<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Welcome 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/994/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/994</link>
	<description>This and that about baseball stats.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:57:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gerry</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/994/comment-page-1#comment-5863</link>
		<dc:creator>gerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/sotd/?p=994#comment-5863</guid>
		<description>Pitchers! how could I forget to look at pitchers? Thanks, whiz; I am now able to note that Blaine Boyer has thrown exactly 2009 pitches in his major league career.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pitchers! how could I forget to look at pitchers? Thanks, whiz; I am now able to note that Blaine Boyer has thrown exactly 2009 pitches in his major league career.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whiz</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/994/comment-page-1#comment-5861</link>
		<dc:creator>whiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/sotd/?p=994#comment-5861</guid>
		<description>Don Cardwell gave up 2009 hits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don Cardwell gave up 2009 hits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/994/comment-page-1#comment-5859</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/sotd/?p=994#comment-5859</guid>
		<description>I was astonished too, Gerry, especially considering how many totals of exactly 2008 there were last year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was astonished too, Gerry, especially considering how many totals of exactly 2008 there were last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gerry</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/994/comment-page-1#comment-5858</link>
		<dc:creator>gerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 04:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/sotd/?p=994#comment-5858</guid>
		<description>I am astonished that there is no one with exactly 2009 at-bats, or total bases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am astonished that there is no one with exactly 2009 at-bats, or total bases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raphy</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/994/comment-page-1#comment-5857</link>
		<dc:creator>Raphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/sotd/?p=994#comment-5857</guid>
		<description>Pitchers since 2000 who have thrown 2009 strikes in a season:
http://www.bb-ref.com/pi/shareit/EVyR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pitchers since 2000 who have thrown 2009 strikes in a season:<br />
<a href="http://www.bb-ref.com/pi/shareit/EVyR" rel="nofollow">http://www.bb-ref.com/pi/shareit/EVyR</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheGoof</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/994/comment-page-1#comment-5856</link>
		<dc:creator>TheGoof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/sotd/?p=994#comment-5856</guid>
		<description>You know, I remember Griffin as being considered a superior fielder, but the stats don&#039;t show it, and he only won one Gold Glove. Bill James rates him as a B-. I wonder if he was good, but viewed in some quarters as great. I suspect, despite the stats, that he was a very valuable part of his teams, which often were good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I remember Griffin as being considered a superior fielder, but the stats don't show it, and he only won one Gold Glove. Bill James rates him as a B-. I wonder if he was good, but viewed in some quarters as great. I suspect, despite the stats, that he was a very valuable part of his teams, which often were good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raphy</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/994/comment-page-1#comment-5855</link>
		<dc:creator>Raphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/sotd/?p=994#comment-5855</guid>
		<description>20-09 (SB-CS)
Season: http://www.bb-ref.com/pi/shareit/PKzu
Career: None

20-09 (W-L)
Season: http://www.bb-ref.com/pi/shareit/JH8a
Career: Dick Hughes http://www.bb-ref.com/pi/shareit/3dXJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>20-09 (SB-CS)<br />
Season: <a href="http://www.bb-ref.com/pi/shareit/PKzu" rel="nofollow">http://www.bb-ref.com/pi/shareit/PKzu</a><br />
Career: None</p>
<p>20-09 (W-L)<br />
Season: <a href="http://www.bb-ref.com/pi/shareit/JH8a" rel="nofollow">http://www.bb-ref.com/pi/shareit/JH8a</a><br />
Career: Dick Hughes <a href="http://www.bb-ref.com/pi/shareit/3dXJ" rel="nofollow">http://www.bb-ref.com/pi/shareit/3dXJ</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnnyTwisto</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/994/comment-page-1#comment-5854</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnnyTwisto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/sotd/?p=994#comment-5854</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I meant it seems like he&#039;s always been treated as a stopgap, though he has obviously been better than that.  He&#039;s never been that highly regarded.  Even when he came up, I don&#039;t recall him as a touted prospect.  He was just helping to replace all the Expos who had been traded off in the mid-90s.  He never really had a peak.  You&#039;d think someone having a career OPS+ of 90 would have a few individual seasons which were much better than that.  One would expect a guy with the moderate prime of Grudzielanek to fade away before now, and I suppose that&#039;s what his teams have always thought as well.  If anyone knew he&#039;d stay such a solid player for so long, he would have gotten better contracts.  He&#039;s never been considered part of the future, just the guy to keep you afloat a couple years until the future comes.  It&#039;s to his credit he&#039;s been so consistent and remained a very useful player for so long.

Was Griffin considered a good glove?  I have a memory that he wasn&#039;t.  He had some huge error totals (obviously that&#039;s not a great barometer by itself).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I meant it seems like he's always been treated as a stopgap, though he has obviously been better than that.  He's never been that highly regarded.  Even when he came up, I don't recall him as a touted prospect.  He was just helping to replace all the Expos who had been traded off in the mid-90s.  He never really had a peak.  You'd think someone having a career OPS+ of 90 would have a few individual seasons which were much better than that.  One would expect a guy with the moderate prime of Grudzielanek to fade away before now, and I suppose that's what his teams have always thought as well.  If anyone knew he'd stay such a solid player for so long, he would have gotten better contracts.  He's never been considered part of the future, just the guy to keep you afloat a couple years until the future comes.  It's to his credit he's been so consistent and remained a very useful player for so long.</p>
<p>Was Griffin considered a good glove?  I have a memory that he wasn't.  He had some huge error totals (obviously that's not a great barometer by itself).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheGoof</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/994/comment-page-1#comment-5853</link>
		<dc:creator>TheGoof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/sotd/?p=994#comment-5853</guid>
		<description>Or another way to look at it. Seems Alfredo Griffin is the worst offensive player to stick around a long, long time. Obviously, his glove helped make up for it. http://www.bb-ref.com/pi/shareit/YCQn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or another way to look at it. Seems Alfredo Griffin is the worst offensive player to stick around a long, long time. Obviously, his glove helped make up for it. <a href="http://www.bb-ref.com/pi/shareit/YCQn" rel="nofollow">http://www.bb-ref.com/pi/shareit/YCQn</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheGoof</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/994/comment-page-1#comment-5852</link>
		<dc:creator>TheGoof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/sotd/?p=994#comment-5852</guid>
		<description>Actually, Grudzy isn&#039;t much of a stopgrap guy compared to many others. I figured that was an awfully low OPS+ for a guy who has been around so long. Not so. The top guy in games at 90 or under is no slouch. And he&#039;s joined by a batch of Hall of Famers and candidates for the Hall. http://www.bb-ref.com/pi/shareit/44Vs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Grudzy isn't much of a stopgrap guy compared to many others. I figured that was an awfully low OPS+ for a guy who has been around so long. Not so. The top guy in games at 90 or under is no slouch. And he's joined by a batch of Hall of Famers and candidates for the Hall. <a href="http://www.bb-ref.com/pi/shareit/44Vs" rel="nofollow">http://www.bb-ref.com/pi/shareit/44Vs</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

