Comments on: 3+ XBH In Post-Season Game With No HR http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/8896 This and that about baseball stats. Tue, 16 Jul 2013 17:01:55 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.6 By: WS: Game 1 « Caught Looking http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/8896/comment-page-1#comment-64695 Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:47:29 +0000 http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=8896#comment-64695 [...] Sanchez didn’t have a bad game himself. He only doubled in his first three WS at-bats and finished with four hits and three RBI. Not bad for a former Bucco! (sorry, I had to add the Pirates plug in there). Three extra-base hits with no home runs in a WS game? It’s only happened a handful of times before. [...]

]]>
By: Steve Lombardi http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/8896/comment-page-1#comment-64656 Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:41:07 +0000 http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=8896#comment-64656 meant "not good enough to play SS or CF"

]]>
By: Steve Lombardi http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/8896/comment-page-1#comment-64655 Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:40:34 +0000 http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=8896#comment-64655 Brett - I noticed that too. Not sure if that's because, most of the time, 2Bs don't have a lot of HR power - but, are usually better hitters than SS or C with no HR power. You know, you have a guy who can hit, has no HR power, and his not go enough to play SS or CF, so, you stick him at 2B.

]]>
By: Brett http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/8896/comment-page-1#comment-64625 Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:58:04 +0000 http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=8896#comment-64625 Curiously, second basemen have accomplished this the most...

]]>
By: Leatherman http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/8896/comment-page-1#comment-64616 Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:32:39 +0000 http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=8896#comment-64616 Sanchez is the only one with 3 or more RBIs.

]]>
By: Steve Lombardi http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/8896/comment-page-1#comment-64614 Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:18:09 +0000 http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=8896#comment-64614 that is correct

]]>
By: John Autin http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/8896/comment-page-1#comment-64584 Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:37:38 +0000 http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=8896#comment-64584 @1, Dave -- Looks like reverse alphabetical order by last name.

]]>
By: Dave http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/8896/comment-page-1#comment-64580 Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:21:47 +0000 http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=8896#comment-64580 How are those listed

]]>