<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IBB&gt;UBB</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/3603/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/3603</link>
	<description>This and that about baseball stats.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:57:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DoubleDiamond</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/3603/comment-page-1#comment-10072</link>
		<dc:creator>DoubleDiamond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=3603#comment-10072</guid>
		<description>Even the nine pre-1973 occurrences were all in the National League. A lot for 2nd-half-of-1960s and 1st-half-of-1970s Pirates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even the nine pre-1973 occurrences were all in the National League. A lot for 2nd-half-of-1960s and 1st-half-of-1970s Pirates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gerry</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/3603/comment-page-1#comment-10028</link>
		<dc:creator>gerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=3603#comment-10028</guid>
		<description>To make this list, you need an OBP of less than .370 - or more than .600!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To make this list, you need an OBP of less than .370 - or more than .600!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/3603/comment-page-1#comment-10024</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=3603#comment-10024</guid>
		<description>Studies may show that lineup construction doesn&#039;t matter, but at least in 2004, Bonds was the exception to that general rule.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Studies may show that lineup construction doesn't matter, but at least in 2004, Bonds was the exception to that general rule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

