<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fewest pitches in a CG</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/111/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/111</link>
	<description>This and that about baseball stats.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:01:43 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: birtelcom</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/111/comment-page-1#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>birtelcom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/sotd/archives/111#comment-113</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious, what years or parts of years does the database have pitch counts for? Or to put in  another way, when we do a PI search for pitch count, what years (or parts of years) are we looking at?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm curious, what years or parts of years does the database have pitch counts for? Or to put in  another way, when we do a PI search for pitch count, what years (or parts of years) are we looking at?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moondoggyJ55</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/111/comment-page-1#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>moondoggyJ55</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 16:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/sotd/archives/111#comment-97</guid>
		<description>ITs cool how harden was had the most strikeouts outa the bunch. It goes to show you that sinker ballers are more efficientadn can really last longer.  Cook adn Silva both suprised me to be on that list andat the top of it.  i would&#039;&#039;ve assume clemens or someone wit a real accurate arm would dominate he list.  Cool stat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ITs cool how harden was had the most strikeouts outa the bunch. It goes to show you that sinker ballers are more efficientadn can really last longer.  Cook adn Silva both suprised me to be on that list andat the top of it.  i would''ve assume clemens or someone wit a real accurate arm would dominate he list.  Cool stat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.baseball-reference.com/blog/archives/111/comment-page-1#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baseball-reference.com/sotd/archives/111#comment-96</guid>
		<description>When you lift the 9-inning restriction, I expected to find some pitchers who threw 8-inning complete games that were road losses because the home team didn&#039;t need to bat in the bottom of the 9th. But no such games show up (although shortened games such as Pascual Perez&#039; 5-inning no hitter do show up.)

Anybody know the deal with that? Does Retrosheet not count losses as CGs anymore?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you lift the 9-inning restriction, I expected to find some pitchers who threw 8-inning complete games that were road losses because the home team didn't need to bat in the bottom of the 9th. But no such games show up (although shortened games such as Pascual Perez' 5-inning no hitter do show up.)</p>
<p>Anybody know the deal with that? Does Retrosheet not count losses as CGs anymore?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
