<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Crap for Your Crud</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/83/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/83</link>
	<description>This and that about baseball stats.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:57:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/83/comment-page-1#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/sotd/archives/83#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Of course, the real trade here is Michael Barrett for Kendall, since Barrett was just sent packing a few weeks ago for Bowen. Looking at it that way, I&#039;m sure the Cubbies are much better off with Kendall, who has at least played on a number of playoff teams. For whatever reason, Barrett just wasn&#039;t fitting in with the Cubs anymore. The total lack of offense from Kendall might be an okay tradeoff in this case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, the real trade here is Michael Barrett for Kendall, since Barrett was just sent packing a few weeks ago for Bowen. Looking at it that way, I'm sure the Cubbies are much better off with Kendall, who has at least played on a number of playoff teams. For whatever reason, Barrett just wasn't fitting in with the Cubs anymore. The total lack of offense from Kendall might be an okay tradeoff in this case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

