<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Starters Who Starred In Post-Season Debut (Since &#8217;95)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/2856/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/2856</link>
	<description>This and that about baseball stats.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:57:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnnyTwisto</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/2856/comment-page-1#comment-9431</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnnyTwisto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 05:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=2856#comment-9431</guid>
		<description>Well I mainly wanted to provide some context to the numbers.  I wasn&#039;t really sure until I looked further whether 10% of starts at that threshold was poor, typical, or what.  A .300 BA in the postseason isn&#039;t the same as a .300 BA against the Royals either, but at least we have an idea what it means.

Anyway, a nice average Greinke start of 63 for Burnett tonight (if I remember how to calculate GS correctly...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I mainly wanted to provide some context to the numbers.  I wasn't really sure until I looked further whether 10% of starts at that threshold was poor, typical, or what.  A .300 BA in the postseason isn't the same as a .300 BA against the Royals either, but at least we have an idea what it means.</p>
<p>Anyway, a nice average Greinke start of 63 for Burnett tonight (if I remember how to calculate GS correctly...)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Lombardi</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/2856/comment-page-1#comment-9428</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Lombardi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=2856#comment-9428</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;11.1% of all regular season starts since 1995 are at least a 70 Game Score, compared to the 10.4% you found above.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Johnny - True, but, it could be suggested that there&#039;s more pressure in making your first ever career start in the post-season than making career start # 67 in a game against the Royals, in July, when your team is 15 games out of first...

So, does it make sense to use &quot;all regular season starts GS 70+ ratio&quot; as the yardstick for first ever career start in the post-season?  Just a thought...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>11.1% of all regular season starts since 1995 are at least a 70 Game Score, compared to the 10.4% you found above.</p></blockquote>
<p>Johnny - True, but, it could be suggested that there's more pressure in making your first ever career start in the post-season than making career start # 67 in a game against the Royals, in July, when your team is 15 games out of first...</p>
<p>So, does it make sense to use "all regular season starts GS 70+ ratio" as the yardstick for first ever career start in the post-season?  Just a thought...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnnyTwisto</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/2856/comment-page-1#comment-9427</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnnyTwisto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=2856#comment-9427</guid>
		<description>11.1% of all regular season starts since 1995 are at least a 70 Game Score, compared to the 10.4% you found above.  Of course, the postseason pitchers should be a better group overall, but they are also facing better offenses.  14.1% of all postseason starts since 1995 have been at least a 70.  So the average pitcher making his first postseason start appears to perform slightly worse than those who have started before.  First-timers are probably lesser pitchers overall, and it is possible that nerves have some effect as well.

Anyway, one can have a very good start while coming up short of 70.  Lincecum&#039;s average Game Score this season was 64; I&#039;d certainly take an average Lincecum start.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>11.1% of all regular season starts since 1995 are at least a 70 Game Score, compared to the 10.4% you found above.  Of course, the postseason pitchers should be a better group overall, but they are also facing better offenses.  14.1% of all postseason starts since 1995 have been at least a 70.  So the average pitcher making his first postseason start appears to perform slightly worse than those who have started before.  First-timers are probably lesser pitchers overall, and it is possible that nerves have some effect as well.</p>
<p>Anyway, one can have a very good start while coming up short of 70.  Lincecum's average Game Score this season was 64; I'd certainly take an average Lincecum start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Looking For A Big Game From A.J. Burnett Tonight?</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/2856/comment-page-1#comment-9420</link>
		<dc:creator>Looking For A Big Game From A.J. Burnett Tonight?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=2856#comment-9420</guid>
		<description>[...] The odds are really against it happening. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The odds are really against it happening. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

