You Are Here > Baseball-Reference.com > Blog >

SITE NEWS: We are moving all of our site and company news into a single blog for Sports-Reference.com. We'll tag all B-R content, so you can quickly and easily find the content you want.

Also, our existing B-R blog rss feed will be redirected to the new site's feed.

Baseball-Reference.com » Sports Reference

For more from Andy and the gang, check out their new site High Heat Stats.

AL vs NL: 1930s

Posted by Chris J. on January 10, 2008

The AL was the better hitter's league in the 1930s.  Let's use PI to see how big the difference was.  I'm going to order hitters by Runs Created, because it DOESN'T adjust for league context.  I'm trying to show the difference in leagues, after all.  Here's the best NL hitters, in terms of Runs Created for the decade.   And here's their AL counterparts.   Let's see:

1000 RC: - 4 in AL, 3 in NL

900 RC: 7 in AL, 5 in NL
800 RC: 11 in AL, 7 in NL

700 RC: 15 in AL, 12 in NL
600 RC:  24 in AL, 17 in NL
500 RC: 28 in AL, 20 in NL

It's a little screwy because there's more AL hitters in general, but in the 600s they pull away even if you adjust for that.  Heck, by the 800s they're pulling away.

This works for ERA, too.  Here's the NL leaders, and the AL leaders.

ERA under 3.00 - 1 in AL; 2 in NL

ERA under 3.50 - 2 in AL; 10 in NL
ERA under 4.00 - 7 in AL; 20 in NL

ERA under 4.50 - 20 in AL; 25 in NL

Now that really dramatizes the different, don't it.  And that tells you just how good Lefty Grove was - only one guy was within half a run of him.

Related posts:

    1-run victories (or, How the 2000s are just like the 1930s)
    The Bats of Jack Stivetts adn Charlie McCullough
    WHAT IF the American League abandoned the DH?
    WAR for Pitchers Updated Daily & WAR Leaders on Front Page

This entry was posted on Thursday, January 10th, 2008 at 10:05 am and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

3 Responses to “AL vs NL: 1930s”

  1. David in Toledo Says:

    Were there different AL balls and NL balls, or were the ML baseballs made in exactly the same way in exactly the same place?

  2. I didn't enough know that RC was a stat carried by the PI. I guess I know what I'm posting about tomorrow.

    By the way, Chris, I didn't realize just what an accomplished baseball writer you are over at THT until recently. It's very cool to have you as an author on this blog.

  3. Johnny Twisto Says:

    I think they did change the NL ball. The 1930 NL had notoriously high offense, and I think a year or two later they made changes, while the AL remained higher scoring.