Managerial Stats Table
Rk	Year	Age	Tm	Lg		W	L	W-L%	T	G	Finish	Wpost	Lpost	W-L%post	Ejections
1	1989	42	Houston Astros	NL		86	76	.531	0	162	3	0	0		1
2	1990	43	Houston Astros	NL		75	87	.463	0	162	5	0	0		5
3	1991	44	Houston Astros	NL		65	97	.401	0	162	6	0	0		2
4	1992	45	Houston Astros	NL		81	81	.500	0	162	4	0	0		1
5	1993	46	Houston Astros	NL		85	77	.525	0	162	3	0	0		3

6	1996	49	Oakland Athletics	AL		78	84	.481	0	162	3	0	0		1
7	1997	50	Oakland Athletics	AL		65	97	.401	0	162	4	0	0		3
8	1998	51	Oakland Athletics	AL		74	88	.457	0	162	4	0	0		1
9	1999	52	Oakland Athletics	AL		87	75	.537	0	162	2	0	0		1
10	2000	53	Oakland Athletics	AL		91	70	.565	0	161	1	2	3	.400	1
11	2001	54	Oakland Athletics	AL		102	60	.630	0	162	2	2	3	.400	1
12	2002	55	Oakland Athletics	AL		103	59	.636	0	162	1	2	3	.400	2

13	2003	56	New York Mets	NL		66	95	.410	0	161	5	0	0		1
14	2004	57	New York Mets	NL		71	91	.438	0	162	4	0	0		3
			Houston Astros		5 years	392	418	.484	0	810	4.2	0	0		12
			Oakland Athletics		7 years	600	533	.530	0	1133	2.4	6	9	.400	10
			New York Mets		2 years	137	186	.424	0	323	4.5	0	0		4
					14 years	1129	1137	.498	0	2266	3.4	6	9	.400	26

Managerial Tendencies

Managerial Tendencies Table
						Stealing 2nd				Stealing 3rd				Sac Bunts				Intentional Walks				Substitutions
Rk	Year	Age	Tm	Lg	G	Ch	Att	Rate	Rate+	Ch	Att	Rate	Rate+	Ch	Att	Rate	Rate+	PA	IBB	Rate	Rate+	PH/G	PH/G+	PR/G	PR/G+	P/G	P/G+
1	1989	42	HOU	NL	162	1435	174	12.1%	113	1034	23	2.2%	108	1343	43	3.2%	118	6290	94	1.5%	129	1.69	98	0.20	93	3.1	106
2	1990	43	HOU	NL	162	1483	228	15.4%	130	1055	26	2.5%	100	1433	46	3.2%	140	6143	74	1.2%	112	1.93	111	0.23	108	3.1	102
3	1991	44	HOU	NL	162	1469	169	11.5%	97	1066	16	1.5%	67	1418	29	2.0%	81	6255	62	1.0%	116	2.09	119	0.17	72	3.3	103
4	1992	45	HOU	NL	162	1464	160	10.9%	98	1039	26	2.5%	121	1458	49	3.4%	114	6213	60	1.0%	103	1.93	110	0.22	103	3.6	111
5	1993	46	HOU	NL	162	1470	132	9.0%	90	1071	20	1.9%	85	1409	30	2.1%	85	6079	52	0.9%	100	1.57	94	0.16	86	3.0	90

6	1996	49	OAK	AL	162	1530	84	5.5%	71	1011	6	0.6%	35	1508	35	2.3%	94	6505	61	0.9%	138	0.77	92	0.46	180	3.6	107
7	1997	50	OAK	AL	162	1570	95	6.1%	70	1065	9	0.8%	48	1578	48	3.0%	129	6600	54	0.8%	132	1.23	150	0.38	157	4.0	115
8	1998	51	OAK	AL	162	1506	144	9.6%	101	1110	23	2.1%	104	1577	55	3.5%	153	6310	29	0.5%	96	0.90	126	0.28	128	3.5	101
9	1999	52	OAK	AL	162	1553	90	5.8%	67	1122	12	1.1%	81	1613	37	2.3%	108	6309	45	0.7%	148	0.94	136	0.38	178	3.5	100
10	2000	53	OAK	AL	161	1566	42	2.7%	37	1080	8	0.7%	53	1610	24	1.5%	62	6355	57	0.9%	171	1.03	143	0.50	198	3.4	96
11	2001	54	OAK	AL	162	1507	75	5.0%	54	1039	18	1.7%	82	1532	25	1.6%	69	6115	49	0.8%	134	0.83	124	0.19	104	3.6	102
12	2002	55	OAK	AL	162	1451	56	3.9%	51	1039	7	0.7%	45	1497	17	1.1%	51	6158	45	0.7%	128	0.77	124	0.36	153	3.5	102

13	2003	56	NYM	NL	161	1392	88	6.3%	92	959	10	1.0%	84	1371	41	3.0%	131	6204	71	1.1%	144	1.70	104	0.34	210	3.6	94
14	2004	57	NYM	NL	162	1384	113	8.2%	118	991	16	1.6%	133	1353	31	2.3%	87	6333	70	1.1%	128	1.68	102	0.29	172	3.9	101
	HOU (5 years)				810	7321	863	11.8%	106	5265	111	2.1%	96	7061	197	2.8%	107	30980	342	1.1%	113	1.84	107	0.20	92	3.2	102
	OAK (7 years)				1133	10683	586	5.5%	65	7466	83	1.1%	66	10915	241	2.2%	95	44352	340	0.8%	136	0.92	128	0.36	159	3.6	103
	NYM (2 years)				323	2776	201	7.2%	105	1950	26	1.3%	108	2724	72	2.6%	108	12537	141	1.1%	135	1.69	103	0.31	190	3.7	97
	14 years				2266	20780	1650	7.9%	87	14681	220	1.5%	83	20700	510	2.5%	101	87869	823	0.9%	125	1.36	112	0.30	139	3.5	102