<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making a Habit of Losing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/649/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/649</link>
	<description>This and that about baseball stats.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:57:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raphy</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/649/comment-page-1#comment-4549</link>
		<dc:creator>Raphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 10:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/sotd/archives/649#comment-4549</guid>
		<description>To add to  gerry&#039;s point. There were 16 pitchers who qualified for the ERA title in 1968 and 1969 and had a lower ERA in the second year. Two pitchers stayed the same. Here is the list.

	        1968	1969	Change
Larry Dierker	3.31	2.33	-0.98
Jim Maloney	3.61	2.77	-0.84
Steve Carlton	2.99	2.17	-0.82
Joe Niekro	4.32	3.7	-0.62
Bill Singer	2.88	2.34	-0.54
Claude Osteen	3.09	2.66	-0.43
Bill Hands	2.89	2.49	-0.4
Mike Cuellar	2.74	2.38	-0.36
Jim McGlothlin	3.54	3.18	-0.36
Juan Marichal	2.43	2.1	-0.33
Mike McCormick	3.58	3.34	-0.24
Dave Boswell	3.32	3.23	-0.09
Fritz Peterson	2.63	2.55	-0.08
Mickey Lolich	3.19	3.14	-0.05
Phil Niekro	2.59	2.56	-0.03
Catfish Hunter	3.35	3.35	0
Joe Coleman	3.27	3.27	0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To add to  gerry's point. There were 16 pitchers who qualified for the ERA title in 1968 and 1969 and had a lower ERA in the second year. Two pitchers stayed the same. Here is the list.</p>
<p>	        1968	1969	Change<br />
Larry Dierker	3.31	2.33	-0.98<br />
Jim Maloney	3.61	2.77	-0.84<br />
Steve Carlton	2.99	2.17	-0.82<br />
Joe Niekro	4.32	3.7	-0.62<br />
Bill Singer	2.88	2.34	-0.54<br />
Claude Osteen	3.09	2.66	-0.43<br />
Bill Hands	2.89	2.49	-0.4<br />
Mike Cuellar	2.74	2.38	-0.36<br />
Jim McGlothlin	3.54	3.18	-0.36<br />
Juan Marichal	2.43	2.1	-0.33<br />
Mike McCormick	3.58	3.34	-0.24<br />
Dave Boswell	3.32	3.23	-0.09<br />
Fritz Peterson	2.63	2.55	-0.08<br />
Mickey Lolich	3.19	3.14	-0.05<br />
Phil Niekro	2.59	2.56	-0.03<br />
Catfish Hunter	3.35	3.35	0<br />
Joe Coleman	3.27	3.27	0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gerry</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/649/comment-page-1#comment-4548</link>
		<dc:creator>gerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 03:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/sotd/archives/649#comment-4548</guid>
		<description>DmbCubFan wanted pitchers whose stats didn&#039;t severely drop from 1968 to 1969. 
Juan Marichal&#039;s ERA went from 2.43 to 2.10. Steve Carlton&#039;s went from 2.99 to 2.17. 
Tom Seaver saw essentially no change, 2.20 to 2.21. Larry Dierker, huge improvement, 3.31 to 2.33. 
Gaylord Perry didn&#039;t change much, 2.44 to 2.49. Phil Niekro improved a hair, 2.59 to 2.56. 
And that&#039;s just the NL. 

Of course, ERA overall went up from 1968 to 1969, but not a few pitchers managed to swim against the tide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DmbCubFan wanted pitchers whose stats didn't severely drop from 1968 to 1969.<br />
Juan Marichal's ERA went from 2.43 to 2.10. Steve Carlton's went from 2.99 to 2.17.<br />
Tom Seaver saw essentially no change, 2.20 to 2.21. Larry Dierker, huge improvement, 3.31 to 2.33.<br />
Gaylord Perry didn't change much, 2.44 to 2.49. Phil Niekro improved a hair, 2.59 to 2.56.<br />
And that's just the NL. </p>
<p>Of course, ERA overall went up from 1968 to 1969, but not a few pitchers managed to swim against the tide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Twisto</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/649/comment-page-1#comment-4538</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Twisto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/sotd/archives/649#comment-4538</guid>
		<description>Everyone always ignores the 19th Century.  Amos Rusie had a 189 in 1894, and Clark Griffith 190 in 1898.

It was also done a few times in the 1880s, but I do like to draw a line in 1893 when the mound was moved back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone always ignores the 19th Century.  Amos Rusie had a 189 in 1894, and Clark Griffith 190 in 1898.</p>
<p>It was also done a few times in the 1880s, but I do like to draw a line in 1893 when the mound was moved back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David in Toledo</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/649/comment-page-1#comment-4535</link>
		<dc:creator>David in Toledo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/sotd/archives/649#comment-4535</guid>
		<description>Because of Tiant&#039;s 186 ERA+ in 1968, I ran a search to see how often a pitcher is that superior to the rest of the hurlers in a particular year.  The answer is 66 times, ERA+ 185 or higher, 162 minimum innings.  The first time was Cy Young in 1901.  In 1968 Luis Tiant was joined at that level by Bob Gibson (ERA+ 258, Stat O&#039; the Day April 20, 2008).

Highest ERA+ (easily available on the Leader boards) is Pedro Martinez, ERA+ 291 in 2000.  1997 is the only year in which four pitchers so distinguished themselves:  Clemens, Martinez, Maddux, R. Johnson.  

Three pitchers finished at the ERA+ 185 level in five seasons:  Martinez, R. Johnson, and W. Johnson.  Two finished there or above in four seasons:  Maddux and Lefty Grove.  Clemens is alone in recording a 185+ ERA in three seasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because of Tiant's 186 ERA+ in 1968, I ran a search to see how often a pitcher is that superior to the rest of the hurlers in a particular year.  The answer is 66 times, ERA+ 185 or higher, 162 minimum innings.  The first time was Cy Young in 1901.  In 1968 Luis Tiant was joined at that level by Bob Gibson (ERA+ 258, Stat O' the Day April 20, 2008).</p>
<p>Highest ERA+ (easily available on the Leader boards) is Pedro Martinez, ERA+ 291 in 2000.  1997 is the only year in which four pitchers so distinguished themselves:  Clemens, Martinez, Maddux, R. Johnson.  </p>
<p>Three pitchers finished at the ERA+ 185 level in five seasons:  Martinez, R. Johnson, and W. Johnson.  Two finished there or above in four seasons:  Maddux and Lefty Grove.  Clemens is alone in recording a 185+ ERA in three seasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Twisto</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/649/comment-page-1#comment-4534</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Twisto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/sotd/archives/649#comment-4534</guid>
		<description>Tiant missed a lot of &#039;70 and &#039;71 with arm injuries, and I wonder if he was already bothered in &#039;69.  He then returned in &#039;72 as a junkballer and had a great second act to his career.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tiant missed a lot of '70 and '71 with arm injuries, and I wonder if he was already bothered in '69.  He then returned in '72 as a junkballer and had a great second act to his career.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: damthesehigheels</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/649/comment-page-1#comment-4533</link>
		<dc:creator>damthesehigheels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/sotd/archives/649#comment-4533</guid>
		<description>on note number 4 you&#039;ll see everyone above (below?) edgar gonzalez on that list made relief appearances too...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>on note number 4 you'll see everyone above (below?) edgar gonzalez on that list made relief appearances too...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David in Toledo</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/649/comment-page-1#comment-4532</link>
		<dc:creator>David in Toledo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/sotd/archives/649#comment-4532</guid>
		<description>SmrtCubFan&#039;s reminder about the mound lowering means that Tiant in the spring of 1969 had a &quot;drop off&quot; in two respects.  But, as noted in post #1, by June he did adjust, or get over his arm trouble, or compensate somehow for whatever factors accounted for his terrible 1969 beginning.

I was also intrigued by Mike Maroth, who, after all, allowed only 49 base runners in 41 innings while losing seven straight.  He was pitching for a pretty bad team that year.  And this kind of thing happened.  On May 1, he had a no-hitter for 7 innings.  Then he got to 2 out and 2 on in the 8th.  Wild pitch, single, and he&#039;s out of the game, and his relief gives up 4 straight base runners on the way to a Maroth no-decision. . . . Four of Maroth&#039;s first 7 losses came in games when  HIS game score was 60 or higher (and in the other three, he stank).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SmrtCubFan's reminder about the mound lowering means that Tiant in the spring of 1969 had a "drop off" in two respects.  But, as noted in post #1, by June he did adjust, or get over his arm trouble, or compensate somehow for whatever factors accounted for his terrible 1969 beginning.</p>
<p>I was also intrigued by Mike Maroth, who, after all, allowed only 49 base runners in 41 innings while losing seven straight.  He was pitching for a pretty bad team that year.  And this kind of thing happened.  On May 1, he had a no-hitter for 7 innings.  Then he got to 2 out and 2 on in the 8th.  Wild pitch, single, and he's out of the game, and his relief gives up 4 straight base runners on the way to a Maroth no-decision. . . . Four of Maroth's first 7 losses came in games when  HIS game score was 60 or higher (and in the other three, he stank).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raphy</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/649/comment-page-1#comment-4529</link>
		<dc:creator>Raphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/sotd/archives/649#comment-4529</guid>
		<description>Tiant&#039;s ERA increased 2.11 points.  That was the second largest jump among pitchers who qualified for the title in both years. Only Steve Blass had a harder time adjusting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tiant's ERA increased 2.11 points.  That was the second largest jump among pitchers who qualified for the title in both years. Only Steve Blass had a harder time adjusting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DmbCubFan</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/649/comment-page-1#comment-4528</link>
		<dc:creator>DmbCubFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 06:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/sotd/archives/649#comment-4528</guid>
		<description>1968 -- Commonly known as the year of the pitcher.

After one of MLB&#039;s most pitching dominant season, they decided to lower the mound to 10 inches to put more power to the batter.

Find me a pitcher whose stats didn&#039;t severely drop from 1968 to 1969...

actually, that might be a great stat of the day topic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1968 -- Commonly known as the year of the pitcher.</p>
<p>After one of MLB's most pitching dominant season, they decided to lower the mound to 10 inches to put more power to the batter.</p>
<p>Find me a pitcher whose stats didn't severely drop from 1968 to 1969...</p>
<p>actually, that might be a great stat of the day topic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raphy</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/649/comment-page-1#comment-4527</link>
		<dc:creator>Raphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 23:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/sotd/archives/649#comment-4527</guid>
		<description>Wow. That&#039;s some drop-off Tiant had. 
In 1968 he lost his 7th game in his team&#039;s 108th game. 
In 1969 he lost his 7th game in his team&#039;s 28th game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. That's some drop-off Tiant had.<br />
In 1968 he lost his 7th game in his team's 108th game.<br />
In 1969 he lost his 7th game in his team's 28th game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

