<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 bases-loaded walks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/4459/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/4459</link>
	<description>This and that about baseball stats.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:57:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/4459/comment-page-1#comment-11134</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=4459#comment-11134</guid>
		<description>Yeah sorry about that--originally I noticed that the number of BLW was about double the number of games a team plays in a season, but that&#039;s actually a pretty irrelevant number....from there I just got confused. heh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah sorry about that--originally I noticed that the number of BLW was about double the number of games a team plays in a season, but that's actually a pretty irrelevant number....from there I just got confused. heh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/4459/comment-page-1#comment-11132</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=4459#comment-11132</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m obviously late to the party here, but I got confused by the math/wording too, at first.  I figured the 13 per team per season as well, and then thought a good perspective from there was that that&#039;s roughly 2 BLW per team per month (or once every couple weeks or so) -- which does feel about right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm obviously late to the party here, but I got confused by the math/wording too, at first.  I figured the 13 per team per season as well, and then thought a good perspective from there was that that's roughly 2 BLW per team per month (or once every couple weeks or so) -- which does feel about right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ImAShark5</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/4459/comment-page-1#comment-11119</link>
		<dc:creator>ImAShark5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=4459#comment-11119</guid>
		<description>JT doesn&#039;t steal other people&#039;s thunder, I do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JT doesn't steal other people's thunder, I do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/4459/comment-page-1#comment-11118</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 01:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=4459#comment-11118</guid>
		<description>JT you are stealing my thunder again. My next post is going to look at bases-loaded walk rates vs total number of walks and total number of bases loaded situations. I haven&#039;t finished the analysis yet but it looks like 2009 saw a pretty sizable spike in bases-loaded walks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JT you are stealing my thunder again. My next post is going to look at bases-loaded walk rates vs total number of walks and total number of bases loaded situations. I haven't finished the analysis yet but it looks like 2009 saw a pretty sizable spike in bases-loaded walks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Twisto</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/4459/comment-page-1#comment-11117</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Twisto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=4459#comment-11117</guid>
		<description>If it&#039;s not obvious, the first sentence of my second paragraph should state &quot;you are no less likely to draw a walk WITH THE BASES LOADED than in any other force situation&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it's not obvious, the first sentence of my second paragraph should state "you are no less likely to draw a walk WITH THE BASES LOADED than in any other force situation"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Twisto</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/4459/comment-page-1#comment-11116</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Twisto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=4459#comment-11116</guid>
		<description>That is pretty shocking it happens more than twice a day.  Last year it occurred in 7.7% of all bases loaded plate appearances.  Walks occurred 8.7% of the time with bases empty, 11.7% of the time with men on, 7.7% of the time when there was men on first, first and second, or first and third (i.e. a force situation but an open base.) (if I calculated correctly)

So surprisingly, you are no less likely to draw a walk than in any other force situation.  I guess the risk of forcing in that run is equaled by the risk of multiple runs scoring on a grooved pitch.  

And unsurprisingly, one can infer from the above numbers that walks are most common with men on base but first base open (15.2% of PA, if I summed correctly).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is pretty shocking it happens more than twice a day.  Last year it occurred in 7.7% of all bases loaded plate appearances.  Walks occurred 8.7% of the time with bases empty, 11.7% of the time with men on, 7.7% of the time when there was men on first, first and second, or first and third (i.e. a force situation but an open base.) (if I calculated correctly)</p>
<p>So surprisingly, you are no less likely to draw a walk than in any other force situation.  I guess the risk of forcing in that run is equaled by the risk of multiple runs scoring on a grooved pitch.  </p>
<p>And unsurprisingly, one can infer from the above numbers that walks are most common with men on base but first base open (15.2% of PA, if I summed correctly).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerry</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/4459/comment-page-1#comment-11115</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=4459#comment-11115</guid>
		<description>I suppose one could say that on average there were (a bit over) 2 bases-loaded walks a day. That&#039;s pretty surprising - if someone tells you a bases-loaded walk is something that doesn&#039;t happen every day, you can retort that in fact it happens (on average) twice a day (during the season, of course).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose one could say that on average there were (a bit over) 2 bases-loaded walks a day. That's pretty surprising - if someone tells you a bases-loaded walk is something that doesn't happen every day, you can retort that in fact it happens (on average) twice a day (during the season, of course).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/4459/comment-page-1#comment-11113</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=4459#comment-11113</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I don&#039;t know what I&#039;m thinking. It&#039;s more like 13 per team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I don't know what I'm thinking. It's more like 13 per team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ImAShark5</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/4459/comment-page-1#comment-11112</link>
		<dc:creator>ImAShark5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=4459#comment-11112</guid>
		<description>It still doesn&#039;t make sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It still doesn't make sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/4459/comment-page-1#comment-11111</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=4459#comment-11111</guid>
		<description>oh, I left out the critical phrase &quot;PER SEASON&quot;...thanks. Fixed now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh, I left out the critical phrase "PER SEASON"...thanks. Fixed now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

