Rankings of Negro League players should consider that Negro League data is not complete. Research is still ongoing and we’ll continue to publish updates as more information becomes available. Negro Leagues Data: Frequently Asked Questions

East-West League Pitching Leaders

Wins Above Replacement--all

<strong>Wins Above Replacement</strong><br>A single number that presents the number of wins the player added<br>to the team above what a replacement player (think AAA or AAAA) would add.<br>Scale for a single-season: 8+ MVP Quality, 5+ All-Star Quality, 2+ Starter,<br>0-2 Reserve, < 0 Replacement Level <br>Developed by Sean Smith of BaseballProjection.com

1. Hunter3TM 3.2
2. StrongHG 3.1
3. Harris3TM 2.3
4. HolmesBBS 2.2
LundyBBS 2.2
6. Charleston3TM 2.2
7. Suttles3TM 2.2
8. TiantCUP 2.1
9. Williams3TM 1.9
10. FlournoyBBS 1.9

WAR for Pitchers

<strong>Wins Above Replacement for Pitchers</strong><br>A single number that presents the number of wins the player added<br>to the team above what a replacement player (think AAA or AAAA) would add. This value includes defensive support and includes additional value for high leverage situations.<br>Scale: 8+ MVP Quality, 5+ All-Star Quality, 2+ Starter,<br>0-2 Reserve, < 0 Replacement Level <br> Developed by Sean Smith of BaseballProjection.com

1. Hunter2TM 3.2
2. Charleston2TM 2.2
3. TiantCUP 2.0
4. HolmesBBS 1.9
5. FlournoyBBS 1.8
6. StrongHG 1.8
7. Williams2TM 1.6
8. SalmonHG 1.6
9. McDuffie2TM 1.5
10. Matlock2TM 1.4

Earned Run Average

<strong>9 * ER / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played.<br>Bold indicates lowest ERA using current stats<br><span class=glimmer>Gold</span> means awarded ERA title at end of year.

1. Bell2TM 2.47
2. StrongHG 2.55
3. Williams2TM 2.72
4. Charleston2TM 2.74
5. TiantCUP 2.77
6. Hunter2TM 2.85
7. McDuffie2TM 2.87
8. SalmonHG 3.09
9. Davis2TM 3.25
10. CarterHIL 3.40

Wins

Wins

1. Hunter2TM 11
2. Williams2TM 7
Trent3TM 7
Brown2TM 7
TiantCUP 7
SalmonHG 7
7. AllenBBS 6
SmithBBS 6
HolmesBBS 6
10. Williams2TM 5
Matlock2TM 5
HayesWAP 5
McDonaldWAP 5
Charleston2TM 5
RichardsonWAP 5
StrongHG 5

Win-Loss %

<strong>Win-Loss Percentage</strong><br>W / (W + L)<br>For players, leaders need one decision for every ten team games.<br>For managers, minimum to qualify for leading is 320 games.

1. Williams2TM .875
2. Hunter2TM .846
3. Williams2TM .833
4. SalazarCUP .750
SmithBBS .750
6. TiantCUP .700
7. McDuffie2TM .667
Bell2TM .667
9. Matlock2TM .625
Charleston2TM .625

Walks & Hits per IP

<strong>(BB + H)/IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. BrewerWAP 1.085
2. Davis2TM 1.131
3. Bell2TM 1.157
4. Hunter2TM 1.160
5. Charleston2TM 1.161
6. StrongHG 1.189
7. McDuffie2TM 1.213
8. CarterHIL 1.267
9. Williams2TM 1.289
10. SalmonHG 1.311

Hits per 9 IP

<strong>9 x H / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. StrongHG 7.132
2. BrewerWAP 7.269
3. SmithBBS 7.714
4. Hunter2TM 7.831
5. Charleston2TM 7.839
6. McDuffie2TM 7.851
7. TiantCUP 7.905
8. Davis2TM 8.340
9. HolmesBBS 8.352
10. CarterHIL 8.400

Bases On Balls per 9 IP

<strong>9 x BB / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. McDonaldWAP 1.568
2. FlournoyBBS 1.800
3. Davis2TM 1.838
4. Bell2TM 1.941
5. Williams2TM 2.250
6. BrewerWAP 2.492
7. Hunter2TM 2.610
8. Charleston2TM 2.613
9. SalmonHG 2.771
10. Matlock2TM 2.796

Strikeouts per 9 IP

<strong>9 x SO / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. Hunter2TM 6.363
2. BrewerWAP 6.023
3. StrongHG 5.858
4. Davis2TM 5.796
5. Carter2TM 5.731
6. BrittHG 5.647
7. Trent3TM 5.493
8. HolmesBBS 5.328
9. TiantCUP 5.236
10. Matlock2TM 4.981

Games Played

Games Played or Pitched

1. HolmesBBS 19
2. Trent3TM 17
RichardsonWAP 17
4. McDonaldWAP 16
Matlock2TM 16
SalmonHG 16
Brown2TM 16
8. FlournoyBBS 15
Hunter2TM 15
10. Carter2TM 14
HayesWAP 14

Saves

Saves

1. BlakeBBS 1
BrownCUP 1
NeeleCUP 1
SalmonHG 1
Brown2TM 1
Carter2TM 1
Davis2TM 1
Hunter2TM 1

Innings Pitched

Innings Pitched

1. HolmesBBS 125.0
2. Brown2TM 115.1
3. SalmonHG 113.2
4. Hunter2TM 110.1
5. RichardsonWAP 107.0
6. McDonaldWAP 103.1
7. Matlock2TM 103.0
8. Trent3TM 96.2
9. FlournoyBBS 90.0
10. TiantCUP 87.2

Strikeouts

Strikeouts

1. Hunter2TM 78
2. HolmesBBS 74
3. Trent3TM 59
4. Matlock2TM 57
5. RichardsonWAP 53
6. Carter2TM 52
7. McDonaldWAP 51
Brown2TM 51
TiantCUP 51
10. SalmonHG 48

Games Started

Games Started

1. RichardsonWAP 14
2. McDonaldWAP 13
3. SalmonHG 12
TiantCUP 12
Brown2TM 12
6. FlournoyBBS 11
HolmesBBS 11
Hunter2TM 11
9. Carter2TM 10
Trent3TM 10

Complete Games

Complete Game

1. Hunter2TM 11
Brown2TM 11
RichardsonWAP 11
4. SalmonHG 10
5. Charleston2TM 8
TiantCUP 8
HolmesBBS 8
8. Carter2TM 7
StrongHG 7
FlournoyBBS 7
McDonaldWAP 7

Shutouts

Shutouts<br>No runs allowed and a complete game.

1. Trent3TM 3
2. AllenBBS 2
SalmonHG 2
4. BrewerWAP 1
CookeBBS 1
FlournoyBBS 1
HolmesBBS 1
McDonaldWAP 1
NeeleCUP 1
SalazarCUP 1
TiantCUP 1
Brown2TM 1
Charleston2TM 1
Hunter2TM 1
Williams2TM 1

Home Runs

Home Runs Hit/Allowed

1. HayesWAP 7
2. FlournoyBBS 6
3. Carter2TM 5
Brown2TM 5
WintersWAP 5
6. BrittHG 4
Matlock2TM 4
CookeBBS 4
WilliamsBBS 4
StrongHG 4
AllenBBS 4

Bases on Balls

Bases on Balls/Walks

1. HolmesBBS 53
2. Trent3TM 41
TiantCUP 41
4. RichardsonWAP 39
5. Brown2TM 38
6. Carter2TM 35
SalmonHG 35
8. Matlock2TM 32
Hunter2TM 32
SmithBBS 32

Hits

Hits/Hits Allowed

1. RichardsonWAP 140
2. McDonaldWAP 129
3. Brown2TM 119
4. HolmesBBS 116
5. SalmonHG 114
6. FlournoyBBS 111
7. Matlock2TM 105
8. Carter2TM 98
9. Trent3TM 97
10. Hunter2TM 96

Strikeouts / Base On Balls

<strong>SO/W or SO/BB</strong><br>For recent years, pitching leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played.<br>No batting leaders computed.

1. Davis2TM 3.154
2. McDonaldWAP 2.833
3. FlournoyBBS 2.556
4. Bell2TM 2.455
5. Hunter2TM 2.438
6. BrewerWAP 2.417
7. Matlock2TM 1.781
8. BrittHG 1.684
9. StrongHG 1.643
10. Carter2TM 1.486

Home Runs per 9 IP

<strong>9 x HR / IP</strong><br>For recent years, leaders need 1 IP<br>per team game played

1. BrewerWAP 0.000
Williams2TM 0.000
McDuffie2TM 0.000
Davis2TM 0.000
Bell2TM 0.000
6. Hunter2TM 0.082
7. TiantCUP 0.103
8. Charleston2TM 0.124
9. HolmesBBS 0.144
10. DeanCLS 0.144

Losses

Losses

1. Carter2TM 8
RichardsonWAP 8
3. Brown2TM 7
FlournoyBBS 7
5. AllenBBS 6
SalmonHG 6
HolmesBBS 6
HayesWAP 6
DeanCLS 6
BrownCUP 6

Earned Runs

Earned Runs Allowed

1. RichardsonWAP 72
2. Carter2TM 58
3. AllenBBS 51
4. HolmesBBS 48
5. Trent3TM 47
McDonaldWAP 47
Brown2TM 47
8. Matlock2TM 44
9. HayesWAP 40
10. SalmonHG 39

Wild Pitches

Wild Pitches

1. BrewerWAP 5
2. TiantCUP 3
3. HayesWAP 2
McDonaldWAP 2
WintersWAP 2
6. CarterHIL 1
CockrellHIL 1
FieldCLS 1
FlournoyBBS 1
RichardsonWAP 1
SalazarCUP 1
SmithBBS 1
SolderoCUP 1
Davis2TM 1
Eggleston2TM 1
Suttles2TM 1
AllenBBS 1
Williams2TM 1

Hit By Pitch

Times Hit by a Pitch.

1. McDonaldWAP 6
2. Trent3TM 5
3. Williams2TM 4
4. SmithBBS 3
Hunter2TM 3
Brown2TM 3
TiantCUP 3
8. BrewerWAP 2
Williams2TM 2
HayesWAP 2
HolmesBBS 2
JonesBBS 2
McDuffie2TM 2
Davis2TM 2
WilliamsBBS 2

Batters Faced

Batters Faced

1. HolmesBBS 527
2. Brown2TM 507
3. RichardsonWAP 503
4. SalmonHG 485
5. McDonaldWAP 451
6. Hunter2TM 445
7. Matlock2TM 436
8. Trent3TM 421
9. TiantCUP 380
10. FlournoyBBS 378

Games Finished

Games Finished<br>Credited to the last pitcher to appear for a team in a game.<br>Complete Games are not counted as Games Finished.

1. HolmesBBS 7
2. Matlock2TM 6
3. Trent3TM 5
4. SalmonHG 4
SmithBBS 4
Hunter2TM 4
Carter2TM 4
8. AllenBBS 3
McDonaldWAP 3
YokelyBBS 3
HayesWAP 3
Brown2TM 3
FlournoyBBS 3
DixonCUP 3
CookeBBS 3
BrewerWAP 3
Williams2TM 3

Adjusted ERA+

<strong>ERA+</strong><br>100*[lgERA/ERA]<br>Adjusted to the player&#x2019;s ballpark(s).

1. Bell2TM 174
2. StrongHG 167
3. Williams2TM 157
4. Charleston2TM 156
5. TiantCUP 154
6. McDuffie2TM 150
7. Hunter2TM 149
8. SalmonHG 138
9. Davis2TM 132
10. CarterHIL 126

Fielding Independent Pitching

<strong>Fielding Independent Pitching</strong><br>this stat measures a pitcher's effectiveness at preventing HR, BB, HBP and causing SO<br><tt>(13*HR + 3*(BB+HBP) - 2*SO)/IP + Constant<sub>lg</sub></tt><br>The constant is set so that each season major-league average FIP is the same as the major-league avg ERA

1. Davis2TM 2.54
2. BrewerWAP 2.75
3. Bell2TM 2.77
4. Hunter2TM 2.78
5. McDonaldWAP 3.08
6. Williams2TM 3.21
7. Charleston2TM 3.38
8. HolmesBBS 3.46
9. Matlock2TM 3.48
10. RichardsonWAP 3.49

Adj. Pitching Runs

<strong>Adjusted Pitching Runs</strong><br>A set of formulas developed by Gary Gillette, Pete Palmer and others<br>that estimates a pitcher&#x2019;s total contributions<br>to a team&#x2019;s runs total via linear weights.<br>0.0 is an avg performance, <0 is worse than avg and >0 is better than avg

1. Hunter2TM 19
2. StrongHG 13
3. TiantCUP 13
4. SalmonHG 13
5. Charleston2TM 13
6. Williams2TM 12
7. HolmesBBS 9
8. McDuffie2TM 8
9. FlournoyBBS 8
10. Bell2TM 8

Adj. Pitching Wins

<strong>Adjusted Pitching Wins</strong><br>A set of formulas developed by Gary Gillette, Pete Palmer and others<br>that estimates a pitcher&#x2019;s total contributions<br>to a team&#x2019;s wins with his arm.<br>0.0 is an avg performance, <0 is worse than avg and >0 is better than avg

1. Hunter2TM 1.9
2. Charleston2TM 1.3
3. StrongHG 1.3
4. TiantCUP 1.3
5. SalmonHG 1.2
6. Williams2TM 1.2
7. HolmesBBS 0.9
8. McDuffie2TM 0.8
Bell2TM 0.8
10. FlournoyBBS 0.8

More 1932 East-West League Pages