Rankings of Negro League players should consider that Negro League data is not complete. Research is still ongoing and we’ll continue to publish updates as more information becomes available. Negro Leagues Data: Frequently Asked Questions

Negro National League II Pitching Leaders

Wins Above Replacement--all

<strong>Wins Above Replacement</strong><br>A single number that presents the number of wins the player added<br>to the team above what a replacement player (think AAA or AAAA) would add.<br>Scale for a single-season: 8+ MVP Quality, 5+ All-Star Quality, 2+ Starter,<br>0-2 Reserve, < 0 Replacement Level <br>Developed by Sean Smith of BaseballProjection.com

1. ManningNE 3.3
2. ByrdBEG 3.2
3. BlackBEG 3.2
4. GilliamBEG 3.1
5. LockettBEG 3.0
6. AustinPS 3.0
7. KimbroBEG 2.8
8. ScantleburyNYC 2.8
9. RicksPS 2.4
10. EasterHG 2.2

WAR for Pitchers

<strong>Wins Above Replacement for Pitchers</strong><br>A single number that presents the number of wins the player added<br>to the team above what a replacement player (think AAA or AAAA) would add. This value includes defensive support and includes additional value for high leverage situations.<br>Scale: 8+ MVP Quality, 5+ All-Star Quality, 2+ Starter,<br>0-2 Reserve, < 0 Replacement Level <br> Developed by Sean Smith of BaseballProjection.com

1. ManningNE 3.2
2. BlackBEG 2.9
3. ByrdBEG 2.5
4. RicksPS 2.3
5. LewisNE 2.1
6. ScantleburyNYC 1.8
7. MillerPS 1.7
8. BarnhillNYC 1.6
9. HookerNE 1.5
10. RombyBEG 1.5

Earned Run Average

<strong>9 * ER / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played.<br>Bold indicates lowest ERA using current stats<br><span class=glimmer>Gold</span> means awarded ERA title at end of year.

1. RicksPS 1.73
2. ManningNE 1.75
3. LewisNE 1.86
4. ByrdBEG 1.90
5. BlackBEG 1.99
6. RombyBEG 2.22
7. BrownPS 2.54
8. GainesBEG 3.02
9. ParkerHG 3.03
10. BarnhillNYC 3.06

Wins

Wins

1. ByrdBEG 10
2. ManningNE 9
3. BlackBEG 8
4. ScantleburyNYC 7
MillerPS 7
McHenryPS 7
GainesBEG 7
8. RombyBEG 6
RicksPS 6
ParkerHG 6
FieldsHG 6
HookerNE 6

Win-Loss %

<strong>Win-Loss Percentage</strong><br>W / (W + L)<br>For players, leaders need one decision for every ten team games.<br>For managers, minimum to qualify for leading is 320 games.

1. RicksPS 1.000
2. FieldsHG .857
3. ParkerHG .750
GriffithNBY .750
5. BlackBEG .727
6. ByrdBEG .714
7. GainesBEG .700
8. ManningNE .692
9. RombyBEG .600
10. ScantleburyNYC .583

Walks & Hits per IP

<strong>(BB + H)/IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. ByrdBEG 1.022
2. BlackBEG 1.041
3. HookerNE 1.087
4. ManningNE 1.112
5. LewisNE 1.112
6. RombyBEG 1.180
7. GainesBEG 1.200
8. ParkerHG 1.211
9. FieldsHG 1.214
10. WalkerHG 1.230

Hits per 9 IP

<strong>9 x H / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. RombyBEG 6.472
2. BlackBEG 6.512
3. LewisNE 6.517
4. ParkerHG 6.659
5. ManningNE 6.988
6. RicksPS 7.442
7. WalkerHG 7.525
8. ByrdBEG 7.589
9. GoldenNE 7.875
10. GainesBEG 7.992

Bases On Balls per 9 IP

<strong>9 x BB / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. ScantleburyNYC 1.543
2. ByrdBEG 1.605
3. HookerNE 1.630
4. BurkeBEG 1.645
5. FieldsHG 1.929
6. PartlowPS 1.938
7. McHenryPS 2.414
8. BrownPS 2.541
9. GainesBEG 2.808
10. BlackBEG 2.859

Strikeouts per 9 IP

<strong>9 x SO / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. BrownPS 6.988
2. RombyBEG 6.876
3. BlackBEG 6.750
4. GainesBEG 6.372
5. ManningNE 5.797
6. ByrdBEG 5.765
7. LewisNE 5.703
8. McHenryPS 5.632
9. ThurmanHG 5.617
10. MillerPS 5.481

Games Played

Games Played or Pitched

1. MillerPS 18
2. BlackBEG 17
ByrdBEG 17
4. McHenryPS 16
RombyBEG 16
ScantleburyNYC 16
7. WilliamsNE 15
ManningNE 15
GoldenNE 15
10. HookerNE 14

Saves

Saves

1. RombyBEG 3
ThompsonHG 3
3. GoldenNE 2
4. AlexanderHG 1
BarnhillNYC 1
BlackBEG 1
FerrellBEG 1
LewisNE 1
RicksPS 1
StanleyNBY 1
TriceHG 1
WilliamsNE 1
WilmoreBEG 1

Innings Pitched

Innings Pitched

1. ByrdBEG 123.1
2. ScantleburyNYC 116.2
3. BlackBEG 113.1
ManningNE 113.1
5. MillerPS 111.2
6. McHenryPS 100.2
7. RombyBEG 89.0
8. HookerNE 88.1
9. BarnhillNYC 85.1
10. GainesBEG 83.1

Strikeouts

Strikeouts

1. BlackBEG 85
2. ByrdBEG 79
3. ManningNE 73
4. MillerPS 68
RombyBEG 68
6. McHenryPS 63
ScantleburyNYC 63
8. GainesBEG 59
9. BarnhillNYC 50
10. LewisNE 49

Games Started

Games Started

1. ManningNE 14
MillerPS 14
3. ScantleburyNYC 13
4. BarnhillNYC 12
BlackBEG 12
McHenryPS 12
ByrdBEG 12
8. HookerNE 11
GainesBEG 11
10. RombyBEG 10

Complete Games

Complete Game

1. ManningNE 12
2. ByrdBEG 11
3. McHenryPS 10
4. ScantleburyNYC 9
5. BarnhillNYC 8
BlackBEG 8
HookerNE 8
8. RombyBEG 7
MillerPS 7
10. ParkerHG 6
ThurmanHG 6
GainesBEG 6

Shutouts

Shutouts<br>No runs allowed and a complete game.

1. LewisNE 3
2. BlackBEG 2
GoldenNE 2
4. BarnhillNYC 1
BurkeBEG 1
FieldsHG 1
GriffithNBY 1
ManningNE 1
McHenryPS 1
MillerPS 1
RicksPS 1
RombyBEG 1
ScantleburyNYC 1
ThurmanHG 1

Home Runs

Home Runs Hit/Allowed

1. BarnhillNYC 7
2. ScantleburyNYC 6
MillerPS 6
4. McHenryPS 5
5. LópezNYC 3
SmithNBY 3
ParkerHG 3
GriffithNBY 3
GoldenNE 3
BlackBEG 3
BrownPS 3
DavidsonNBY 3

Bases on Balls

Bases on Balls/Walks

1. MillerPS 51
2. RombyBEG 41
3. ManningNE 38
4. BlackBEG 36
5. ParkerHG 35
6. LópezNYC 32
7. GoldenNE 31
8. BarnhillNYC 30
LewisNE 30
10. WilliamsNE 29

Hits

Hits/Hits Allowed

1. ScantleburyNYC 126
2. McHenryPS 116
3. MillerPS 108
4. ByrdBEG 104
5. ManningNE 88
6. BarnhillNYC 87
7. WilliamsNE 84
8. BlackBEG 82
9. HookerNE 80
10. BurkeBEG 78

Strikeouts / Base On Balls

<strong>SO/W or SO/BB</strong><br>For recent years, pitching leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played.<br>No batting leaders computed.

1. ByrdBEG 3.591
2. ScantleburyNYC 3.150
3. BrownPS 2.750
4. HookerNE 2.563
5. BlackBEG 2.361
6. PartlowPS 2.357
7. McHenryPS 2.333
8. GainesBEG 2.269
9. FieldsHG 2.167
10. ManningNE 1.921

Home Runs per 9 IP

<strong>9 x HR / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. WalkerHG 0.000
BurkeBEG 0.000
RicksPS 0.000
ManningNE 0.000
5. RombyBEG 0.101
6. GainesBEG 0.108
7. LewisNE 0.116
8. WilliamsNE 0.125
9. ByrdBEG 0.146
10. ThurmanHG 0.181

Losses

Losses

1. BarnhillNYC 7
WilliamsNE 7
3. MillerPS 6
McHenryPS 6
LewisNE 6
6. HookerNE 5
BrownPS 5
ScantleburyNYC 5
LópezNYC 5
10. ManningNE 4
GoldenNE 4
StephensNBY 4
ThompsonHG 4
ThurmanHG 4
ByrdBEG 4
RombyBEG 4

Earned Runs

Earned Runs Allowed

1. MillerPS 50
2. McHenryPS 46
3. ScantleburyNYC 40
4. WilliamsNE 38
5. HookerNE 32
6. LópezNYC 31
7. GoldenNE 30
8. ThurmanHG 29
BarnhillNYC 29
10. GainesBEG 28

Wild Pitches

Wild Pitches

1. BarnhillNYC 4
2. BrownPS 2
BurkeBEG 2
EvansHG 2
WilliamsNE 2
LewisNE 2
ScantleburyNYC 2
ManningNE 2
McHenryPS 2
MillerPS 2
RicksPS 2

Hit By Pitch

Times Hit by a Pitch.

1. WilliamsNE 4
2. LópezNYC 3
StanleyNBY 3
SmithNBY 3
HookerNE 3
6. DavidsonNBY 2
ThompsonHG 2
StephensNBY 2
BurkeBEG 2
RombyBEG 2
RicksPS 2
PartlowPS 2
MillerPS 2
McHenryPS 2
ManningNE 2
JenkinsNYC 2
EvansHG 2
LewisNE 2

Batters Faced

Batters Faced

1. ScantleburyNYC 492
2. ByrdBEG 487
3. MillerPS 484
4. ManningNE 468
5. BlackBEG 446
6. McHenryPS 436
7. BarnhillNYC 374
8. RombyBEG 364
HookerNE 364
10. GainesBEG 348

Games Finished

Games Finished<br>Credited to the last pitcher to appear for a team in a game.<br>Complete Games are not counted as Games Finished.

1. WilliamsNE 6
GoldenNE 6
RombyBEG 6
4. JenkinsNYC 5
LópezNYC 5
ByrdBEG 5
BrownPS 5
8. BlackBEG 4
MillerPS 4
BellHG 4
GriffithNBY 4

Adjusted ERA+

<strong>ERA+</strong><br>100*[lgERA/ERA]<br>Adjusted to the player&#x2019;s ballpark(s).

1. RicksPS 207
2. ManningNE 204
3. LewisNE 192
4. ByrdBEG 188
5. BlackBEG 179
6. RombyBEG 160
7. BrownPS 141
8. GainesBEG 118
9. ParkerHG 118
10. BarnhillNYC 117

Fielding Independent Pitching

<strong>Fielding Independent Pitching</strong><br>this stat measures a pitcher's effectiveness at preventing HR, BB, HBP and causing SO<br><tt>(13*HR + 3*(BB+HBP) - 2*SO)/IP + Constant<sub>lg</sub></tt><br>The constant is set so that each season major-league average FIP is the same as the major-league avg ERA

1. ByrdBEG 2.26
2. GainesBEG 2.49
3. ManningNE 2.54
4. BlackBEG 2.60
5. HookerNE 2.79
6. BurkeBEG 2.80
7. BrownPS 2.81
8. RombyBEG 2.84
9. ScantleburyNYC 2.88
10. PartlowPS 2.90

Adj. Pitching Runs

<strong>Adjusted Pitching Runs</strong><br>A set of formulas developed by Gary Gillette, Pete Palmer and others<br>that estimates a pitcher&#x2019;s total contributions<br>to a team&#x2019;s runs total via linear weights.<br>0.0 is an avg performance, <0 is worse than avg and >0 is better than avg

1. ByrdBEG 20
2. BlackBEG 20
3. ManningNE 20
4. LewisNE 13
5. RombyBEG 12
6. RicksPS 11
7. BrownPS 5
8. GainesBEG 5
9. ParkerHG 5
10. HookerNE 5

Adj. Pitching Wins

<strong>Adjusted Pitching Wins</strong><br>A set of formulas developed by Gary Gillette, Pete Palmer and others<br>that estimates a pitcher&#x2019;s total contributions<br>to a team&#x2019;s wins with his arm.<br>0.0 is an avg performance, <0 is worse than avg and >0 is better than avg

1. ByrdBEG 2.2
2. BlackBEG 2.1
3. ManningNE 2.1
4. LewisNE 1.3
5. RombyBEG 1.2
6. RicksPS 1.1
7. BrownPS 0.5
8. GainesBEG 0.5
9. ParkerHG 0.5
10. HookerNE 0.5

More 1948 Negro National League II Pages