Comments on: Odds & Ends http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/737 This and that about baseball stats. Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:57:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Raphy http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/737/comment-page-1#comment-5276 Raphy Wed, 06 Aug 2008 17:20:56 +0000 http://www.baseball-reference.com/sotd/?p=737#comment-5276 Wow! Statboy , thanks for that article. It is a great read. Wow! Statboy , thanks for that article. It is a great read.

]]> By: whiz http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/737/comment-page-1#comment-5273 whiz Wed, 06 Aug 2008 16:38:57 +0000 http://www.baseball-reference.com/sotd/?p=737#comment-5273 That's a great article, statboy. Thanks for the link. That's a great article, statboy. Thanks for the link.

]]> By: statboy http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/737/comment-page-1#comment-5270 statboy Wed, 06 Aug 2008 15:51:30 +0000 http://www.baseball-reference.com/sotd/?p=737#comment-5270 gerry, Yeah, Lenn Sakata was catching. You can read about it here... http://swingandmiss.blogspot.com/2004/07/greatest-game-never-seen.html gerry,

Yeah, Lenn Sakata was catching. You can read about it here...
http://swingandmiss.blogspot.com/2004/07/greatest-game-never-seen.html

]]> By: gerry http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/737/comment-page-1#comment-5267 gerry Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:06:59 +0000 http://www.baseball-reference.com/sotd/?p=737#comment-5267 There's a story behind the Martinez game, though I'm not sure I'll get the details right. It's something like the team was forced to use as catcher someone who didn't ordinarily play that position, so all the runners were taking big leads & planning to steal second, so Martinez picked them off. There's a story behind the Martinez game, though I'm not sure I'll get the details right. It's something like the team was forced to use as catcher someone who didn't ordinarily play that position, so all the runners were taking big leads & planning to steal second, so Martinez picked them off.

]]> By: Raphy http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/737/comment-page-1#comment-5266 Raphy Wed, 06 Aug 2008 02:02:14 +0000 http://www.baseball-reference.com/sotd/?p=737#comment-5266 Yeah. I must have messed up my search. There have been 217. http://www.bb-ref.com/pi/shareit/cQQb Thanks. Yeah. I must have messed up my search. There have been 217.
http://www.bb-ref.com/pi/shareit/cQQb
Thanks.

]]> By: themadjuggler http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/737/comment-page-1#comment-5265 themadjuggler Wed, 06 Aug 2008 01:39:51 +0000 http://www.baseball-reference.com/sotd/?p=737#comment-5265 30,015? Wouldn't that be 3.5 of those per day since '56? 30,015? Wouldn't that be 3.5 of those per day since '56?

]]>