<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cubed Dozen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/5555/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/5555</link>
	<description>This and that about baseball stats.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2013 17:01:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kahuna Tuna</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/5555/comment-page-1#comment-16585</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kahuna Tuna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 00:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=5555#comment-16585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The title of this post confused me when I first read it.  &quot;Cubed Dozen&quot;? — 12 x 12 x 12 = 1,728?  I figured Steve must be discussing &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.baseball-reference.com/leaders/TOB_career.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the number of times Chico Carrasquel reached base&lt;/a&gt; in his career.

Alas, no. (-;þ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The title of this post confused me when I first read it.  "Cubed Dozen"? — 12 x 12 x 12 = 1,728?  I figured Steve must be discussing <a href="http://www.baseball-reference.com/leaders/TOB_career.shtml" rel="nofollow">the number of times Chico Carrasquel reached base</a> in his career.</p>
<p>Alas, no. (-;þ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kahuna Tuna</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/5555/comment-page-1#comment-16540</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kahuna Tuna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=5555#comment-16540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because the 2000 Dodgers allowed 12+ runs in a game only six times.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because the 2000 Dodgers allowed 12+ runs in a game only six times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/5555/comment-page-1#comment-16538</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=5555#comment-16538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why do the Dodgers show up in chart #2 but not chart #1?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do the Dodgers show up in chart #2 but not chart #1?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kahuna Tuna</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/5555/comment-page-1#comment-16529</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kahuna Tuna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 15:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=5555#comment-16529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just &#039;cause I feel like sharing, here are the 1894 NL standings for all such games.

Balt 2-14-0
Bkln 0-24-1
Bosn 3-22-1
Chic 2-24-0
Cinc 3-27-2
Clev 1-18-1
Loui 0-24-1
NewY 2-12-1
Phil 1-25-1
Pitt 0-19-0
StLo 2-19-0
Wash 2-26-0

More than one sixth (17.5%) of all NL games in 1894 ended with one or both teams scoring more than 11 runs in nine innings or less.  All teams were involved in at least 15 such games.  Runs per team per game in 1894 was 7.38, easily the highest figure of all time.  Pitchers were still getting used to the new 60&#039;6&quot; pitching distance, which had been established in 1893.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just 'cause I feel like sharing, here are the 1894 NL standings for all such games.</p>
<p>Balt 2-14-0<br />
Bkln 0-24-1<br />
Bosn 3-22-1<br />
Chic 2-24-0<br />
Cinc 3-27-2<br />
Clev 1-18-1<br />
Loui 0-24-1<br />
NewY 2-12-1<br />
Phil 1-25-1<br />
Pitt 0-19-0<br />
StLo 2-19-0<br />
Wash 2-26-0</p>
<p>More than one sixth (17.5%) of all NL games in 1894 ended with one or both teams scoring more than 11 runs in nine innings or less.  All teams were involved in at least 15 such games.  Runs per team per game in 1894 was 7.38, easily the highest figure of all time.  Pitchers were still getting used to the new 60'6" pitching distance, which had been established in 1893.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
