndersonBUF 2.43
4. ReulbachNEW 2.49
5. BenderBAL 2.52
6. MoseleyNEW 2.58
7. BrownCHI 2.62
8. JohnsonKCP 2.64
9. PackardKCP 2.66
10. BedientBUF 2.67

Adj. Pitching Runs

<strong>Adjusted Pitching Runs</strong><br>A set of formulas developed by Gary Gillette, Pete Palmer and others<br>that estimates a pitcher&#x2019;s total contributions<br>to a team&#x2019;s runs total via linear weights.<br>0.0 is an avg performance, <0 is worse than avg and >0 is better than avg

1. DavenportSLM 44
2. PlankSLM 33
3. MoseleyNEW 25
4. AllenPBS 21
5. ReulbachNEW 20
6. CrandallSLM 20
7. McConnellCHI 19
8. AndersonBUF 19
9. BrownCHI 19
10. CullopKCP 18

Adj. Pitching Wins

<strong>Adjusted Pitching Wins</strong><br>A set of formulas developed by Gary Gillette, Pete Palmer and others<br>that estimates a pitcher&#x2019;s total contributions<br>to a team&#x2019;s wins with his arm.<br>0.0 is an avg performance, <0 is worse than avg and >0 is better than avg

1. DavenportSLM 5.0
2. PlankSLM 3.8
3. MoseleyNEW 2.8
4. AllenPBS 2.3
5. ReulbachNEW 2.2
6. CrandallSLM 2.2
7. McConnellCHI 2.1
8. AndersonBUF 2.1
BrownCHI 2.1
10. CullopKCP 1.9

Base-Out Runs Saved (RE24)

<strong>Base-Out Runs Saved</strong><br>Given the bases occupied/out situation, how many runs did the pitcher<br>save in the resulting play. Compared to average, so 0 is average, and<br>above 0 is better than average

1. DavenportSLM 71.51
2. PlankSLM 36.21
3. AllenPBS 34.28
4. KaiserlingNEW 29.47
5. AndersonBUF 26.43
6. CullopKCP 25.17
7. MoseleyNEW 24.86
8. CrandallSLM 23.36
9. McConnellCHI 22.98
10. BrownCHI 20.87

Win Probability Added (WPA)

<strong>Win Probability Added by Pitcher</strong><br>Given average teams, this is the change in probability.<br>A change of +/- 1 would indicate one win added or lost.

1. DavenportSLM 5.9
2. AllenPBS 5.5
3. PlankSLM 5.2
4. AndersonBUF 3.4
5. KaiserlingNEW 3.3
6. RoggePBS 3.2
7. CrandallSLM 3.0
8. CullopKCP 3.0
9. ReulbachNEW 3.0
10. MoseleyNEW 2.9

Sit. Wins Saved (WPA/LI)

<strong>Situational Wins (WPA/LI)</strong><br>It is the sum of WPA divided by the leverage index for each play.<br>WPA depends greatly on the context of the at bats.<br>This stat does not.

1. DavenportSLM 8.5
2. PlankSLM 4.4
3. AllenPBS 3.3
4. AndersonBUF 3.1
5. MoseleyNEW 2.9
6. CullopKCP 2.6
7. KaiserlingNEW 2.5
8. McConnellCHI 2.5
9. BrownCHI 2.4
10. PrendergastCHI 2.2

Championship WPA (cWPA)

<strong>Championship Win Probability Added by Pitcher</strong><br>Given average teams, this is the change in probability, displayed in percentage points.<br>A change of +/- 100% would indicate one world series win added or lost.

1. AllenPBS 19.1
2. KnetzerPBS 17.7
3. DavenportSLM 17.4
4. PlankSLM 13.1
5. Bailey2TM 12.2
6. CrandallSLM 11.8
7. CullopKCP 7.2
8. BrownCHI 7.0
9. RoggePBS 5.1
10. MoranNEW 3.7

Base-Out Wins Saved (REW)

<strong>Base-Out Wins Saved</strong><br>This is the number of wins above average the player was worth by their performance<br>measured by the 24 base-out situations.

1. DavenportSLM 8.2
2. PlankSLM 4.0
3. AllenPBS 3.9
4. KaiserlingNEW 3.4
5. AndersonBUF 2.9
6. MoseleyNEW 2.9
7. CullopKCP 2.9
8. McConnellCHI 2.7
9. CrandallSLM 2.5
10. BrownCHI 2.4