<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How&#8217;d They Do That?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/2668/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/2668</link>
	<description>This and that about baseball stats.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:57:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sweet Uncle Lou&#8217;s Friday Roundup: The &#8220;Brink of Mathematical Elimination&#8221; Edition&#160;&#124;&#160;Hire Jim Essian</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/2668/comment-page-1#comment-9203</link>
		<dc:creator>Sweet Uncle Lou&#8217;s Friday Roundup: The &#8220;Brink of Mathematical Elimination&#8221; Edition&#160;&#124;&#160;Hire Jim Essian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=2668#comment-9203</guid>
		<description>[...] I didn&#8217;t realize until this week (thank you, ChuckDickens) that the incomparable Baseball-Reference.com has a blog. On it, they point out little statistical quirks and interesting tidbits. One particular anomaly I enjoyed was the number of teams who walked fifteen batters in a game and still managed to win the game. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I didn&#8217;t realize until this week (thank you, ChuckDickens) that the incomparable Baseball-Reference.com has a blog. On it, they point out little statistical quirks and interesting tidbits. One particular anomaly I enjoyed was the number of teams who walked fifteen batters in a game and still managed to win the game. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheGoofyOne</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/2668/comment-page-1#comment-9189</link>
		<dc:creator>TheGoofyOne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=2668#comment-9189</guid>
		<description>An interesting lesson from that 1992 game. Strikeouts, as mentioned in a recent post, keep runners rooted to their bases. A walk is often as good as a hit, but not when combined with Ks, because that is interrupted station-to-station baseball. So if you&#039;re a team that&#039;s walking 15 guys, if you can combine that with few hits, 9 Ks and 2 guys caught stealing, you&#039;ve got a chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting lesson from that 1992 game. Strikeouts, as mentioned in a recent post, keep runners rooted to their bases. A walk is often as good as a hit, but not when combined with Ks, because that is interrupted station-to-station baseball. So if you're a team that's walking 15 guys, if you can combine that with few hits, 9 Ks and 2 guys caught stealing, you've got a chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wboenig2</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/2668/comment-page-1#comment-9188</link>
		<dc:creator>wboenig2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=2668#comment-9188</guid>
		<description>Footnote to history:  On April 10, 1991 the Phillies beat the Mets 8-7 in 10 innings; the Phillies allowed 15 walks in the first nine innings of that game.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/NYN/NYN199104100.shtml

I remember listening to that one on the radio.  Time of the game was 4:51; had it ended in 9 innings, it would have been the longest nine-inning game in history up to that point.  (I think the Red Sox and Yankees have played a longer one since then.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Footnote to history:  On April 10, 1991 the Phillies beat the Mets 8-7 in 10 innings; the Phillies allowed 15 walks in the first nine innings of that game.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/NYN/NYN199104100.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/NYN/NYN199104100.shtml</a></p>
<p>I remember listening to that one on the radio.  Time of the game was 4:51; had it ended in 9 innings, it would have been the longest nine-inning game in history up to that point.  (I think the Red Sox and Yankees have played a longer one since then.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dgreds</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/2668/comment-page-1#comment-9184</link>
		<dc:creator>dgreds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=2668#comment-9184</guid>
		<description>It also helps to score lots of runs. I would have thought you&#039;d need to get some doubleplays but they both  did it without turning any.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It also helps to score lots of runs. I would have thought you'd need to get some doubleplays but they both  did it without turning any.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smedindy</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/2668/comment-page-1#comment-9183</link>
		<dc:creator>smedindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 03:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/?p=2668#comment-9183</guid>
		<description>Well, all of the Red Sox runs were walked home in 1992, thanks to Hough and Alvarez. So it DID kill them, but in a concentrated setting. And they soon calmed down, a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, all of the Red Sox runs were walked home in 1992, thanks to Hough and Alvarez. So it DID kill them, but in a concentrated setting. And they soon calmed down, a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

