You Are Here > Baseball-Reference.com > Blog >

SITE NEWS: We are moving all of our site and company news into a single blog for Sports-Reference.com. We'll tag all B-R content, so you can quickly and easily find the content you want.

Also, our existing B-R blog rss feed will be redirected to the new site's feed.

Baseball-Reference.com ยป Sports Reference

For more from Andy and the gang, check out their new site High Heat Stats.

Game Review: MLB 11 The Show vs. MLB 2K11 (PS3)

Posted by Neil Paine on March 30, 2011

Just in time for Opening Day, here's my head-to-head review of the two major baseball games on the console market this year, MLB 11: The Show and Major League Baseball 2k11.

Graphics: Ballpark-wise, I think 2K11 stands up very well to The Show, but overall I have to give the visual nod to MLB 11. Its player faces and body types are much more accurate-looking, the animations are smoother, and The Show has none of the occasional framerate hiccups you'll find in 2K11. I like how both games offer progressive lighting effects -- i.e., the shadows in the park change as the game goes on -- though I think MLB 11 pulls this off a bit better than 2K11. One positive about 2K11 is that its in-game colors are much more vibrant, while The Show generally features more muted visuals, but that doesn't make up for MLB 11's overall advantages. The Show wins the graphical category.

Presentation: In-game, 2K11 offers a slightly superior presentation with bells & whistles like the integration of Inside Edge scouting reports and a neat win probability graph in the pause menu. The Show is more traditional, trying to mimic an actual TV broadcast, so its presentation is solid but largely unspectacular, aside from a decent array of situational player cutscenes. On the front end, 2K Sports games typically have a counterintuitive menu system and MLB 2K11 is no different, using the same setup we've seen from the company's sports games for the past few years. MLB 11's frontend is much better, with simpler navigation and a cool dynamic ballpark feature that displays your favorite team's park in the background (or shuffles through all parks if you don't pick a favorite). So who wins on balance depends on whether you enjoy a flashy in-game presentation or not, and for the record I like 2K11 here.

Sound: I have to give 2K11 a big edge here. The in-game commentary by Gary Thorne, Steve Phillips, and John Kruk is impressive as always, replicating the chatter of a real baseball broadcast as well as any game I've ever played. All sports games will have some repetition in their commentary from time to time, but 2K11 mostly does a great job of having the 3 guys in the booth sound like they're having a real conversation about the game. The Show's crew of Matt Vasgersian, Dave Campbell, & Eric Karros, on the other hand, lacks any such enthusiasm or chemistry: sure, they get the job done, but you would never confuse their commentary with that of an actual game. Crowd-wise, The Show is a little better -- the fans have more awareness about the on-field action -- and in the menus, the music is typical sports game fare (though credit goes to both games for including older artists like the Edgar Winter group and Joan Jett). All in all, MLB 2K11 has a leg up in the sound department.

Gameplay: At a certain level, this is all that matters, and MLB 11 has the advantage (though it is not as wide as in the past). The big change this year was the addition of analog batting, pitching, and fielding controls to The Show, matching what 2K was offering the past few years. And as with any first-year feature, there are issues, especially when hitting.

Both games now have you push the right thumbstick forward to swing the bat, which I am generally not a fan of, and 2K11 executes this better because they only make you time the stick's pullback on power swings -- The Show forces you to do this on every swing, making it very difficult to time this mechanism correctly while maintaining plate discipline, especially on all-star difficulty and above. The irony is that the batter-pitcher matchup is more nuanced in The Show, so the new controls unnecessarily complicate what had been a very good thing in past versions of the game. On the other hand, 2K11's only big batting flaw is its camera angle, which needs a lot of tweaking before finding a view where you can reliably discern balls from strikes.

Pitching-wise, MLB 11's new analog controls are a more pleasant addition -- think of them as a hybrid between MLB 2K11's pure gesture-based scheme and the traditional meter-based action The Show used to employ. Among analog systems, I prefer 2K11's approach (wherein you mimic the pitch's arm action using the right stick), but MLB 11's scheme offers its own unique challenges if you stay with it through the learning curve. And, fortunately, you can also enable the control settings from MLB 10 if you dislike the changes. Right now, I mix the pitching between analog and meter, but bat exclusively with the old zone-based setting, getting back to the core of The Show's great batter-pitcher duels without the needless complication of new controls.

In the field, The Show makes a good representation of baseball when catching the ball, while 2K11's throwing controls are far superior. Overall, though, fielding is made difficult in 2K11 by a bad set of camera angles which makes every infield reaction an adventure. The same goes for baserunning -- 2K11 simply doesn't have a nice, high angle of the field like The Show does, and it impacts gameplay. Ironically, the game that gets its default camera angles right (MLB 11) offers a nearly endless combination of custom camera tweaks, while the game with bad angles (2K11) has little in the way of camera customization.

It's easy to get caught up in the minutia of control schemes, but looking at the big-picture, MLB 11 gives a better, more realistic on-field representation of baseball. 2K11 is getting better, and The Show didn't do itself any favors with the new batting controls, but MLB 11 wins this category on the strength of a better core batter-pitcher interface, more realistic physics, better camera angles, and a more nuanced feel for the game. I will say that 2K11 shows flashes of the type of greatness MVP Baseball offered circa 2005, so the potential is there for a truly outstanding game, but for now MLB 11 is still the on-field champ.

Replay Value: A slight edge in secondary game modes has to go to MLB 11 as well. Each game offers similar features, including franchise, HR derby, and "build your own major leaguer" modes (2K11 calls it "My Player"; MLB 11's is named "Road to the Show"), but the Show generally pulls these off with slightly more polish -- not that either game's franchise mode will ever be confused with Out of the Park or Baseball Mogul. In 2K11's favor, they offer a more exciting way to interact with the actual major leagues in real time, thanks to MLB Today (which allows you to play scheduled matchups on the same day) and the ability for franchise-mode player ratings to change based on real-life performance (the extent of The Show's work in this department is the typical weekly live roster update). But in terms of replay value independent of gameplay, I'd give a very small edge to MLB 11: The Show.

The Last Word: I like what MLB 2K11 is building, and I like that console baseball games have a real race this year instead of a runaway victory for The Show. MLB 2K has certainly improved far more than The Show over the past few years, and in some ways MLB 11 was barely an improvement over last year's edition (even considering the control-scheme changes). But while the gap has been narrowed, MLB 11 still separates itself with better graphics, gameplay, and generally a more polished game. If you have an Xbox, rejoice that your system has a baseball game worth playing again -- but if you have a PS3, do yourself a favor and pick up a copy of The Show.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, March 30th, 2011 at 1:26 pm and is filed under Bloops, Reviews. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

10 Responses to “Game Review: MLB 11 The Show vs. MLB 2K11 (PS3)”

  1. andy samford Says:

    this being a statistics oriented website, i'm surprised that you would not spend a bit of time comparing baseball games that actually care about the accuracy of their statistical output, such as OOTP, Diamond Mind, PC Replay, and Action PC, all of which have recently released or are about to release new versions of their games.

  2. One thing that doesn't make sense is that if you go to SF and hit a ball into the water over the right field seats, it does actually make a splash sound but because of the crowd, music, and announcers, you can't hear the water splash effect.

  3. One of the best comparisons I have read out there. As a PS3 user I went with 2K11 over the Show 11 largely because I'm a little tired of the Show after years of playing it and I prefer the gesture pitching. A big plus for me is my slow reflexes and the slower pitch speed in 2K11.

    I actually love the default batting camera in 2K11. 2K11 does offer great camera options in batting and pitching. It's the baserunning camera that has no options. Users should have been able to use the traditional fielding camera instead of first-person type of view.

    The Show is definitely more polished than the buggy 2K11 but both games are fun this year.

  4. #3 - Thanks. My biggest problem with the default batting cam in 2K11 is in situations where you're facing a same-handed pitcher and the batter's stance crowds the plate (i.e., David Ortiz), because you literally cannot see the ball when it's released. I think "Batting 3" (the low, catcher-angle cam) is what I settled on, zoomed as much as possible. From that angle it's pretty fun to hit, and actually a little reminiscent of MVP 2004 (one of my fave games ever).

    #1 - I would love to review those games, but unfortunately, they didn't send me free review copies.

  5. 2K11 has made improvements but there really wasn't anywhere to go but up after that horrendous 2k9 version. The player models are still pretty bad thought and most players don't look much like their real life counterparts.

    I still think The Show has a sizable lead.

  6. I second Andy's post. I play Action PC baseball for my leagues and tournaments and think it's the best out there. I would love to see a review on it and the other stat based games. BTW, I love this site ! Best stats anywhere !!!

  7. http://distantreplay.org/MLB/

    For anyone interested in Action Leagues that's my site for my leagues and tournaments. The more the merrier !

  8. Johnny Twisto Says:

    replicating the chatter of a real baseball broadcast

    Is that a good thing?

  9. I love, absolutely LOVE, MLB the show.

    That being said it will never trump my interest in OOTP as the best, most realistic, endless possibilities and replay value game in my book.

  10. #4 You should contact Markus at OOTP I am pretty sure he has no problem doing that.