<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WAR Data: Best Position Players Not In the Hall of Fame</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/6160/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/6160</link>
	<description>This and that about baseball stats.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:57:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Garrison</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/6160/comment-page-1#comment-22469</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Garrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 03:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=6160#comment-22469</guid>
		<description>You have Andre Dawson at number 41.... he of course is a (newly elected) HOFer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have Andre Dawson at number 41.... he of course is a (newly elected) HOFer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MHB</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/6160/comment-page-1#comment-21521</link>
		<dc:creator>MHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 02:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=6160#comment-21521</guid>
		<description>(A little off-topic)

Not that the Bambino needs more padding for his numbers, but Babe Ruth&#039;s listed WAR of 172.0 doesn&#039;t include his pitching WAR of 18.0. Absolutely amazing to look at what he did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(A little off-topic)</p>
<p>Not that the Bambino needs more padding for his numbers, but Babe Ruth's listed WAR of 172.0 doesn't include his pitching WAR of 18.0. Absolutely amazing to look at what he did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Saeger</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/6160/comment-page-1#comment-21366</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Saeger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 22:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=6160#comment-21366</guid>
		<description>TT@34: Whitaker was platooned starting in 1990. From 1987 through 1989, Whitaker started 285 games against righties and 102 games against lefties. From 1990 through 1992, he started 329 games against righties and 27 against lefties. He had great trouble hitting lefties.

C@27: You&#039;re joking, right? You don&#039;t know who Bobby Grich is? I&#039;ll assume you&#039;re under 30. Classic underrated ballplayer, was the best player on the 1979 Angels but the team DH won the MVP; arguably should have been the MVP in 1981.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TT@34: Whitaker was platooned starting in 1990. From 1987 through 1989, Whitaker started 285 games against righties and 102 games against lefties. From 1990 through 1992, he started 329 games against righties and 27 against lefties. He had great trouble hitting lefties.</p>
<p>C@27: You're joking, right? You don't know who Bobby Grich is? I'll assume you're under 30. Classic underrated ballplayer, was the best player on the 1979 Angels but the team DH won the MVP; arguably should have been the MVP in 1981.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An open letter to Baseball-Reference and the statistical powers that be &#124; Baseball: Past and Present</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/6160/comment-page-1#comment-21035</link>
		<dc:creator>An open letter to Baseball-Reference and the statistical powers that be &#124; Baseball: Past and Present</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 07:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=6160#comment-21035</guid>
		<description>[...] the heels of a pair of great Baseball-Reference blog posts this week ranking the best pitchers and position players not in the Hall of Fame based on their Wins Above Replacement data, I may have created a new [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the heels of a pair of great Baseball-Reference blog posts this week ranking the best pitchers and position players not in the Hall of Fame based on their Wins Above Replacement data, I may have created a new [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/6160/comment-page-1#comment-20981</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 00:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=6160#comment-20981</guid>
		<description>We&#039;re missing a very important player from the Hall of Fame shortstop list: Ernie Banks! 

Per Santo: it&#039;s an interesting inquiry. Statistically there are some compelling reasons to bring him in--what isn&#039;t taken into account is that the guy could be a cancer to his teams at times. Those intangibles are hard to incorporate when voting, but are some important in terms of team chemistry. In the same vein, while A-Rod outdoes Jeter statistically, there&#039;s no doubt in my mind I would build a team around Jeter over A-Rod. Chemistry is key in the clutch--hence Bonds has 0 rings, as would be the case for A-Rod minus Jeter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We're missing a very important player from the Hall of Fame shortstop list: Ernie Banks! </p>
<p>Per Santo: it's an interesting inquiry. Statistically there are some compelling reasons to bring him in--what isn't taken into account is that the guy could be a cancer to his teams at times. Those intangibles are hard to incorporate when voting, but are some important in terms of team chemistry. In the same vein, while A-Rod outdoes Jeter statistically, there's no doubt in my mind I would build a team around Jeter over A-Rod. Chemistry is key in the clutch--hence Bonds has 0 rings, as would be the case for A-Rod minus Jeter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TigersType</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/6160/comment-page-1#comment-20934</link>
		<dc:creator>TigersType</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 18:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=6160#comment-20934</guid>
		<description>As a lifelong Tigers fan, I sure don&#039;t remember Lou Whitaker being platooned. He was our leadoff hitter no matter who was pitching. This is a guy who is 4th all-time in games played at second base. Part of that is longevity, of course, but you still don&#039;t get there being platooned. I&#039;m not arguing he should be in the Hall of Fame, but I&#039;m not getting the suggestion that he was &quot;extensively&quot; platooned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a lifelong Tigers fan, I sure don't remember Lou Whitaker being platooned. He was our leadoff hitter no matter who was pitching. This is a guy who is 4th all-time in games played at second base. Part of that is longevity, of course, but you still don't get there being platooned. I'm not arguing he should be in the Hall of Fame, but I'm not getting the suggestion that he was "extensively" platooned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another day, another guest post: WAR and the Hall of Fame &#124; Baseball: Past and Present</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/6160/comment-page-1#comment-19888</link>
		<dc:creator>Another day, another guest post: WAR and the Hall of Fame &#124; Baseball: Past and Present</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 19:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=6160#comment-19888</guid>
		<description>[...] for Baseball In-Depth, examining a Baseball-Reference blog post that ranked the best pitchers and position players not in the Hall of Fame based on their WAR [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for Baseball In-Depth, examining a Baseball-Reference blog post that ranked the best pitchers and position players not in the Hall of Fame based on their WAR [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: argman</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/6160/comment-page-1#comment-19881</link>
		<dc:creator>argman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 18:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=6160#comment-19881</guid>
		<description>One thing about career WAR is that they don&#039;t seem to take &quot;peak value&quot; into account.  An extreme example is Hank Greenberg. He has 56.8 WAR in 1394 games, while Eddie Murray has 68.6 WAR in 3026 games.  More than twice as many games for Murray, and less than 20% more WAR.  And when you consider that Greenberg missed 3 or 4 seasons (sorry, too lazay to look it up) while serving in the military, you can&#039;t say that is part of his &quot;value&quot; as a player.  This is related to the point that BSK made earlier.  I voted for Larkin, but could easily see any of the above in the HOF, with the possible exception of Martinez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing about career WAR is that they don't seem to take "peak value" into account.  An extreme example is Hank Greenberg. He has 56.8 WAR in 1394 games, while Eddie Murray has 68.6 WAR in 3026 games.  More than twice as many games for Murray, and less than 20% more WAR.  And when you consider that Greenberg missed 3 or 4 seasons (sorry, too lazay to look it up) while serving in the military, you can't say that is part of his "value" as a player.  This is related to the point that BSK made earlier.  I voted for Larkin, but could easily see any of the above in the HOF, with the possible exception of Martinez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: masternachos</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/6160/comment-page-1#comment-19770</link>
		<dc:creator>masternachos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 21:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=6160#comment-19770</guid>
		<description>@Spartan Bill 
Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Spartan Bill<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baseball-Reference Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; WAR Data: Best Starting Pitchers Not In the Hall of Fame</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/6160/comment-page-1#comment-19762</link>
		<dc:creator>Baseball-Reference Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; WAR Data: Best Starting Pitchers Not In the Hall of Fame</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 20:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=6160#comment-19762</guid>
		<description>[...] I looked at the best eligible position players not in the Hall of Fame by WAR, and you responded with your votes by choosing Tim Raines as the non-HoFer you felt was most [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I looked at the best eligible position players not in the Hall of Fame by WAR, and you responded with your votes by choosing Tim Raines as the non-HoFer you felt was most [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

