<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saving The Pen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/484/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/484</link>
	<description>This and that about baseball stats.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 02:58:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/484/comment-page-1#comment-3049</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/sotd/archives/484#comment-3049</guid>
		<description>I found some stats on that for Sid Fernandez, and you are most certainly right about that. I&#039;ll make a post on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found some stats on that for Sid Fernandez, and you are most certainly right about that. I'll make a post on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kingturtle</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/484/comment-page-1#comment-3032</link>
		<dc:creator>kingturtle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 02:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/sotd/archives/484#comment-3032</guid>
		<description>Speaking of 6 inning starting pitching, I remember how Sid Fernandez used to have the most amazing first 4 or 5 innings only to louse it up before the 6th or 7th. I remember thinking he&#039;d be Cy Young if games were only 5 innings long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of 6 inning starting pitching, I remember how Sid Fernandez used to have the most amazing first 4 or 5 innings only to louse it up before the 6th or 7th. I remember thinking he'd be Cy Young if games were only 5 innings long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/484/comment-page-1#comment-3004</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 22:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/sotd/archives/484#comment-3004</guid>
		<description>Wow, interesting about CHW tying for the most 6+ inning starts, but having the worst record in those games. It almost makes you think they&#039;d have been better off pulling some of their starters, except of course their record in the other 39 games was much worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, interesting about CHW tying for the most 6+ inning starts, but having the worst record in those games. It almost makes you think they'd have been better off pulling some of their starters, except of course their record in the other 39 games was much worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OscarAzocar</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/484/comment-page-1#comment-3002</link>
		<dc:creator>OscarAzocar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/sotd/archives/484#comment-3002</guid>
		<description>Team records in 2007 in games when their starter went 6 or more innings.

TEAM		W		L		%

NYM		69	-	27		0.719
PHI		68	-	30		0.694
LAD		61	-	28		0.685
NYY		63	-	30		0.677
BOS		73	-	35		0.676
TOR		70	-	34		0.673
CLE		82	-	41		0.667
LAA		70	-	35		0.667
SEA		64	-	32		0.667
CHC		65	-	33		0.663
SDP		65	-	35		0.650
ATL		59	-	32		0.648
STL		55	-	32		0.632
ARI		64	-	39		0.621
DET		55	-	35		0.611
COL		58	-	40		0.592
MIL		59	-	41		0.590
FLA		43	-	30		0.589
MIN		60	-	42		0.588
PIT		58	-	42		0.580
KCR		46	-	34		0.575
OAK		58	-	44		0.569
BAL		48	-	41		0.539
HOU		55	-	47		0.539
TEX		37	-	32		0.536
TBD		53	-	46		0.535
WSN		38	-	34		0.528
SFG		53	-	48		0.525
CIN		51	-	47		0.520
CHW		62	-	61		0.504</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Team records in 2007 in games when their starter went 6 or more innings.</p>
<p>TEAM		W		L		%</p>
<p>NYM		69	-	27		0.719<br />
PHI		68	-	30		0.694<br />
LAD		61	-	28		0.685<br />
NYY		63	-	30		0.677<br />
BOS		73	-	35		0.676<br />
TOR		70	-	34		0.673<br />
CLE		82	-	41		0.667<br />
LAA		70	-	35		0.667<br />
SEA		64	-	32		0.667<br />
CHC		65	-	33		0.663<br />
SDP		65	-	35		0.650<br />
ATL		59	-	32		0.648<br />
STL		55	-	32		0.632<br />
ARI		64	-	39		0.621<br />
DET		55	-	35		0.611<br />
COL		58	-	40		0.592<br />
MIL		59	-	41		0.590<br />
FLA		43	-	30		0.589<br />
MIN		60	-	42		0.588<br />
PIT		58	-	42		0.580<br />
KCR		46	-	34		0.575<br />
OAK		58	-	44		0.569<br />
BAL		48	-	41		0.539<br />
HOU		55	-	47		0.539<br />
TEX		37	-	32		0.536<br />
TBD		53	-	46		0.535<br />
WSN		38	-	34		0.528<br />
SFG		53	-	48		0.525<br />
CIN		51	-	47		0.520<br />
CHW		62	-	61		0.504</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomd</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/484/comment-page-1#comment-3001</link>
		<dc:creator>tomd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/sotd/archives/484#comment-3001</guid>
		<description>Correlation is .257 which is pretty low.  1.0 would mean there is a perfect positive correlation while -1.0 would mean there is a perfect negative correlation.  .26 means there is a positive relationship but not very strong.  Things like bullpen strength, runs created and your point about this measuring long starts not necessarily quality starts are explantions.  Look at the White Sox at 123- they only won 72 games. The Yankees, Nationals and Rangers were the only teams that won more games than they had games that their starter made it to the sixth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correlation is .257 which is pretty low.  1.0 would mean there is a perfect positive correlation while -1.0 would mean there is a perfect negative correlation.  .26 means there is a positive relationship but not very strong.  Things like bullpen strength, runs created and your point about this measuring long starts not necessarily quality starts are explantions.  Look at the White Sox at 123- they only won 72 games. The Yankees, Nationals and Rangers were the only teams that won more games than they had games that their starter made it to the sixth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David in Toledo</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/484/comment-page-1#comment-2996</link>
		<dc:creator>David in Toledo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/sotd/archives/484#comment-2996</guid>
		<description>It would be interesting to correlate this column with the team&#039;s won-loss record.  I know New York Mets fans were beside themselves because their team was trying for the playoffs while ranking 20th.  If you have a really deep and strong bullpen (LAD?) maybe you can overcome this handicap, but of course that wasn&#039;t the 2007 Mets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be interesting to correlate this column with the team's won-loss record.  I know New York Mets fans were beside themselves because their team was trying for the playoffs while ranking 20th.  If you have a really deep and strong bullpen (LAD?) maybe you can overcome this handicap, but of course that wasn't the 2007 Mets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
