National League Pitching Leaders

Wins Above Replacement--all

<strong>Wins Above Replacement</strong><br>A single number that presents the number of wins the player added<br>to the team above what a replacement player (think AAA or AAAA) would add.<br>Scale for a single-season: 8+ MVP Quality, 5+ All-Star Quality, 2+ Starter,<br>0-2 Reserve, < 0 Replacement Level <br>Developed by Sean Smith of BaseballProjection.com

1. DevlinLOU 18.3
2. BondHAR 10.4
3. SpaldingCHC 10.2
4. BradleySTL 9.1
5. BarnesCHC 5.7
6. AnsonCHC 3.7
7. WhiteCHC 3.7
8. CummingsHAR 3.5
9. McVeyCHC 3.5
10. BattinSTL 3.5

WAR for Pitchers

<strong>Wins Above Replacement for Pitchers</strong><br>A single number that presents the number of wins the player added<br>to the team above what a replacement player (think AAA or AAAA) would add. This value includes defensive support and includes additional value for high leverage situations.<br>Scale: 8+ MVP Quality, 5+ All-Star Quality, 2+ Starter,<br>0-2 Reserve, < 0 Replacement Level <br> Developed by Sean Smith of BaseballProjection.com

1. DevlinLOU 17.7
2. BondHAR 10.4
3. SpaldingCHC 9.4
4. BradleySTL 8.8
5. CummingsHAR 4.3
6. MathewsNYU 3.3
7. McVeyCHC 1.4
8. LaffertyATH 0.4
9. BradleyBSN 0.4
10. BlongSTL 0.2

Earned Run Average

<strong>9 * ER / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played.<br>Bold indicates lowest ERA using current stats<br><span class=glimmer>Gold</span> means awarded ERA title at end of year.

1. BradleySTL 1.23
2. DevlinLOU 1.56
3. CummingsHAR 1.67
4. BondHAR 1.68
5. SpaldingCHC 1.75
6. ManningBSN 2.14
7. BradleyBSN 2.49
8. KnightATH 2.62
9. MathewsNYU 2.86
10. BordenBSN 2.89

Wins

Wins

1. SpaldingCHC 47
2. BradleySTL 45
3. BondHAR 31
4. DevlinLOU 30
5. MathewsNYU 21
6. ManningBSN 18
7. CummingsHAR 16
8. BordenBSN 11
9. KnightATH 10
10. BradleyBSN 9

Win-Loss %

<strong>Win-Loss Percentage</strong><br>W / (W + L)<br>For players, leaders need one decision for every ten team games.<br>For managers, minimum to qualify for leading is 320 games.

1. SpaldingCHC .797
2. ManningBSN .783
3. McVeyCHC .714
4. BondHAR .705
5. BradleySTL .703
6. CummingsHAR .667
7. BordenBSN .478
8. BradleyBSN .474
9. DevlinLOU .462
10. MathewsNYU .382

Walks & Hits per IP

<strong>(BB + H)/IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. BradleySTL 0.887
2. BondHAR 0.902
3. DevlinLOU 0.969
4. CummingsHAR 1.060
5. SpaldingCHC 1.074
6. ManningBSN 1.242
7. BradleyBSN 1.252
8. FisherCIN 1.308
9. MathewsNYU 1.390
10. BordenBSN 1.411

Hits per 9 IP

<strong>9 x H / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. BradleySTL 7.382
2. BondHAR 7.831
3. DevlinLOU 8.190
4. CummingsHAR 8.958
5. SpaldingCHC 9.227
6. ManningBSN 9.715
7. BradleyBSN 10.437
8. BordenBSN 10.594
9. FisherCIN 11.538
10. MathewsNYU 12.087

Bases On Balls per 9 IP

<strong>9 x BB / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. ZettleinATH 0.231
2. FisherCIN 0.235
3. BondHAR 0.287
4. MathewsNYU 0.419
5. WilliamsCIN 0.434
6. SpaldingCHC 0.443
7. DevlinLOU 0.535
8. CummingsHAR 0.583
9. BradleySTL 0.597
10. DeanCIN 0.822

Strikeouts per 9 IP

<strong>9 x SO / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. BondHAR 1.941
2. DevlinLOU 1.765
3. BradleySTL 1.618
4. BordenBSN 1.402
5. FisherCIN 1.138
6. ManningBSN 1.095
7. CummingsHAR 1.083
8. WilliamsCIN 0.976
9. BradleyBSN 0.831
10. DeanCIN 0.754

Games Played

Games Played or Pitched

1. DevlinLOU 68
2. BradleySTL 64
3. SpaldingCHC 61
4. MathewsNYU 56
5. BondHAR 45
6. KnightATH 34
ManningBSN 34
8. DeanCIN 30
9. BordenBSN 29
10. ZettleinATH 28
FisherCIN 28

Saves

Saves

1. ManningBSN 5
2. ZettleinATH 2
McVeyCHC 2
4. BordenBSN 1
BradleyBSN 1
PetersCHC 1
WhiteCHC 1

Innings Pitched

Innings Pitched

1. DevlinLOU 622.0
2. BradleySTL 573.0
3. SpaldingCHC 528.2
4. MathewsNYU 516.0
5. BondHAR 408.0
6. KnightATH 282.0
7. DeanCIN 262.2
8. ZettleinATH 234.0
9. FisherCIN 229.1
10. BordenBSN 218.1

Strikeouts

Strikeouts

1. DevlinLOU 122
2. BradleySTL 103
3. BondHAR 88
4. SpaldingCHC 39
5. MathewsNYU 37
6. BordenBSN 34
7. FisherCIN 29
8. CummingsHAR 26
9. ManningBSN 24
10. DeanCIN 22

Games Started

Games Started

1. DevlinLOU 68
2. BradleySTL 64
3. SpaldingCHC 60
4. MathewsNYU 56
5. BondHAR 45
6. KnightATH 32
7. DeanCIN 30
8. ZettleinATH 25
9. BordenBSN 24
FisherCIN 24
CummingsHAR 24

Complete Games

Complete Game

1. DevlinLOU 66
2. BradleySTL 63
3. MathewsNYU 55
4. SpaldingCHC 53
5. BondHAR 45
6. KnightATH 27
7. DeanCIN 26
8. CummingsHAR 24
9. ZettleinATH 23
10. FisherCIN 22

Shutouts

Shutouts<br>No runs allowed and a complete game.

1. BradleySTL 16
2. SpaldingCHC 8
3. BondHAR 6
4. CummingsHAR 5
DevlinLOU 5
6. BordenBSN 2
MathewsNYU 2
8. ZettleinATH 1
BradleyBSN 1

Home Runs

Home Runs Hit/Allowed

1. MathewsNYU 8
2. SpaldingCHC 6
FisherCIN 6
4. BordenBSN 4
5. DevlinLOU 3
BradleySTL 3
7. ZettleinATH 2
BondHAR 2
9. BradleyBSN 1
ManningBSN 1
McBrideBSN 1
DeanCIN 1
PiersonCIN 1
WilliamsCIN 1

Bases on Balls

Bases on Balls/Walks

1. BordenBSN 51
2. BradleySTL 38
3. DevlinLOU 37
4. KnightATH 34
5. ManningBSN 32
6. SpaldingCHC 26
7. DeanCIN 24
MathewsNYU 24
9. BradleyBSN 16
10. CummingsHAR 14

Hits

Hits/Hits Allowed

1. MathewsNYU 693
2. DevlinLOU 566
3. SpaldingCHC 542
4. BradleySTL 470
5. DeanCIN 397
6. KnightATH 383
7. ZettleinATH 358
8. BondHAR 355
9. FisherCIN 294
10. BordenBSN 257

Strikeouts / Base On Balls

<strong>SO/W or SO/BB</strong><br>For recent years, pitching leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played.<br>No batting leaders computed.

1. BondHAR 6.769
2. FisherCIN 4.833
3. DevlinLOU 3.297
4. BradleySTL 2.711
5. WilliamsCIN 2.250
6. CummingsHAR 1.857
7. ZettleinATH 1.667
8. MathewsNYU 1.542
9. SpaldingCHC 1.500
10. BradleyBSN 1.000

Home Runs per 9 IP

<strong>9 x HR / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. KnightATH 0.000
CummingsHAR 0.000
3. DeanCIN 0.034
4. DevlinLOU 0.043
5. BondHAR 0.044
6. ManningBSN 0.046
7. BradleySTL 0.047
8. BradleyBSN 0.052
9. ZettleinATH 0.077
10. SpaldingCHC 0.102

Losses

Losses

1. DevlinLOU 35
2. MathewsNYU 34
3. DeanCIN 26
4. KnightATH 22
5. ZettleinATH 20
FisherCIN 20
7. BradleySTL 19
8. BondHAR 13
9. SpaldingCHC 12
BordenBSN 12

Earned Runs

Earned Runs Allowed

1. MathewsNYU 164
2. DeanCIN 109
3. DevlinLOU 108
4. SpaldingCHC 103
5. ZettleinATH 101
6. KnightATH 82
7. BradleySTL 78
8. FisherCIN 77
9. BondHAR 76
10. BordenBSN 70

Wild Pitches

Wild Pitches

1. BradleySTL 34
2. KnightATH 23
3. BordenBSN 21
4. DeanCIN 17
5. ManningBSN 16
6. DevlinLOU 14
7. BondHAR 8
8. BradleyBSN 7
RyanLOU 7
CummingsHAR 7

Batters Faced

Batters Faced

1. DevlinLOU 2,568
2. MathewsNYU 2,327
3. BradleySTL 2,269
4. SpaldingCHC 2,219
5. BondHAR 1,623
6. KnightATH 1,324
7. DeanCIN 1,257
8. ZettleinATH 1,089
9. FisherCIN 1,039
10. BordenBSN 983

Games Finished

Games Finished<br>Credited to the last pitcher to appear for a team in a game.<br>Complete Games are not counted as Games Finished.

1. ManningBSN 13
2. BordenBSN 6
3. ZettleinATH 4
McVeyCHC 4
FisherCIN 4
6. SpaldingCHC 2
CoonATH 2
8. KnightATH 1
BradleyBSN 1
WrightBSN 1
PetersCHC 1
BoothCIN 1
ClackCIN 1
DeanCIN 1
GouldCIN 1
PearceLOU 1
RyanLOU 1
BoothNYU 1
BlongSTL 1
WhiteCHC 1

Adjusted ERA+

<strong>ERA+</strong><br>100*[lgERA/ERA]<br>Adjusted to the player&#x2019;s ballpark(s).

1. BradleySTL 170
2. DevlinLOU 168
3. CummingsHAR 144
4. BondHAR 143
5. SpaldingCHC 137
6. ManningBSN 104
7. KnightATH 90
8. BradleyBSN 89
9. MathewsNYU 79
10. BordenBSN 77

Fielding Independent Pitching

<strong>Fielding Independent Pitching</strong><br>this stat measures a pitcher's effectiveness at preventing HR, BB, HBP and causing SO<br><tt>(13*HR + 3*(BB+HBP) - 2*SO)/IP + Constant<sub>lg</sub></tt><br>The constant is set so that each season major-league average FIP is the same as the major-league avg ERA

1. BondHAR 1.96
2. DevlinLOU 2.08
3. BradleySTL 2.14
4. CummingsHAR 2.19
5. WilliamsCIN 2.32
6. ZettleinATH 2.34
7. SpaldingCHC 2.38
8. DeanCIN 2.39
9. FisherCIN 2.40
10. BradleyBSN 2.40

Adj. Pitching Runs

<strong>Adjusted Pitching Runs</strong><br>A set of formulas developed by Gary Gillette, Pete Palmer and others<br>that estimates a pitcher&#x2019;s total contributions<br>to a team&#x2019;s runs total via linear weights.<br>0.0 is an avg performance, <0 is worse than avg and >0 is better than avg

1. DevlinLOU 59
2. BradleySTL 53
3. SpaldingCHC 43
4. BondHAR 37
5. CummingsHAR 18
6. McVeyCHC 6
7. LaffertyATH 2
8. BlongSTL 1
9. NicholsBSN 1
10. WhiteCHC 1

Adj. Pitching Wins

<strong>Adjusted Pitching Wins</strong><br>A set of formulas developed by Gary Gillette, Pete Palmer and others<br>that estimates a pitcher&#x2019;s total contributions<br>to a team&#x2019;s wins with his arm.<br>0.0 is an avg performance, <0 is worse than avg and >0 is better than avg

1. DevlinLOU 5.4
2. BradleySTL 4.9
3. SpaldingCHC 3.9
4. BondHAR 3.4
5. CummingsHAR 1.6
6. McVeyCHC 0.6
7. LaffertyATH 0.2
8. BlongSTL 0.1
9. NicholsBSN 0.1
10. WhiteCHC 0.1

More 1876 National League Pages

1876 NL Season

Standings

Schedule

Fielding

Batting

Pitching

Managers

Fielding

Batting

Pitching

  • Standard Pitching
  • Value
  • Advanced Pitching
  • Win Probability
  • Spring Training
  • Pitching Ratios
  • Baserunning/Situ
  • Starting Pitching
  • Relief Pitching
  • Pitching Pitches
  • Batting Against
  • Cumulative Pitching
  • Neutralized Pitching
  • League Splits
  • Minors Pitching

Leaders & Awards

Other