Comments on: Do-over: All of a team’s hits are homers http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/3371 This and that about baseball stats. Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:57:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Andy http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/3371/comment-page-1#comment-10122 Andy Tue, 01 Dec 2009 01:45:34 +0000 http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=3371#comment-10122 I call myself the best-looking man in the world, but that doesn't make it true. I call myself the best-looking man in the world, but that doesn't make it true.

]]> By: ImAShark2 http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/3371/comment-page-1#comment-10121 ImAShark2 Tue, 01 Dec 2009 01:23:57 +0000 http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=3371#comment-10121 I pronounce it as Jetter, though. I pronounce it as Jetter, though.

]]> By: rico petrocelli http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/3371/comment-page-1#comment-9872 rico petrocelli Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:21:58 +0000 http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=3371#comment-9872 I thought it was pronounced " (Tax) Jeeter" http://homerderby.com/archives/4017 I thought it was pronounced " (Tax) Jeeter"

http://homerderby.com/archives/4017

]]> By: ImAShark2 http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/3371/comment-page-1#comment-9842 ImAShark2 Sat, 14 Nov 2009 20:45:04 +0000 http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=3371#comment-9842 I mean anyway. I mean anyway.

]]> By: ImAShark2 http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/3371/comment-page-1#comment-9839 ImAShark2 Sat, 14 Nov 2009 19:26:20 +0000 http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=3371#comment-9839 Okay, but I think my last comments were just saying that Derek Jeter's last name was pronouncer as Jetter. I don't really remember writing any curses, but anyone, I will make insightful comments from now on. Okay, but I think my last comments were just saying that Derek Jeter's last name was pronouncer as Jetter. I don't really remember writing any curses, but anyone, I will make insightful comments from now on.

]]> By: Andy http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/3371/comment-page-1#comment-9837 Andy Sat, 14 Nov 2009 18:56:00 +0000 http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=3371#comment-9837 ImAShark--I don't know what happened to your account, but what I do know is that when I look at comments automatically blocked due to the use of foul language, there are more in there from you than from everyone else combined. Such garbage has no place here. If you keep your comments clean and polite, I'm sure there will be no trouble going forward. You've had some insightful comments in the past...keep the good stuff coming! ImAShark--I don't know what happened to your account, but what I do know is that when I look at comments automatically blocked due to the use of foul language, there are more in there from you than from everyone else combined. Such garbage has no place here. If you keep your comments clean and polite, I'm sure there will be no trouble going forward. You've had some insightful comments in the past...keep the good stuff coming!

]]> By: statboy http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/3371/comment-page-1#comment-9835 statboy Sat, 14 Nov 2009 18:00:02 +0000 http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=3371#comment-9835 The "all of a team's hits are doubles" record (since 1954) is pretty crazy. The record is NINE by the 1998 Braves, and the next highest is only FIVE. http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/ATL/ATL199808180.shtml The "all of a team's hits are doubles" record (since 1954) is pretty crazy. The record is NINE by the 1998 Braves, and the next highest is only FIVE.
http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/ATL/ATL199808180.shtml

]]> By: ImAShark2 http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/3371/comment-page-1#comment-9834 ImAShark2 Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:58:48 +0000 http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=3371#comment-9834 Sup. I used to be ImAShark here, but for some reason all of a sudden I couldn't post. There were a lot of blogs that I would have liked to comment on, but I just got around to making a new account. So I will just say that this is a very interesting stat, and I was wondering if anyone knew of some pre-1954 games that could be added to this list (specifically 3+ hits for homers)? Sup. I used to be ImAShark here, but for some reason all of a sudden I couldn't post. There were a lot of blogs that I would have liked to comment on, but I just got around to making a new account. So I will just say that this is a very interesting stat, and I was wondering if anyone knew of some pre-1954 games that could be added to this list (specifically 3+ hits for homers)?

]]> By: dave http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/3371/comment-page-1#comment-9833 dave Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:09:21 +0000 http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=3371#comment-9833 not to mention the 4 games since 1954 where both teams in a game had all of their hits be extra base hits (and only once since 1966!) not to mention the 4 games since 1954 where both teams in a game had all of their hits be extra base hits (and only once since 1966!)

]]> By: When all of the Yanks hits were home runs | River Avenue Blues http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/3371/comment-page-1#comment-9832 When all of the Yanks hits were home runs | River Avenue Blues Sat, 14 Nov 2009 16:10:37 +0000 http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=3371#comment-9832 [...] the Baseball Reference Blog, Andy takes a look at games wherein all of a team’s hits were home runs. There are 39 such [...] [...] the Baseball Reference Blog, Andy takes a look at games wherein all of a team’s hits were home runs. There are 39 such [...]

]]>