<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;I don&#8217;t believe &#8230; what I just saw!&#8221; (Final wild card wrap, 9/28/11)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/15399/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/15399</link>
	<description>This and that about baseball stats.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2013 17:01:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Twisto</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/15399/comment-page-2#comment-160850</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johnny Twisto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 04:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=15399#comment-160850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Duke, we&#039;ve definitely passed 200 before.  Andy posted a list of the most-commented not long ago.  Some of the HOF debates of last year got lots of posts.  The Larry Walker one might have been around 400?

But this is up there.  100 is sort of a milestone on this blog.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duke, we've definitely passed 200 before.  Andy posted a list of the most-commented not long ago.  Some of the HOF debates of last year got lots of posts.  The Larry Walker one might have been around 400?</p>
<p>But this is up there.  100 is sort of a milestone on this blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dukeofflatbush</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/15399/comment-page-2#comment-160830</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dukeofflatbush]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 03:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=15399#comment-160830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JA -
If you keep with your old posts, just letting you know; I never seen one hit 200 posts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JA -<br />
If you keep with your old posts, just letting you know; I never seen one hit 200 posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott-53</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/15399/comment-page-2#comment-160633</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scott-53]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 20:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=15399#comment-160633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@195: Still Trying to figure out how to paste something.

Google--( tv ratings mlb playoffs 1976)  tv by the numbers zap2it shows ALCS &#038; NLCS from 1976-2007.

@98:  typo: Cards game finished 10:25 p.m.  Oops!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@195: Still Trying to figure out how to paste something.</p>
<p>Google--( tv ratings mlb playoffs 1976)  tv by the numbers zap2it shows ALCS &amp; NLCS from 1976-2007.</p>
<p>@98:  typo: Cards game finished 10:25 p.m.  Oops!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Autin</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/15399/comment-page-2#comment-160518</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Autin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 16:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=15399#comment-160518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@194, Nightfly -- Where can I find the ratings of the postseasons? :)

Seriously, though -- I have no sense of the public sentiment on such things, but I would assume that anyone old enough to have followed the &#039;86 postseason would rank it among the top 3 in the 2-division era. All 3 of the series that year were classics.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@194, Nightfly -- Where can I find the ratings of the postseasons? 🙂</p>
<p>Seriously, though -- I have no sense of the public sentiment on such things, but I would assume that anyone old enough to have followed the '86 postseason would rank it among the top 3 in the 2-division era. All 3 of the series that year were classics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nightfly</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/15399/comment-page-2#comment-160486</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nightfly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 15:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=15399#comment-160486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike Scott... even the &#039;stros fans knew something was up.  They would bring signs to the Astrodome that read: &quot;The Right Scuff.&quot;  He threw a no-hitter that year too, didn&#039;t he?

The 1986 postseason is wildly underrated, by the way.  Both pennant series were great battles, followed by a strong seven-game World Series.  All the playoff teams had great players: Doc and Straw in their prime, and Hernandez and Carter; Houston with Ryan and Scott and Glenn Davis; Boston with Clemens, Boggs, Rice, and Dewey Evans; the Angels with Wally World, and good years from Downing and Jackson and DeCinces.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike Scott... even the 'stros fans knew something was up.  They would bring signs to the Astrodome that read: "The Right Scuff."  He threw a no-hitter that year too, didn't he?</p>
<p>The 1986 postseason is wildly underrated, by the way.  Both pennant series were great battles, followed by a strong seven-game World Series.  All the playoff teams had great players: Doc and Straw in their prime, and Hernandez and Carter; Houston with Ryan and Scott and Glenn Davis; Boston with Clemens, Boggs, Rice, and Dewey Evans; the Angels with Wally World, and good years from Downing and Jackson and DeCinces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dukeofflatbush</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/15399/comment-page-2#comment-160391</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dukeofflatbush]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 13:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=15399#comment-160391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike Scott!
That was such a freak year.
He did have another season where he won more (20 in’89) but his WAR was just 2.8 that year.
I’m a Mets fan and ’86 was when I first watched baseball with a critical eye. 
That year, there were tons of claims, especially from the Mets that Scott was doctoring the ball. Nothing much was made of it after the Astros lost and Scott faded, but he was so far ahead of what he did before and since, it makes one wonder.
He averaged 4.5 SO per 9, 9.5 hits per 9, a WHIP of 1.37 in 680 IP from ’79 to 85, then 10 so per 9, 5.9 hits per 9, a whip of .923 in 275.33 IP in ’86.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike Scott!<br />
That was such a freak year.<br />
He did have another season where he won more (20 in’89) but his WAR was just 2.8 that year.<br />
I’m a Mets fan and ’86 was when I first watched baseball with a critical eye.<br />
That year, there were tons of claims, especially from the Mets that Scott was doctoring the ball. Nothing much was made of it after the Astros lost and Scott faded, but he was so far ahead of what he did before and since, it makes one wonder.<br />
He averaged 4.5 SO per 9, 9.5 hits per 9, a WHIP of 1.37 in 680 IP from ’79 to 85, then 10 so per 9, 5.9 hits per 9, a whip of .923 in 275.33 IP in ’86.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: topper009</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/15399/comment-page-2#comment-160236</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[topper009]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 05:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=15399#comment-160236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To go along with 8 WAR with &#060; 100 K, here are the top WAR seasons with &#060; 100 hits from a batter

WAR  H Year  Tm    G
6.2... 95 1918 BOS  Babe Ruth         
5.5... 87 1995 OAK  Mark McGwire       
5.4... 90 1978 SDP  Gene Tenace
5.0... 94 1949 NYY  Joe DiMaggio]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To go along with 8 WAR with &lt; 100 K, here are the top WAR seasons with &lt; 100 hits from a batter</p>
<p>WAR  H Year  Tm    G<br />
6.2... 95 1918 BOS  Babe Ruth<br />
5.5... 87 1995 OAK  Mark McGwire<br />
5.4... 90 1978 SDP  Gene Tenace<br />
5.0... 94 1949 NYY  Joe DiMaggio</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: topper009</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/15399/comment-page-2#comment-160205</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[topper009]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 03:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=15399#comment-160205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[186 is right, trick question, Vida Blue reminded me of it]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>186 is right, trick question, Vida Blue reminded me of it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/15399/comment-page-2#comment-160204</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 03:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=15399#comment-160204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ahhh, forgot about Rollins actually.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhh, forgot about Rollins actually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: topper009</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/15399/comment-page-2#comment-160203</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[topper009]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 03:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=15399#comment-160203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Both wrong]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both wrong</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.189 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2016-08-19 10:30:40 -->
