National Association Pitching Leaders

Wins Above Replacement--all

<strong>Wins Above Replacement</strong><br>A single number that presents the number of wins the player added<br>to the team above what a replacement player (think AAA or AAAA) would add.<br>Scale for a single-season: 8+ MVP Quality, 5+ All-Star Quality, 2+ Starter,<br>0-2 Reserve, < 0 Replacement Level <br>Developed by Sean Smith of BaseballProjection.com

1. MathewsNYU 13.7
2. SpaldingBOS 10.6
3. McBrideATH 6.3
CummingsPHI 6.3
5. FisherHAR 4.2
6. McVeyBOS 3.0
7. ZettleinCHI 3.0
8. WrightBOS 2.7
9. PearceBRA 2.5
10. PikeHAR 2.4

WAR for Pitchers

<strong>Wins Above Replacement for Pitchers</strong><br>A single number that presents the number of wins the player added<br>to the team above what a replacement player (think AAA or AAAA) would add. This value includes defensive support and includes additional value for high leverage situations.<br>Scale: 8+ MVP Quality, 5+ All-Star Quality, 2+ Starter,<br>0-2 Reserve, < 0 Replacement Level <br> Developed by Sean Smith of BaseballProjection.com

1. MathewsNYU 13.6
2. SpaldingBOS 8.9
3. McBrideATH 6.8
4. CummingsPHI 6.7
5. FisherHAR 5.0
6. ZettleinCHI 3.7
7. Manning2TM 1.1
8. BondBRA 0.4
9. HatfieldNYU 0.1
10. WrightBOS 0.1

Earned Run Average

<strong>9 * ER / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played.<br>Bold indicates lowest ERA using current stats<br><span class=glimmer>Gold</span> means awarded ERA title at end of year.

1. McBrideATH 1.64
2. MathewsNYU 1.90
3. SpaldingBOS 1.92
4. CummingsPHI 1.96
5. BondBRA 2.03
6. Manning2TM 2.09
7. FisherHAR 2.32
8. ZettleinCHI 2.43
9. StearnsHAR 2.95
10. BrainardBAL 3.71

Wins

Wins

1. SpaldingBOS 52
2. MathewsNYU 42
3. McBrideATH 33
4. CummingsPHI 28
5. ZettleinCHI 27
6. BondBRA 22
7. FisherHAR 13
8. BrainardBAL 5
9. Manning2TM 4
10. StearnsHAR 3

Win-Loss %

<strong>Win-Loss Percentage</strong><br>W / (W + L)<br>For players, leaders need one decision for every ten team games.<br>For managers, minimum to qualify for leading is 320 games.

1. SpaldingBOS .765
2. MathewsNYU .656
3. McBrideATH .600
4. CummingsPHI .519
5. ZettleinCHI .474
6. BondBRA .407
7. FisherHAR .361
8. Manning2TM .200
9. BrainardBAL .185
10. StearnsHAR .176

Walks & Hits per IP

<strong>(BB + H)/IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. McBrideATH 1.121
2. MathewsNYU 1.199
3. BondBRA 1.235
4. SpaldingBOS 1.254
5. CummingsPHI 1.313
6. ZettleinCHI 1.324
7. Manning2TM 1.325
8. FisherHAR 1.331
9. StearnsHAR 1.588
10. BrainardBAL 1.800

Hits per 9 IP

<strong>9 x H / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. McBrideATH 9.499
2. MathewsNYU 10.152
3. BondBRA 10.974
4. SpaldingBOS 11.007
5. ZettleinCHI 11.170
6. Manning2TM 11.309
7. CummingsPHI 11.478
8. FisherHAR 11.615
9. StearnsHAR 13.443
10. BrainardBAL 15.188

Bases On Balls per 9 IP

<strong>9 x BB / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. BondBRA 0.145
2. SpaldingBOS 0.277
3. CummingsPHI 0.335
4. FisherHAR 0.363
5. McBrideATH 0.591
6. Manning2TM 0.611
7. MathewsNYU 0.638
8. ZettleinCHI 0.750
9. StearnsHAR 0.851
10. BrainardBAL 1.013

Strikeouts per 9 IP

<strong>9 x SO / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. MathewsNYU 1.573
2. CummingsPHI 1.137
3. StearnsHAR 0.794
4. BondBRA 0.761
5. FisherHAR 0.698
6. McBrideATH 0.684
7. Manning2TM 0.611
8. ZettleinCHI 0.454
9. SpaldingBOS 0.452
10. BrainardBAL 0.300

Games Played

Games Played or Pitched

1. SpaldingBOS 71
2. MathewsNYU 65
3. ZettleinCHI 57
4. BondBRA 55
McBrideATH 55
6. CummingsPHI 54
7. FisherHAR 39
8. BrainardBAL 30
9. Manning2TM 22
StearnsHAR 22

Saves

Saves

1. WrightBOS 3

Innings Pitched

Innings Pitched

1. SpaldingBOS 617.1
2. MathewsNYU 578.0
3. ZettleinCHI 515.2
4. BondBRA 497.0
5. McBrideATH 487.0
6. CummingsPHI 483.0
7. FisherHAR 322.1
8. BrainardBAL 240.0
9. Manning2TM 176.2
10. StearnsHAR 158.2

Strikeouts

Strikeouts

1. MathewsNYU 101
2. CummingsPHI 61
3. BondBRA 42
4. McBrideATH 37
5. SpaldingBOS 31
6. ZettleinCHI 26
7. FisherHAR 25
8. StearnsHAR 14
9. Manning2TM 12
10. BrainardBAL 8

Games Started

Games Started

1. SpaldingBOS 69
2. MathewsNYU 65
3. ZettleinCHI 57
4. BondBRA 55
McBrideATH 55
6. CummingsPHI 54
7. FisherHAR 35
8. BrainardBAL 27
9. Manning2TM 20
10. StearnsHAR 18

Complete Games

Complete Game

1. SpaldingBOS 65
2. MathewsNYU 62
3. ZettleinCHI 57
4. BondBRA 55
McBrideATH 55
6. CummingsPHI 52
7. FisherHAR 31
8. BrainardBAL 25
9. Manning2TM 17
10. StearnsHAR 14

Shutouts

Shutouts<br>No runs allowed and a complete game.

1. MathewsNYU 4
SpaldingBOS 4
3. CummingsPHI 3
ZettleinCHI 3
5. BondBRA 1

Home Runs

Home Runs Hit/Allowed

1. BondBRA 15
2. McBrideATH 6
3. CummingsPHI 4
ForceCHI 4
5. MathewsNYU 3
ZettleinCHI 3
7. Manning2TM 2
8. BrainardBAL 1
FisherHAR 1
SpaldingBOS 1

Bases on Balls

Bases on Balls/Walks

1. ZettleinCHI 43
2. MathewsNYU 41
3. McBrideATH 32
4. BrainardBAL 27
5. SpaldingBOS 19
6. CummingsPHI 18
7. StearnsHAR 15
8. FisherHAR 13
9. Manning2TM 12
10. BondBRA 8

Hits

Hits/Hits Allowed

1. SpaldingBOS 755
2. MathewsNYU 652
3. ZettleinCHI 640
4. CummingsPHI 616
5. BondBRA 606
6. McBrideATH 514
7. FisherHAR 416
8. BrainardBAL 405
9. StearnsHAR 237
10. Manning2TM 222

Strikeouts / Base On Balls

<strong>SO/W or SO/BB</strong><br>For recent years, pitching leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played.<br>No batting leaders computed.

1. BondBRA 5.250
2. CummingsPHI 3.389
3. MathewsNYU 2.463
4. FisherHAR 1.923
5. SpaldingBOS 1.632
6. McBrideATH 1.156
7. Manning2TM 1.000
8. StearnsHAR 0.933
9. ZettleinCHI 0.605
10. BrainardBAL 0.296

Home Runs per 9 IP

<strong>9 x HR / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. StearnsHAR 0.000
2. SpaldingBOS 0.015
3. FisherHAR 0.028
4. BrainardBAL 0.038
5. MathewsNYU 0.047
6. ZettleinCHI 0.052
7. CummingsPHI 0.075
8. Manning2TM 0.102
9. McBrideATH 0.111
10. BondBRA 0.272

Losses

Losses

1. BondBRA 32
2. ZettleinCHI 30
3. CummingsPHI 26
4. FisherHAR 23
5. BrainardBAL 22
MathewsNYU 22
McBrideATH 22
8. SpaldingBOS 16
Manning2TM 16
10. StearnsHAR 14

Earned Runs

Earned Runs Allowed

1. ZettleinCHI 139
2. SpaldingBOS 132
3. MathewsNYU 122
4. BondBRA 112
5. CummingsPHI 105
6. BrainardBAL 99
7. McBrideATH 89
8. FisherHAR 83
9. StearnsHAR 52
10. Manning2TM 41

Wild Pitches

Wild Pitches

1. MathewsNYU 32
2. BrainardBAL 19
3. SpaldingBOS 18
4. FisherHAR 16
5. CollinsCHI 12
6. McBrideATH 9
7. BondBRA 6
ZettleinCHI 6
9. CummingsPHI 3
StearnsHAR 3

Batters Faced

Batters Faced

1. SpaldingBOS 2,784
2. MathewsNYU 2,543
3. ZettleinCHI 2,385
4. BondBRA 2,288
5. CummingsPHI 2,246
6. McBrideATH 2,171
7. FisherHAR 1,513
8. BrainardBAL 1,267
9. Manning2TM 846
10. StearnsHAR 813

Games Finished

Games Finished<br>Credited to the last pitcher to appear for a team in a game.<br>Complete Games are not counted as Games Finished.

1. FisherHAR 5
2. BrainardBAL 4
WrightBOS 4
4. HatfieldNYU 3
StearnsHAR 3
6. SpaldingBOS 2
7. BechtelPHI 1
CummingsPHI 1
ForceCHI 1
Manning2TM 1

Adjusted ERA+

<strong>ERA+</strong><br>100*[lgERA/ERA]<br>Adjusted to the player&#x2019;s ballpark(s).

1. McBrideATH 139
2. MathewsNYU 117
3. CummingsPHI 112
4. SpaldingBOS 111
5. Manning2TM 109
6. BondBRA 101
7. FisherHAR 99
8. ZettleinCHI 90
9. StearnsHAR 78
10. BrainardBAL 61

Fielding Independent Pitching

<strong>Fielding Independent Pitching</strong><br>this stat measures a pitcher's effectiveness at preventing HR, BB, HBP and causing SO<br><tt>(13*HR + 3*(BB+HBP) - 2*SO)/IP + Constant<sub>lg</sub></tt><br>The constant is set so that each season major-league average FIP is the same as the major-league avg ERA

1. MathewsNYU 2.00
2. CummingsPHI 2.03
3. FisherHAR 2.07
4. SpaldingBOS 2.08
5. StearnsHAR 2.17
6. McBrideATH 2.27
7. Manning2TM 2.28
8. ZettleinCHI 2.29
9. BondBRA 2.34
10. BrainardBAL 2.39

Adj. Pitching Runs

<strong>Adjusted Pitching Runs</strong><br>A set of formulas developed by Gary Gillette, Pete Palmer and others<br>that estimates a pitcher&#x2019;s total contributions<br>to a team&#x2019;s runs total via linear weights.<br>0.0 is an avg performance, <0 is worse than avg and >0 is better than avg

1. McBrideATH 28
2. MathewsNYU 27
3. SpaldingBOS 22
4. CummingsPHI 9
5. HatfieldNYU 0
6. WrightBOS 0
7. BechtelPHI 0

Adj. Pitching Wins

<strong>Adjusted Pitching Wins</strong><br>A set of formulas developed by Gary Gillette, Pete Palmer and others<br>that estimates a pitcher&#x2019;s total contributions<br>to a team&#x2019;s wins with his arm.<br>0.0 is an avg performance, <0 is worse than avg and >0 is better than avg

1. McBrideATH 2.2
2. MathewsNYU 2.1
3. SpaldingBOS 1.7
4. CummingsPHI 0.7
5. HatfieldNYU 0.0
WrightBOS 0.0

More 1874 National Association Pages

1874 NA Season

Standings

Schedule

Fielding

Batting

Pitching

Managers

Fielding

Batting

Pitching

  • Standard Pitching
  • Value
  • Advanced Pitching
  • Win Probability
  • Spring Training
  • Pitching Ratios
  • Baserunning/Situ
  • Starting Pitching
  • Relief Pitching
  • Pitching Pitches
  • Batting Against
  • Cumulative Pitching
  • Neutralized Pitching
  • League Splits
  • Minors Pitching

Leaders & Awards

Other