American League Fielding Leaders

Putouts

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Raleigh • SEA 1,138
2. Perez • KCR 1,064
3. Schanuel • LAA 1,018
4. Naylor • CLE 1,008
5. Langeliers • OAK 1,007

Assists

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Neto • LAA 405
2. Giménez • CLE 396
3. Semien • TEX 389
4. Peña • HOU 380
5. Henderson • BAL 378

Errors Committed

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Henderson • BAL 25
2. Peña • HOU 19
3. Torres • NYY 18
Neto • LAA 18
5. Volpe • NYY 16

Total Zone Runs

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Varsho • TOR 16
2. Abreu • BOS 16
3. Meyers • HOU 16
4. Walls • TBR 15
5. Rodríguez • SEA 15

Def. Games as C

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Raleigh • SEA 135
2. Langeliers • OAK 131
3. O'Hoppe • LAA 127
4. Heim • TEX 119
5. Naylor • CLE 115

Putouts as C

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Raleigh • SEA 1,138
2. Langeliers • OAK 1,007
3. Heim • TEX 967
4. O'Hoppe • LAA 962
5. Diaz • HOU 919

Assists as C

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Raleigh • SEA 51
Langeliers • OAK 51
3. Kirk • TOR 46
4. Wong • BOS 41
O'Hoppe • LAA 41

Errors Committed as C

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Wells • NYY 11
2. Rortvedt • TBR 9
3. McCann • BAL 8
4. Heim • TEX 7
Kirk • TOR 7

Double Plays Turned as C

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Kelly • 2TM 8
Raleigh • SEA 8
3. Perez • KCR 7
4. Kirk • TOR 6
5. Diaz • HOU 5
Wells • NYY 5
Langeliers • OAK 5
Heim • TEX 5

Passed Balls

Passed Balls

1. Lee • CHW 9
2. Kirk • TOR 7
Langeliers • OAK 7
Naylor • CLE 7
5. Rortvedt • TBR 6

Stolen Bases Allowed as C

Pre-1950 SB & CS data for catchers is estimated from catcher assists, games started and opposition stolen bases. From 1950 on SB, CS, Pickoff, & WP data for catchers and pitchers is taken from play-by-play accounts in the retrosheet files. There are several hundred games without pbp from 1950 to 1968 and for those we may not have any data.

1. Heim • TEX 98
2. O'Hoppe • LAA 84
3. Rutschman • BAL 82
4. Diaz • HOU 81
Raleigh • SEA 81

Caught Stealing as C

Pre-1950 SB & CS data for catchers is estimated from catcher assists, games started and opposition stolen bases. From 1950 on SB, CS, Pickoff, & WP data for catchers and pitchers is taken from play-by-play accounts in the retrosheet files. There are several hundred games without pbp from 1950 to 1968 and for those we may not have any data.

1. Raleigh • SEA 32
2. O'Hoppe • LAA 30
3. Langeliers • OAK 29
4. Kirk • TOR 27
5. Lee • CHW 25

Caught Stealing %

Caught Stealing Percentage
CS / (SB + CS)

1. Fermin • KCR 44.7
2. Kirk • TOR 31.0
3. Raleigh • SEA 28.3
4. Jackson • TBR 28.2
5. Langeliers • OAK 26.9

Def. Games as 1B

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Santana • MIN 146
2. Schanuel • LAA 144
3. Lowe • TEX 138
4. Naylor • CLE 137
5. Vaughn • CHW 122

Putouts as 1B

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Schanuel • LAA 1,018
2. Naylor • CLE 1,008
3. Santana • MIN 998
4. Lowe • TEX 983
5. Guerrero • TOR 873

Assists as 1B

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Santana • MIN 92
Lowe • TEX 92
3. Schanuel • LAA 76
Smith • BOS 76
Vaughn • CHW 76

Errors Committed as 1B

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Guerrero • TOR 10
2. Naylor • CLE 9
Díaz • TBR 9
4. Singleton • HOU 8
5. Smith • BOS 7
Schanuel • LAA 7

Double Plays Turned as 1B

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Schanuel • LAA 127
2. Naylor • CLE 110
3. Guerrero • TOR 90
4. Pasquantino • KCR 76
5. Vaughn • CHW 75

Def. Games as 2B

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Semien • TEX 159
2. Torres • NYY 153
3. Giménez • CLE 152
4. Altuve • HOU 147
5. Gelof • OAK 138

Putouts as 2B

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Gelof • OAK 264
2. Torres • NYY 234
3. Giménez • CLE 233
4. Semien • TEX 214
5. Keith • DET 194

Assists as 2B

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Giménez • CLE 396
2. Semien • TEX 389
3. Gelof • OAK 332
4. Torres • NYY 330
5. Altuve • HOU 312

Errors Committed as 2B

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Torres • NYY 18
2. Keith • DET 12
3. Giménez • CLE 9
4. Semien • TEX 7
Polanco • SEA 7
Gelof • OAK 7

Double Plays Turned as 2B

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Giménez • CLE 93
2. Gelof • OAK 92
3. Altuve • HOU 85
4. Semien • TEX 77
5. Torres • NYY 74

Def. Games as 3B

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Bregman • HOU 142
2. Rojas • SEA 131
3. Devers • BOS 130
4. Ramírez • CLE 126
5. Garcia • KCR 124

Putouts as 3B

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Bregman • HOU 103
2. Devers • BOS 102
3. Ramírez • CLE 99
4. Rojas • SEA 79
5. Garcia • KCR 66

Assists as 3B

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Bregman • HOU 242
2. Ramírez • CLE 207
3. Garcia • KCR 203
4. Rojas • SEA 186
5. Devers • BOS 185

Errors Committed as 3B

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Devers • BOS 12
2. Garcia • KCR 11
3. Bregman • HOU 10
Rojas • SEA 10
Clement • TOR 10

Double Plays Turned as 3B

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Ramírez • CLE 23
Bregman • HOU 23
3. Devers • BOS 19
4. Clement • TOR 16
5. Rojas • SEA 15

Def. Games as SS

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Volpe • NYY 160
Witt • KCR 160
3. Peña • HOU 157
Henderson • BAL 157
5. Neto • LAA 155

Putouts as SS

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Henderson • BAL 232
2. Neto • LAA 231
3. Peña • HOU 221
4. Volpe • NYY 210
5. Witt • KCR 207

Assists as SS

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Neto • LAA 405
2. Peña • HOU 380
3. Henderson • BAL 378
4. Witt • KCR 361
5. Volpe • NYY 344

Errors Committed as SS

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Henderson • BAL 25
2. Peña • HOU 19
3. Neto • LAA 18
4. Volpe • NYY 16
5. Witt • KCR 15

Double Plays Turned as SS

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Neto • LAA 103
2. Peña • HOU 86
3. Witt • KCR 78
4. Rocchio • CLE 75
5. Henderson • BAL 71

Def. Games as LF (s.1901)

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Verdugo • NYY 141
Ward • LAA 141
3. Arozarena • 2TM 140
4. Benintendi • CHW 124
5. Melendez • KCR 120

Putouts as LF (s.1901)

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Ward • LAA 302
2. Verdugo • NYY 268
3. Arozarena • 2TM 258
4. Benintendi • CHW 244
5. Kwan • CLE 205

Assists as LF (s.1901)

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Andujar • OAK 10
2. Kwan • CLE 9
3. Langford • TEX 8
Ward • LAA 8
5. Verdugo • NYY 7

Errors Committed as LF (s.1901)

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Ward • LAA 5
Dubón • HOU 5
Duran • BOS 5
4. Benintendi • CHW 3
O'Neill • BOS 3
Greene • DET 3

Double Plays Turned as LF (s.1901)

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Kwan • CLE 3
2. Andujar • OAK 1
Carter • TEX 1
Fry • CLE 1
Greene • DET 1
Julks • CHW 1
Langford • TEX 1
Melendez • KCR 1
Varsho • TOR 1
Verdugo • NYY 1
Wallner • MIN 1

Def. Games as CF (s.1901)

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Bleday • OAK 157
2. Taveras • TEX 148
3. Meyers • HOU 144
4. Mullins • BAL 140
5. Isbel • KCR 136

Putouts as CF (s.1901)

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Bleday • OAK 392
2. Taveras • TEX 376
3. Meyers • HOU 349
4. Siri • TBR 336
5. Rodríguez • SEA 334

Assists as CF (s.1901)

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Taveras • TEX 9
2. Duran • BOS 8
Freeman • CLE 8
Bleday • OAK 8
5. Rafaela • BOS 5

Errors Committed as CF (s.1901)

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Siri • TBR 7
2. Fletcher • CHW 6
3. Bleday • OAK 5
Rodríguez • SEA 5
5. Isbel • KCR 4

Double Plays Turned as CF (s.1901)

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Duran • BOS 2
Freeman • CLE 2
Grisham • NYY 2
Judge • NYY 2
Rafaela • BOS 2
Taveras • TEX 2

Def. Games as RF (s.1901)

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Soto • NYY 145
2. García • TEX 131
3. Santander • BAL 130
4. Abreu • BOS 125
5. Butler • OAK 123
Springer • TOR 123

Putouts as RF (s.1901)

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Soto • NYY 289
2. Santander • BAL 262
3. García • TEX 253
4. Butler • OAK 251
5. Adell • LAA 228

Assists as RF (s.1901)

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Abreu • BOS 9
Soto • NYY 9
Renfroe • KCR 9
4. Santander • BAL 7
5. Fletcher • CHW 6

Errors Committed as RF (s.1901)

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Abreu • BOS 7
2. Haniger • SEA 5
3. O'Neill • BOS 4
Adell • LAA 4
Butler • OAK 4
Lowe • TBR 4
García • TEX 4

Double Plays Turned as RF (s.1901)

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. García • TEX 3
2. Tucker • HOU 2
DeLuca • TBR 2
Santander • BAL 2
Abreu • BOS 2
Renfroe • KCR 2

Def. Games as OF

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. Duran • BOS 160
2. Bleday • OAK 157
3. Soto • NYY 151
4. Verdugo • NYY 149
5. Taveras • TEX 148

Putouts as OF

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Bleday • OAK 392
2. Taveras • TEX 376
3. Duran • BOS 356
4. Meyers • HOU 349
5. Siri • TBR 336

Assists as OF

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Duran • BOS 12
2. Andujar • OAK 10
Soto • NYY 10
4. Abreu • BOS 9
Renfroe • KCR 9
Taveras • TEX 9
Kwan • CLE 9

Errors Committed as OF

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Abreu • BOS 7
Siri • TBR 7
O'Neill • BOS 7
4. Duran • BOS 6
Fletcher • CHW 6
Dubón • HOU 6

Double Plays Turned as OF

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. García • TEX 3
Kwan • CLE 3
3. Abreu • BOS 2
Judge • NYY 2
Grisham • NYY 2
Santander • BAL 2
Taveras • TEX 2
Freeman • CLE 2
Duran • BOS 2
Tucker • HOU 2
DeLuca • TBR 2
Renfroe • KCR 2
Rafaela • BOS 2

Def. Games as P

<strong>Defensive Games Played</strong>Games played at this position.

1. McFarland • OAK 79
2. Abreu • HOU 78
Gaddis • CLE 78
4. Herrin • CLE 75
5. Clase • CLE 74
Smith • CLE 74

Putouts as P

<strong>Putouts</strong>

1. Houck • BOS 32
2. Eovaldi • TEX 29
3. Gilbert • SEA 26
4. Bello • BOS 20
5. Blanco • HOU 19
Brown • HOU 19

Assists as P

<strong>Assists</strong>

1. Lugo • KCR 29
2. Bibee • CLE 21
Hill • 2TM 21
4. Canning • LAA 20
Flexen • CHW 20
Wacha • KCR 20
Eflin • 2TM 20

Errors Committed as P

<strong>Fielding Errors</strong>

1. Burnes • BAL 4
Marsh • KCR 4
3. Banks • CHW 3
Blanco • HOU 3
Gilbert • SEA 3
Gil • NYY 3
Skubal • DET 3
Smith • KCR 3
Woods Richardson • MIN 3
Richards • 2TM 3

Double Plays Turned as P

<strong>Double Plays as Defender</strong>

1. Lorenzen • 2TM 4
Mize • DET 4
3. Lugo • KCR 3
Soriano • LAA 3
Valdez • HOU 3
Wacha • KCR 3
Flexen • CHW 3
Pepiot • TBR 3
Bassitt • TOR 3
Maeda • DET 3

Total Zone Runs as C (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Fermin • KCR 13
2. Raleigh • SEA 6
3. Kirk • TOR 6
4. Wells • NYY 5
5. Rogers • DET 5

Range Factor/9Inn as C

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Vázquez • MIN 10.03
2. Hedges • CLE 9.94
3. Jeffers • MIN 9.75
4. Diaz • HOU 9.74
5. Wells • NYY 9.54

Range Factor/Game as C

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Diaz • HOU 9.36
2. Vázquez • MIN 9.31
3. Jeffers • MIN 9.07
4. Rutschman • BAL 8.84
5. Raleigh • SEA 8.81

Fielding % as C

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Rogers • DET .996
2. Diaz • HOU .996
3. Rutschman • BAL .996
4. Kelly • 2TM .996
5. Wong • BOS .995

Total Zone Runs as 1B (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Santana • MIN 13
2. Smith • BOS 9
3. Lowe • TEX 8
4. Perez • KCR 6
5. Pasquantino • KCR 4

Range Factor/9Inn as 1B

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Pasquantino • KCR 8.83
2. Mountcastle • BAL 8.57
3. Torkelson • DET 8.54
4. Guerrero • TOR 8.27
5. Schanuel • LAA 8.13

Range Factor/Game as 1B

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Pasquantino • KCR 8.50
2. Torkelson • DET 8.43
3. Mountcastle • BAL 8.19
4. Naylor • CLE 7.86
5. Guerrero • TOR 7.79

Fielding % as 1B

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Mountcastle • BAL .997
2. Santana • MIN .996
3. Vaughn • CHW .996
4. Lowe • TEX .995
5. Schanuel • LAA .994

Total Zone Runs as 2B (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Giménez • CLE 12
2. Semien • TEX 12
3. Kiner-Falefa • TOR 6
4. Gelof • OAK 5
5. Palacios • TBR 4

Range Factor/9Inn as 2B

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Gelof • OAK 4.43
2. Massey • KCR 4.32
3. Giménez • CLE 4.25
4. Keith • DET 4.17
5. Lopez • CHW 3.94

Range Factor/Game as 2B

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Gelof • OAK 4.32
2. Giménez • CLE 4.14
3. Semien • TEX 3.79
4. Keith • DET 3.78
5. Torres • NYY 3.69

Fielding % as 2B

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Altuve • HOU .989
2. Semien • TEX .989
3. Gelof • OAK .988
4. Giménez • CLE .986
5. Polanco • SEA .981

Total Zone Runs as 3B (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Bregman • HOU 12
2. Caballero • TBR 7
3. Clement • TOR 6
4. Duran • TEX 4
5. Lee • MIN 3

Range Factor/9Inn as 3B

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Clement • TOR 2.82
2. Smith • TEX 2.56
3. Bregman • HOU 2.51
4. Rojas • SEA 2.50
5. Ramírez • CLE 2.49

Range Factor/Game as 3B

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Bregman • HOU 2.43
2. Ramírez • CLE 2.43
3. Smith • TEX 2.24
4. Devers • BOS 2.21
5. Garcia • KCR 2.17

Fielding % as 3B

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Bregman • HOU .972
2. Ramírez • CLE .971
3. Rojas • SEA .964
4. Garcia • KCR .961
5. Devers • BOS .960

Total Zone Runs as SS (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Walls • TBR 15
2. Neto • LAA 13
3. Crawford • SEA 12
4. Rocchio • CLE 9
5. Peña • HOU 6

Range Factor/9Inn as SS

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Neto • LAA 4.30
2. Henderson • BAL 3.97
3. Peña • HOU 3.90
4. Seager • TEX 3.83
5. Rafaela • BOS 3.78

Range Factor/Game as SS

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Neto • LAA 4.10
2. Henderson • BAL 3.89
3. Peña • HOU 3.83
4. Seager • TEX 3.61
5. Witt • KCR 3.55

Fielding % as SS

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Seager • TEX .983
2. Witt • KCR .974
3. Rocchio • CLE .974
4. Neto • LAA .972
5. Volpe • NYY .972

Total Zone Runs as LF (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Verdugo • NYY 13
2. Cowser • BAL 9
3. Varsho • TOR 8
4. Andujar • OAK 8
5. Duran • BOS 8

Range Factor/9Inn as LF (s.1948)

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Cowser • BAL 2.27
2. Ward • LAA 2.25
3. Schneider • TOR 2.24
4. Benintendi • CHW 2.16
5. Greene • DET 2.06

Range Factor/Game as LF (s.1901)

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Ward • LAA 2.20
2. Benintendi • CHW 1.99
3. Verdugo • NYY 1.95
4. Greene • DET 1.90
5. Arozarena • 2TM 1.88

Fielding % as LF (s.1901)

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Verdugo • NYY .996
2. Kwan • CLE .995
3. Cowser • BAL .995
4. Arozarena • 2TM .992
5. Melendez • KCR .990

Total Zone Runs as CF (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Meyers • HOU 16
2. Rodríguez • SEA 15
3. Meadows • DET 13
4. Siri • TBR 11
5. Moniak • LAA 10

Range Factor/9Inn as CF (s.1948)

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Siri • TBR 2.89
2. Taveras • TEX 2.82
3. Bleday • OAK 2.78
4. Robert • CHW 2.77
5. Meyers • HOU 2.76

Range Factor/Game as CF (s.1901)

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Siri • TBR 2.63
2. Robert • CHW 2.63
3. Taveras • TEX 2.60
4. Rodríguez • SEA 2.58
5. Bleday • OAK 2.55

Fielding % as CF (s.1901)

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Meyers • HOU .997
2. Mullins • BAL .996
3. Taveras • TEX .992
4. Bleday • OAK .988
5. Isbel • KCR .987

Total Zone Runs as RF (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Abreu • BOS 17
2. Tucker • HOU 8
3. Adell • LAA 8
4. Canzone • SEA 6
5. Noel • CLE 5

Range Factor/9Inn as RF (s.1948)

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Butler • OAK 2.38
2. Santander • BAL 2.16
3. Abreu • BOS 2.16
4. Haniger • SEA 2.13
5. Soto • NYY 2.10

Range Factor/Game as RF (s.1901)

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Santander • BAL 2.07
2. Butler • OAK 2.06
3. Soto • NYY 2.06
4. García • TEX 1.97
5. Adell • LAA 1.94

Fielding % as RF (s.1901)

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Soto • NYY .993
2. Santander • BAL .993
3. Springer • TOR .991
4. Renfroe • KCR .991
5. García • TEX .985

Total Zone Runs as OF (s.1953)

<strong>Total Zone Total Fielding Runs Above Avg</strong><br>The number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made.<br>This number combines the R<em>tz</em>, R<em>dp</em>, R<em>of</em>, R<em>catch</em> numbers into a total defensive contribution.<br>See the <a href="/about/total_zone.shtml">glossary section</a> for a more complete explanation.<br><em>Provided by BaseballProjection.com</em>

1. Varsho • TOR 16
2. Abreu • BOS 16
3. Meyers • HOU 16
4. Rodríguez • SEA 15
5. Meadows • DET 13

Range Factor/9Inn as OF

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Siri • TBR 2.89
2. Taveras • TEX 2.82
3. Bleday • OAK 2.78
4. Robert • CHW 2.77
5. Meyers • HOU 2.76

Range Factor/Game as OF

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Siri • TBR 2.63
2. Robert • CHW 2.63
3. Taveras • TEX 2.60
4. Rodríguez • SEA 2.58
5. Bleday • OAK 2.55

Fielding % as OF

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Judge • NYY 1.000
2. Meyers • HOU .997
3. Cowser • BAL .997
4. Verdugo • NYY .997
5. Mullins • BAL .996

Range Factor/9Inn as P

<strong>Range Factor per 9 Inn</strong><br>9 * (Putouts + Assists) / Innings Played

1. Houck • BOS 2.57
2. Bello • BOS 2.00
3. Eovaldi • TEX 1.95
4. Lugo • KCR 1.87
5. Bibee • CLE 1.71

Range Factor/Game as P

<strong>Range Factor per Game</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / Games Played

1. Houck • BOS 1.70
2. Lugo • KCR 1.30
3. Eovaldi • TEX 1.28
4. Bello • BOS 1.20
5. Bibee • CLE 1.06

Fielding % as P

<strong>Fielding Percentage</strong><br>(Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors)

1. Houck • BOS 1.000
Kikuchi • 2TM 1.000
Eflin • 2TM 1.000
Wacha • KCR 1.000
Rodón • NYY 1.000
Ragans • KCR 1.000
Lugo • KCR 1.000
Crawford • BOS 1.000
Cortés • NYY 1.000
Canning • LAA 1.000

A ** by the stat's value indicates the player had fewer than the required number of at bats or plate appearances for the BA, OBP, SLG or OPS title that year. In order to rank the player, the necessary number of hitless at bats were added to the player's season total. The value printed here is their actual value and not the value used to rank them, therefore some numbers may appear out of order.

For rate stats, generally a minimum of 3.1 Plate Appearances/Team Game (batting), 1.0 IP/Team Game (pitching), 0.67 Gm and Chances/Team Game (fielding), 0.2 SB att/Team Game (catchers), 0.1 SB att/Team Game (baserunners only since 1951), and 0.1 decision/Team Game (W-L%) is needed for single-season leaderboards. For pitcher fielding the minimums are reduced by a third. For LF, CF, RF fielding stats, we only have reliable data since 1898, so all leaders are since 1898. Explanation of min. requirements